How Will Open Science Impact on University-Industry Collaboration?
PDF (Русский)
PDF

Keywords

science policy
knowledge exchange
open science
open access
university/industry collaborations
research funders

How to Cite

ChatawayJ., ParksS., & SmithE. (2017). How Will Open Science Impact on University-Industry Collaboration?. Foresight and STI Governance, 11(2), 44-53. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.44.53

Abstract

Open science represents a challenge to traditional modes of scientific practice and collaboration.  Knowledge exchange is still heavily influenced by researchers’ ambitions to publish in highly cited journals and within ‘closed partnerships’ where interactions are based upon intellectual property rights.  However, perceived inefficiencies, a desire to make publicly funded research available to all and a crisis of confidence in the quality of research published in top journals all serve to fuel demands for more openness in the conduct of science and the exchange of scientific knowledge.  Whilst there is a strong logic behind the contention that increased openness will promote efficiencies, quality and fairness, there is still considerable uncertainty about the impact on university/industry collaboration and the balance that needs to be struck between open and closed approaches.  Policy obstacles are also likely to impede the pace of change. 

https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.2.44.53
PDF (Русский)
PDF

References

Archambault E., Amyot D., Deschamps P., Nicol A., Rebout L., Roberge G. (2013) Proportion of Open Access Peer-Reviewed Papers at the European and World Levels - 2004-2011. Brussels; Montreal; Washington: ScienceMetrix Inc. Режим доступа: http://www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_EC_OA_Availability_2004-2011.pdf, дата обращения 24.02.2017.

Arora A., Athreye S. (2012) Patent Incentives: Returns to Patenting and the Inducement for Research & Development. Intellectual Property Office Research Paper № 2012/20, November 2012. Newport (UK): Intellectual Property Office.

Begley C.G., Ellis L.M. (2012) Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research // Nature. Vol. 483. P. 531-533.

Bubela Т., Gold E.R., Graff G.D., Castle D. (2013) Patent Landscaping for Life Sciences Innovation: Toward Consistent and Transparent Practices // Nature Biotechnology. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 202-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2521

Burk D., Lemley M. (2009) The patent crisis and how the courts can solve it. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chalmers I., Bracken M.B., Djulbegovic B., Garattini S., Grant J., Gülmezoglu A.M., Howells D.W., Ioannidis P.A., Oliver S. (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set // Lancet. Vol. 383. № 9912. Р. 156-165.

Chalmers I., Glazsiou P. (2009) Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence // Lancet. Vol. 374. P. 86-89.

Chataway J., Hanlin R., Mugwagwa J., Muraguri L. (2010) Global health social technologies: Reflections on evolving theories and landscapes // Research Policy. Vol. 39. № 10. P. 1277-1288. Режим доступа: , дата обращения 19.06.2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.07.006

Chataway J., Smith J. (2007) Shaping scientific excellence in agricultural research // International Journal of Biotechnology. Vol. 9. № 2. P. 172-180.

Cooper S., Khatib F., Treuille A., Barbero J., Lee J., Beenen M., Leaver-Fay A., Baker D., Popovic Z. (2010) FoldIt Players. Predicting protein structures with a multiplayer online game // Nature. Vol. 466. P. 756-760.

Council of the European Union (2016) Outcome of proceedings of May 27, 2016 - RECH 208 TELECOM 100, 9526/16. Brussels. Council of the European Union: Режим доступа: http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9526-2016-INIT/en/pdf, дата обращения 13.10.2016.

Edwards E. (2013) The prevailing view in biomedicine and drug discovery is that we need more ‘innovation’. Режим доступа: http://www.thesgc.org/blog/biotech-and-innovation, дата обращения 19.06.2016.

Eisenberg R.S. (2012) Wisdom of the Ages or Dead-Hand Control? Patentable Subject Matter for Diagnostic Methods After In Re Bilski // Case Western Reserve Journal of Law, Technology and the Internet. Vol. 3. № 1. P. 1-65.

European Commission (2012a) Commission Recommendation of 17 July 2012 on access to and preservation of scientific information (COM(2012) 4890 final). Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/recommendation-access-and-preservation-scientific-information_en.pdf, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

European Commission (2012b) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Reinforced European Research Area Partnership for Excellence and Growth (COM(2012) 392 final). Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/euraxess/pdf/research_policies/era-communication_en.pdf, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

European Commission (2015) Validation of the results of the public consultation on Science 2.0: Science in Transition. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/science-2.0/science_2_0_final_report.pdf, дата обращения 19.06.2016.

Freedman L.P., Cockburn I.M., Simcoe T.S. (2015) The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research // PLoS Biology. Vol. 13. № 6. e1002165. Режим доступа: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=&type=printable, дата обращения 19.08.2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165

Guthrie S., Wamae W., Diepeveen S., Wooden S., Grant J. (2013) Measuring research: A guide to research evaluation frameworks and tools. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Режим доступа: http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1217.html, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Hayden E.C. (2012) Study challenges existence of arsenic-based life // Nature News. January 20. Режим доступа: http://www.nature.com/news/study-challenges-existence-of-arsenic-based-life-1.9861, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Heller M. (1998) The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition from Marx to Markets // Harvard Law Review. Vol. 111. P. 621-688.

Heller M. (2016) The Tragedy of the Anti-Commons. Режим доступа: http://www.countercurrents.org/2016/08/13/the-tragedy-of-the-anticommons/, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Holmes D. (2016) A new chapter in innovation // Nature. Vol. 533 (May 2016). Р. 54.

Hopkins M.M., Martin P.A., Nightingale P. (2007) The myth of the biotech revolution: An assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change // Research Policy. Vol. 36. № 4. P. 566-589.

Keserű J. (2015) A new approach to measuring the impact of open data // Sunlight Foundation blog, May 5. Режим доступа: https://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2015/05/05/a-new-approach-to-measuring-the-impact-of-open-data/, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Kidwell M.C., Lazarević L.B., Baranski E., Hardwicke T.E., Piechowski S., Falkenberg L.S., Kennett C., Slowik A., Sonnleitner C., Hess-Holden C., Errington T.M., Fiedler S., Nosek B.A. (2016) Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency // PLoS Biology. Vol. 14. № 5. e1002456. 10.1371/journal.pbio. 1002456. Режим доступа: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article/file?id=&type=printable, дата обращения 19.08.2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

Kleiner S., Horton R. (2014) How should medical science change? // Lancet. Vol. 383. № 9913. P. 197-198.

Lateral Economics (2016) Permission granted: The economic value of data assets under alternative policy regimes. A Lateral Economics report for the Open Data Institute. Режим доступа: https://www.scribd.com/document_downloads/309810679?extension=pdf&from=embed&source=embed, дата обращения 21.03.2017.

Macleod M.R., Michie S., Roberts I., Dirnagl U., Chalmers I., Ioannidis J.P.A., Salman R.A., Chan A., Glasziou P. (2014) Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste // Lancet. Vol. 383. № 9912. P. 101-104.

Manville C., Morgan Jones M., Frearson M., Castle-Clarke S., Henham M.-L., Gunashekar S., Grant J. (2015) Preparing impact submissions for REF 2014: An evaluation, findings and observations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Режим доступа: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR727.html, дата обращения 21.03.2017.

Marjanovic S., Robin E., Lichten C.A., Harte E., MacLure C., Parks S., Horvath V., Côté G., Roberge G., Rashid M. (2015) A Review of the Dementia Research Landscape and Workforce Capacity in the United Kingdom. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Режим доступа: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1100/RR1186/RAND_RR1186, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Marshall E. (2012) Patents. U.S. appeals court hears gene patent arguments // Science. Vol. 337. № 6092 (July 20). P. 277-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.337.6092.277

McKiernan E.C., Bourne P.E., Brown C.T., Buck S., Kenall A., Lin J., McDougall D., Nosek B.A., Ram K., Soderberg C.K., Spies J.R. (2016) How open science helps researchers succeed // eLife. Vol. 5. e16800. Режим доступа: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4973366/, дата обращения 21.03.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800

Moedas C. (2015) Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. Paper presented at the ‘A new start for Europe: Opening to an ERA of Innovation’ Conference, 22 June 2015, Brussels, SPEECH-15-5243. Режим доступа: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-15-5243_en.htm, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Morgan Jones M., Castle-Clarke S., Brooker D., Nason E., Huzair F., Chataway J. (2014) The Structural Genomics Consortium. A knowledge platform for drug discovery. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Режим доступа: http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR500/RR512/RAND_RR512.pdf, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

NESTA (2007) How innovation happens in six ‘low innovation’ sectors. London: NESTA.

Nelson R.R. (2004) The Market Economy and the Scientific Commons // Research Policy. Vol. 33. P. 455-471.

Netherlands EU Presidency (2016) Amsterdam Call for Action on Open Science. Publication of the Netherlands Presidency of the Council of the European Union, May 7, 2016. Режим доступа: http://english.eu2016.nl/binaries/eu2016-en/documents/reports/2016/04/04/amsterdam-call-for-action-on-open-science/amsterdam-call-for-action-on-open-science.pdf, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Open Science Collaboration (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science // Science. Vol. 349. № 6251. P. aac4716 - aac4716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716

Owen G., Hopkins M. (2016) Science, the state and the city: Britain’s struggle to succeed in biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Owen-Smith J., Powell W.W. (2003) The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences: Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity // Research Policy. Vol. 32. № 9. P. 1695-1711.

Savage N. (2016) Competition: Unlikely Partnerships // Nature. Vol. 533. № 7602. P. S56-S58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/533S56a

Stern N. (2016) Building on Success and Learning from Experience. An Independent Review of the Research Excellence Framework. London: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy of the UK Government.

Swan A., Gargouri Y., Hunt M., Harnad S. (2015) Open Access Policy: Numbers, Analysis, Effectiveness. Pasteur4OA Workpackage 3 Report. Brussels: European Comission. Режим доступа: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1504/1504.02261.pdf, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Tait J., Chataway J. (2007) The governance of corporations, technological change, and risk: Examining industrial perspectives on the development of genetically modified crops // Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy. Vol. 25. P. 21-37.

Taylor J., Marjanovic S., Nolte E., Pollitt A., Rubin J. (2015) Treatment for dementia: Learning from breakthroughs for other conditions. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Режим доступа: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR909.html, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Van den Eynden V., Bishop L. (2014) Incentives and motivations for sharing research data: A researcher’s perspective. Colchester (UK): University of Essex. Режим доступа: http://www.knowledge-exchange.info/event/sowing-the-seed, дата обращения 19.08.2016.

Vincent-Lamarre P., Boivin J., Gargouri Y., Larivière V., Harnad S. (2016) Estimating open access mandate effectiveness: The MELIBEA Score // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 67. № 11. P. 2815-2828. 10. 1002/asi.23601. Режим доступа: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1410/1410.2926.pdf, дата обращения 18.03.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23601

Yozwiak N.L., Schaffner S.F., Sabeti P.C. (2015) Make outbreak research open access // Nature. Vol. 518. № 7540. P. 477-479.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.