Service or Devotion? Motivation Patterns of Russian Researchers
PDF (Русский)
PDF

Keywords

doctorate holders
R&D
scientific personnel
research motivation
scientific career
science and technology management

How to Cite

ShmatkoN., & VolkovaG. (2017). Service or Devotion? Motivation Patterns of Russian Researchers. Foresight and STI Governance, 11(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.1.54.66

Abstract

Most current studies of high-skilled personnel argue that the intrinsic personal motivation is their main feature and this motivation has a non-linear connection with external management actions. In order to attract scientists to the sector of research and development, as well as to maintain the competitiveness of national science, a special environment must be created, which will encourage a high level of self-motivation among researchers. An analysis of motivation patterns of researchers provided in this paper is based on data from the international project, «Careers of Doctorate Holders», (CDH) and its Russian counterpart, «Monitoring survey of Highly Qualified R&D Personnel». One of the goals was to investigate the stability and variability of researcher’s motivation during the different periods of a career, such as professional choice, current work activity and a hypothetical situation of a job change.

The eight most common patterns of motivation were identified and they can be considered as the basic motivational structures of researchers. Most of these patterns include a focus on the creative and innovative nature of scientific work. The second important component is the independence and relative autonomy, which is typical for research activity. Economic motives are rarely important when choosing an academic career; however, they play an important instrumental role in the actual scientific work, since an appropriate material base is required for the successful achievement of a researcher’s professional goals. A hypothetical situation of a job change, including moving abroad (for a long or limited time) also shows the priority of internal personal motives over external ones, which are associated with the material conditions.

The opportunity for professional and personal achievements plays the role of a trigger for the high-level motivation of R&D personnel. The main drivers of research motivation are self-realization, improvement of skills and competences, therefore the professional environment must be organized properly to promote the advancement of intellectual workers. Management based primarily on the external rewards may even reduce personal motivation, since it transforms people’s natural enthusiasm and interest to only material goods. The obtained research results give us reason to argue that the Russian scientific policy agenda must include the creation and maintenance of adequate conditions in which research potential can be fully realized and where the personal reputation of the scientist will be recognized.

https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.1.54.66
PDF (Русский)
PDF

References

Auriol L. (2007) Labour market characteristics and international mobility of doctorate holders: Results for seven countries. STI Working Paper 2007/2. Paris: OECD.

Auriol L. (2010) Careers of Doctorate Holders: Employment and Mobility Patterns. STI Working Paper 2010/04. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: , дата обращения 26.01.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5kmh8phxvvf5-en

Auriol L., Misu M., Freeman R. (2013) Careers of Doctorate Holders: Analysis of Labour Market and Mobility Indicators. STI Working Paper 2013/04. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: , дата обращения 26.01.2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5k43nxgs289w-en

Blaskova M., Blasko R., Figurska I., Sokol A. (2015) Motivation and Development of the University Teachers' Motivational Competence // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 182. P. 116-126.

Boosten K., Vandevelde K., Derycke H., Te Kaat A., Van Rossem R. (2014) Careers of doctorate holders survey 2010. R&D and innovation in Belgium, Research Series 13. Brussels: Belgian Science Policy Office.

Bourdieu P. (1976) Le champ scientifique // Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. № 2-3. P. 88-104.

Brabander C.J., Martens R.L. (2014) Towards a unified theory of task-specific motivation // Educational Research Review. Vol. 11. P. 27-44.

Chughtai A.A., Buckley F. (2013) Exploring the impact of trust on research scientists' work engagement. Evidence from Irish science research centres // Personnel Review. Vol. 42. № 4. P. 396-421.

Cucu-Ciuhan G., Guita-Alexandru I. (2014) Organizational culture versus work motivation for the academic staff in a public university // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 127. P. 448-453.

Drucker P.F. (1988) The coming of the new organization // Harvard Business Review special issue on Knowledge Management. P. 1-19. Режим доступа: http://www.csis.ysu.edu/~rjohn/lectures2/week02/The_Coming_of_the_New_Organization.PDF, дата обращения 12.11.2016.

Gokhberg L., Kitova G., Kuznetsova T. (2016) Russian Researchers: Professional Values, Remuneration and Attitudes to Science Policy // The Science and Technology Labor Force: The Value of Doctorate Holders and Development of Professional Careers / Eds. L. Gokhberg, N. Shmatko, L. Auriol. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer International Publishing. P. 249-272.

Gokhberg L., Shmatko N., Auriol L. (eds.) (2016) The Science and Technology Labor Force: The Value of Doctorate Holders and Development of Professional Careers. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer International Publishing.

Herzberg F. (1964) The motivation-hygiene concept and problems of manpower // Personnel Administration. Vol. 27. P. 3-7.

Kanfer R., Ackerman P.L. (2000) Individual differences in work motivation: Further explorations of a trait framework // Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol. 49. № 3. P. 470-482.

Konrad E. (2000) Changes in Work Motivation During Transition - A Case from Slovenia // Applied Psychology: An International Review. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 619-635.

Lam A. (2011) What motivates academic scientists to engage in research commercialization: ‘Gold', ‘ribbon' or ‘puzzle'? // Research Policy. Vol. 40. № 10. P. 1354-1368.

Lotrecchiano G.R., Mallinson T.R., Leblanc-Beaudoin T., Schwartz L.S., Lazar D., Falk-Krzesinski H.J. (2016) Individual motivation and threat indicators of collaboration readiness in scientific knowledge producing teams: A scoping review and domain analysis // Heliyon. Vol. 2. № 5. e00105. Режим доступа: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4936491/, дата обращения 18.02.2017.

Maslow A.H. (1970) Motivation and Personality (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.

Mládková L. (2015) Knowledge Workers and the Principle of 3S (Self-management, Self-organization, Self-control) // Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 181. P. 178-184.

OECD (2012) Transferable Skills Training for Researchers. Supporting Career Development and Research. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2014) Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014. Paris: OECD.

OECD (2015) The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being. Paris: OECD.

Roe R., Zinovieva I., Dienes E., Horn L.T. (2000) A Comparison of Work Motivation in Bulgaria, Hungary, and the Netherlands - Test of a Model // Applied Psychology. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 658-687.

Ryan J.C. (2014) The work motivation of research scientists and its effect on research performance // R&D Management. Vol. 44. № 4. P. 355-369.

Ryan R.M., Deci E.L. (2000) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions // Contemporary Educational Psychology. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 54-67.

Shmatko N.A., Katchanov Y.L. (2016) Professional Careers and Mobility of Russian Doctorate Holders // The Science and Technology Labor Force: The Value of Doctorate Holders and Development of Professional Careers / Eds. L. Gokhberg, N. Shmatko, L. Auriol. Heidelberg; New York; Dordrecht; London: Springer International Publishing. P. 145-170.

Silverthorne C.P. (1992) Work Motivation in the United States, Russia, and the Republic of China (Taiwan): A Comparison // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Vol. 22. № 20. P. 1631-1639.

Tampoe M. (1993) Motivating Knowledge Workers - The Challenge for the 1990s // Long Range Planning. Vol. 26. № 3. P. 49-55.

Todericiu R., Serban A., Dimitrascu O. (2013) Particularities of Knowledge Worker's Motivation Strategies in Romanian Organizations // Procedia - Economics and Finance. Vol. 6. P. 405-413.

Trevelyan R. (2001) The Paradox of Autonomy: A Case of Academic Research Scientists // Human Relations. Vol. 54. № 4. P. 495-525.

Володарская Е., Лебедев С. (2001) Управление научной деятельностью (социально-психологические аспекты) // Высшее образование в России. № 1. C. 85-94.

Гохберг Л.М., Заиченко С.А., Китова Г.А., Кузнецова Т.Е. (2011) Научная политика: глобальный контекст и российская практика. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.

Гохберг Л.М., Китова Г.А., Кузнецова Т.Е., Шувалова О.Р. (2010) Российские ученые: штрихи к социологическому портрету. М.: ГУ-ВШЭ.

Гохберг Л.М., Ковалева Н.В., Миндели Л.Э., Некипелова Е.Ф. (1999) Квалифицированные кадры в России. М.: Центр исследований и статистики науки.

Душина С.А., Ломовицкая В.М. (2016) Социальные детерминанты карьеры молодых ученых в период реформирования российской науки (на материалах полевого исследования) // Социологический альманах. № 7. C. 187-198.

Качанов Ю.Л., Шматко Н.А. (2011) Структура мобильности научных кадров высшей квалификации: модель и результаты исследования. М.: Университетская книга.

Китова Г.А., Кузнецова Т.Е., Кузнецов Б.В. (1995) Мобильность научных кадров в России: масштабы, структура, последствия // Проблемы прогнозирования. № 4-5. С. 41-56.

Леонтьев А.Н. (1971) Потребности, мотивы и эмоции. М.: Издательство Московского университета.

Леонтьев А.Н. (2000) Лекции по общей психологии. М.: Издательство Московского университета.

Леонтьев Д.А. (1996) От социальных ценностей к личностным: социогенез и феноменология ценностной регуляции деятельности // Вестник Московского университета. Т. 14. С. 35-44.

ЦИСН (1993) Развитие науки в России. М.: Центр исследований и статистики науки.

Шматко Н.А. (2011) Научный капитал как драйвер социальной мобильности ученых // Форсайт. Т. 5. № 3. C. 18-32.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.