Abstract
The paper analyzes the contribution of public policy to the open innovation process. Innovation processes are dynamic and global. Actors must adapt their strategies to new contexts, including the increasingly knowledge-based global competition. They must reconcile the need for speed in commercial exploitation of new products in order to ensure continuous investments with long lead-time in the development of radical innovation capabilities. For the world leaders in their industries, suppliers are becoming ever more important not only as sources but also contributors to innovation, which requires complementary and open interaction between the private sector and public research. The trend is toward open innovation processes, that make possible the overcoming of geographic, institutional and disciplinary barriers.
It discusses new approaches to innovation management in the framework of the "open innovation paradigm," which include the following: an output-, or result-, orientation regardless of the place of generation and origin of inputs to innovation; the optimization of all aspects of innovation processes; synchronization of company’s internal innovation strategies with that of external partners; and knowledge sharing through partnerships. The open innovation model is aimed at seizing benefits from networking by all collaborators, irrespective of their size and activity.
The authors provide general recommendations on the policy mix to foster innovation in the commercial sector and the public research. These include strengthening the connection between basic and applied research, promotion of networking and strategic collaborative projects, and special emphasis on supporting small and medium enterprises.
References
Bianchi M., Cavaliere A., Chiaroni D., Frattini F., Chiesa V. (2011) Organisational Modes for Open Innovation in the Bio-pharmaceutical Industry: An Exploratory Analysis // Technovation. Vol. 31. P. 22-33.
Brockhoff K. (1998) Internationalization of Research Development. Berlin: Springer.
Caetano M., Amaral D.C. (2011) Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: A contribution for open innovation environments //Technovation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.005
Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F. (2011) The Open Innovation Journey: How Firms Dynamically Implement the Emerging Innovation Management Paradigm // Technovation. Vol. 31. P. 34-43.
Coe D.T., Helpman E., Hoffmaister A.W. (2009) International R&D spillovers and institutions // European Economic Review. Vol. 53. P. 723-741.
Cooke P. (2005) Regionally asymmetric knowledge capabilities and open innovation. Exploring Globalisation 2-A new model of industry organization // Research Policy. Vol. 34. P. 1128-1149.
Dahlander L., Gann D.M. (2010) How open is innovation? // Research Policy. Vol. 39. P. 699-709.
Doring T., Schnellenbach J. (2004) What Do We Know About Geographical Knowledge Spillovers and Regional Growth? - A Survey of the Literature. Deutsche Bank Research, Research Notes, Working Paper Series, October 12, № 14.
EIRMA (2004) Technology Access for Open Innovation. WG63 Report. Paris.
European Commission (2005) Annual Digest of Industrial Research. Background Document. Brussels.
Fallick B., Fleischman C.A., Rebitzer J.B. (2004) Job-Hopping in Silicon Valley: The Micro-Foundations of a High Technology Cluster // The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 88. № 3. Р. 472-481.
Ferrary M. (2011) Specialized organizations and ambidextrous clusters in the open innovation paradigm // European Management Journal. Vol. 29. P. 181-192.
Franco C., Montresor S., Marzetti G.V. (2011) On Indirect Trade-Related R&D Spillovers: The Average Propagation Length of Foreign R&D. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics (forthcoming).
Fritsch M., Franke G. (2004) Innovation, Regional Knowledge Spillovers and R&D Cooperation. Research Policy. Vol. 33. P. 245-255.
Guinet J. (2010) The Changing Role of Government Research Institutes in Innovation Systems // STI Policy Review. Vol. 1. № 1. Р. 63-92.
Harison E.; Koski H. (2009) Applying open innovation in business strategies: Evidence from Finnish software firms // Research Policy. Vol. 39. P. 351-359.
Huizingh E. (2011) Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives // Technovation. Vol. 31. P. 2-9.
Kesidou E., Szirmai A. (2007) Local Knowledge Spillovers, Innovation and Economic Performance in Developing Countries: Empirical Evidence from the Uruguay Software Cluster. Paper presented at UNU-MERIT conference on Micro Evidence on Innovation in Developing Economies, Maastricht (Netherlands), May 31 - June 1.
Kim J.W., Lee H.K. (2004) Embodied and disembodied international spillovers of R&D in OECD manufacturing industries (short survey) // Technovation. Vol. 24. P. 359-368.
Kuemmerle W. (1997) Building Effective R&D Capabilities Abroad // Harvard Business Review, March-April.
Lee G. (2005) Direct versus indirect international R&D spillovers // Information Economics and Policy. Vol. 17. P. 334-348.
Lee S.P., Gwangman Y., Byungun P.J. (2010) Open innovation in SMEs - An intermediated network model // Research Policy. Vol. 39. P. 290-300.
Lichtenthaler U. (2010) Technology exploitation in the context of open innovation: Finding the right job for your technology //Technovation. Vol. 30. P. 429-435.
Liu X., Buck T. (2007) Innovation performance and channels for international technology spillovers: Evidence from Chinese high-tech industries // Research Policy. Vol. 36. P. 355-366.
Lopez-Pueyo C., Barcenilla-Visus S., Sanayu J. (2008) International R&D spillovers and manufacturing productivity: A panel data analysis // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Vol. 19. P. 152-172.
MacPherson A., Pritchard D. (2003) The International Decentralisation of US Commercial Aircraft Production: Implications for US Employment and Trade // Futures. Vol. 35.
Mancusi M.L. (2008) International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations // Journal of International Economics. Vol. 76. P. 155-165.
Niosi J., Zhegu M. (2005) Aerospace Clusters: Local or Global Knowledge Spillovers? // Industry and Innovation. Vol. 12. № 1 (March). P. 1-25.
OECD (2004) Networks, Partnerships, Clusters and Intellectual Property Rights: Opportunities and Challenges for Innovative SMEs in a Global Economy. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2008a) Open Innovation in Global Networks. Paris: OECD.
Patel P. (1997) Localised Production of Technology for Global Markets // Archibugi D., Michie J. (eds.) Globalization and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peri G. (2003) Knowledge Flows, R&D Spillovers and Innovation. ZEW Discussion Paper № 03-40. Mannheim.
Simmie J. (2003) Innovation and Urban Regions as National and International Nodes for the Transfer and Sharing of Knowledge //Regional Studies. Vol. 37. № 6-7. Р. 607-620.
Spithoven A., Clarysse B., Knockaert M. (2010) Building absorptive capacity to organise inbound open innovation in traditional industries // Technovation. Vol. 30. P. 130-141.
UNCTAD (2005) World Investment Report 2005: Transnational Corporations and the Internationalization of R&D. New York, Geneva.
Wang M.-C.; Fang C.-R.; Huang L. (2009) International knowledge spillovers and wage inequality in developing countries // Economic Modelling. Vol. 26. P. 1208-214.
van de Vrande V., de Jong J.P.J., Vanhaverbeke W., de Rochemont M. (2009) Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges // Technovation. Vol. 29. P. 423-437.
van den Biesen J. (2008) Open Innovation at Philips Research. Paper presented at the Business Symposium Open Innovation in Global Networks organised by the OECD and the Danish Enterprise and Construction Authority, Copenhagen, February 25-26, 2008.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.