Keywords
entrepreneurial ecosystem
opportunity identification and transformation
window of opportunity
ICT sector
How to Cite
Abstract
The present paper aims to develop an understanding of interconnections between the entrepreneurial ecosystem and entrepreneurial opportunity. The first step of this research was to disclose the development of the ecosystem within two higher (efficiency- and innovation-driven) stages of economic development and the transition between them according to the World Economic Forum, based on the model by Dutch researcher Erik Stam. The Estonian entrepreneurial ecosystem was analyzed as an example. Secondary data on Estonian entrepreneurial ecosystems were collected and analyzed.
In its second step, this research follows a case-study design. The start-up period of the studied Estonian companies represents different degrees of the maturity of the ecosystem: Regio and Mobi Solutions – efficiency-driven, GrabCAD – the transition from efficiency to innovation-driven, and Bolt (Taxify) – an innovation-driven economy.
The example of the Estonian ICT sector proves that the most important contributors to the talent growth, the knowledge base, and framework conditions of the entrepreneurial ecosystem are the state through its infrastructure decisions and educational programs along with successful entrepreneurs who shape the role models known in Estonia today as the Skype-effect. Decisions on digital telecom infrastructure and e-society in the early stage of the transition in tandem with enterprise encouragement created a subsequent boom in ICT-based ventures in Estonia 10-15 years later. The processes resulted in achieving an innovation-driven society and the highest level of opportunity-driven entrepreneurship in Europe in 2017. With that, new venture funding has replaced the former development engine – foreign direct investment (FDI).
Examples of ICT-based new ventures have demonstrated that the growing maturity of the ecosystem increased venture investment from “bootstrapping” to millions of euros of seed-funding and shortened new product development cycles from 5-7 to 1-3 years. The study shows that maturing ecosystems shorten business development processes, thereby increasing the integration of different ecosystems. The start-up success stories enhance trust in the particular business environment, and they both increase investments and accelerate the entry of new ventures, making better use of the emerging windows of opportunities.
References
Alvarez A., Barney B. (2007) Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action // Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal. Vol. 1. P. 11-26.
Casson M. (1982) The Entrepreneur: An Economic Theory. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
Cohen B. (2006) Sustainable Valley Entrepreneurial Ecosystems // Business Strategy and the Environment. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 1-14.
Curram B. M. (2011) An Interview of GrabCAD's Indrek Narusk. Режим доступа: http://www.draftingservices.com/blog/aninterviewofgrabcadsindreknarusk, дата обращения 27.10.2015.
Davidsson P. (2015) Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 30. № 5. P. 1-22.
Dimov D. (2011) Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities // Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Vol. 35. № 1. P. 57-81.
Dimov D., Munoz P. (2015) The call of the whole in understanding the development of sustainable ventures // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 30. № 4. P. 632-654.
EDF (2013) Smart Specialisation - Qualitative Analysis. Режим доступа: http://www.arengufond.ee, дата обращения 03.06.2019.
European Commission (2017) European Innovation Scoreboard 2017. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://www.eustat.eus/elementos/ele0014400/Methodology_Report_EIS_2017/inf0014422_c.pdf, дата обращения 10.06.2018.
Foster G., Shimizu C., Ciesinski S., Davila A., Hassan S.Z., Jia N., Plunkett S., Pinelli M., Cunningham J., Hiscock-Croft R., McLenithan M. Rottenberg L., Morris R., Lee D. (2013) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Freedomhouse (2017) Freedom on the Net. Режим доступа: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/2017/estonia, дата обращения 01.05.2019.
GEDI (2014) Towards a More Entrepreneurial Estonia. Call for Action. Washington, D.C.: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute.
GEM (2016-2018) Reports of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. Режим доступа: www.gemconsortium.org, дата обращения 31.05.2019.
Harma K. (2019) TransferWise'i vaartus tousis 3,5 miljardi dollarini: oma osa saavad tootajad ja investorid [The value of TransferWise rose to $ 3.5 billion: employees and investors get their share] // Aripaev [Business Daily]. 22.05.2019. Режим доступа: https://www.aripaev.ee/uudised/2019/05/22/transferwisei-vaartus-tousis-35-miljardi-dollarini-oma-osa-saavad-tootajad-ja-investorid, дата обращения: 23.06.2019 (in Estonian).
Isenberg D. (2011) The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economy policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Babson Park: MA: Babson College.
Isenberg D.J. (2010) How to start an entrepreneurial revolution // Harvard Business Review. June. P. 41-50.
Lepane L., Kuum L. (2004) Enterprise of Estonian Population. Tallinn: Estonian Institute of Economic Research (in Estonian).
Mason C., Brown R. (2014) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship. LEED Working Paper. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: https://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Entrepreneurial-ecosystems.pdf, дата обращения 22.05.2019.
Messica A., Mehrez A. (2002) Time-to-Market, Window of Opportunity, and Salvageability of a New Product Development // Managerial and Decision Economics. Vol. 23. P. 371-378.
Mets T. (2008) Regio - a learned global knowledge company: Case from Estonia // The Cutting Edge: Innovation and Entrepreneurship in New Europe / Eds. R. Aidis, F. Welter. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 54-73.
Mets T. (2016) Is Estonia becoming better home for ‘born globals'? // Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Regional Development / Eds. D. Smallbone, M. Virtanen, A. Sauka. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 101-124.
Mets T. (2018) Entrepreneurial developments toward a knowledge-based economy in Estonia. The case of Fits.me - venture-capital-backed startup going global // Entrepreneurship in Central and Eastern Europe: Development through Internationalization / Eds. T. Mets, A. Sauka, D. Purg. London, New York: Routledge. P. 89-111.
Mets T., Trabskaja J., Raudsaar M. (2019) The entrepreneurial journey of venture creation: Reshaping process and space // Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda Epoca. № 1. P. 61-77.
OECD (2017) Entrepreneurship at a Glance. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/entrepreneurship-at-a-glance-2017_entrepreneur_aag-2017-en, дата обращения 25.05.2019.
OECD (2018) Country statistical profile: Estonia 2018. Режим доступа: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/country-statistical-profile-estonia-2018-3_csp-est-table-2018-3-en, дата обращения 25.05.2019.
Pashchynska M. (2018) The Role of Work Experience in The New Business Success in Estonia: The Skype Effect and Beyond (Master's thesis). Tartu: University of Tartu.
Rostow W.W. (1962) The Stages of Economic Growth. London: Cambridge University Press.
Roundy P., Bradshaw M., Brockman B. (2018) The emergence of entrepreneurial ecosystems: A complex adaptive systems approach // Journal of Business Research. Vol. 86. P. 1-10.
Shane S. (2003) A General Theory of Entrepreneurship: The Individual-Opportunity Nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Shane S., Venkataraman S. (2000) The Promise of Enterpreneurship as a Field of Research // The Academy of Management Review. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 217-226.
Stam E. (2015) Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Regional Policy: A Sympathetic Critique // European Planning Studies. Vol. 23. № 9. P. 1759-1769.
Startup Blink (2019) Startup Ecosystem Rankings 2019. Режим доступа: https://www.startupblink.com/blog/startup-ecosystem-rankings-report-2019-by-startupblink/, дата обращения 27.06.2019.
Statistics Estonia (2018) Quarterly Bulletin of Statistics Estonia. Issue 2. Tallinn: Statistics Estonia. Режим доступа: https://www.stat.ee/publication-download-pdf?publication_id=44735&publication_lang=en, дата обращения 21.06.2019.
Suarez F., Grodal S., Gotsopoulos S. (2015) Perfect timing? Dominant category, dominant design, and the window of opportunity for firm entry // Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 36. P. 437-448.
Treija I. (2016) Uber, what? Taxify is the most popular taxi startup in the Baltics. Режим доступа: http://www.eu-startups.com/2016/02/uber-what-taxiy-is-the-most-popular-taxi-startup-in-the-baltics/, дата обращения 22.04.2019.
Venkataraman S. (2004) Regional transformation through technical entrepreneurship // Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 19. P. 153-167.
WEF (2014) Global Competitiveness Report 2014-2015. Geneva World Economic Forum.
WEF (2018) Global Competitiveness Report 2018. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
World Bank (2017) World Development Report 2017. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.