Keywords
technological capabilities
research and development
innovation
corporate political activity
corporate investment
uncertainty
quantile regression
How to Cite
Abstract
This research endeavors to elucidate the dynamics between Corporate Political Activity (CPA) and corporate investment by harnessing advanced econometric techniques, specifically quantile regression and dynamic panel data analysis. The empirical investigation encompasses a comprehensive dataset of 368 entities listed in Fortune World's Most Admired Companies spanning from 2016 to 2022. The empirical results illuminate the intricate relationship between CPA and corporate investment, indicating that firms engaging in politically strategic maneuvers typically demonstrate elevated investment rates in comparison to their counterparts devoid of such political strategization. Notably, this inquiry unveils a complex pattern, whereby CPA exerts a detrimental impact on corporate investment at superior quantiles (notably, the 80th and 90th percentiles), whereas an inverse effect is observed at the lower quantiles (specifically, the 10th and 20th percentiles). Furthermore, the analysis delineates an inverted V-shaped correlation between CPA and corporate investment, suggesting a nuanced interaction that varies across different levels of investment intensity. In examining firm-specific attributes, the influence of CPA on corporate investment appears to attenuate in entities characterized by substantial size and robust economic and technical prowess. Such firms exhibit diminished dependency on governmental support for their investment ventures, highlighting the differential impact of CPA based on firm-specific characteristics and strategic dispositions.
References
Alok S., Ayyagari M. (2020) Politics, state ownership, and corporate investments. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(7), 3031-3087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz102
An H., Chen Y., Luo D., Zhang T. (2016) Political uncertainty and corporate investment: Evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 174-189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2015.11.003
Anastasiadis S., Moon J., Humphreys M. (2018) Lobbying and the responsible firm: Agenda-setting for a freshly conceptualized field. Business Ethics, 27(3), 207-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12180(2)
Ashyrov G., Lukason O. (2022) Political Connectedness and Financial Performance of SMEs. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(12), 600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15120600
Barnett M.L., Salomon R.M. (2006) Beyond dichotomy: The curvilinear relationship between social responsibility and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1101-1122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.557
Bertrand J., Perrin C. (2024) Does Corporate Political Activity (Really) Reduce Discouragement? The Paradox of Women-Led Firms (SSRN paper 4743152). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4743152
Beugelsdijk S., Cornet M. (2002) A Far Friend is Worth More than a Good Neighbour': Proximity and Innovation in a Small Country. Journal of Management & Governance, 6, 169-188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015775321949.
Bhagat S., Bolton B. (2008) Firm size and the effectiveness of the market for corporate control. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14, 257-273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.006
Bliss M.A., Gul F.A. (2012) Political connection and cost of debt: Some Malaysian evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(5), 1520-1527. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.12.011
Blundell R., Bond S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00009-8
Blundell R., Bond S. (2000) GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474930008800475
Bonardi J.P. (2003) Global and political strategies in deregulated industries: The asymmetric behaviors of former monopolies. Strategic Management Journal, 25(2), 101-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.367
Brown L.W., Liou R.S., Hasija D. (2023) Emerging market multinational corporations' cross-border mergers and acquisitions and political distance: Does corporate political activity matter?. Thunderbird International Business Review, 65(5), 533-546. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22355
Byrd R.C. (1991) The Senate, 1789-1989 (vol. II), Washington, D.C.: United States Senate.
Chernozhukov V., Hansen C. (2005) An IV model of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica, 73(1), 245-261. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3598944.
Child J. (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857200600101
Cooper M.J., Gulen H., Ovtchinnikov A.V. (2010) Corporate political contributions and stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 65(2), 687-724. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25656307.
Czarnitzki D., Toole A.A. (2007) Business R&D and the interplay of R&D subsidies and product market uncertainty. Review of Industrial Organization, 31(3), 169-181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-007-9152-x
Danaei A., Jabbari M., Omidifar L. (2013) Strategic planning and performance measurement using Fuzzy DEMATEL: A case study of Iran Kaolin and Barite company. Decision Science Letters, 2(4), 231-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/J.DSL.2013.05.003
Denisov D. (2010) Business lobbying and government relations in Russia: The need for new principles (Reuters Institute Fellowship Paper), Oxford: University of Oxford.
Faccio M. (2010) Differences between politically connected and nonconnected firms: A cross-country analysis. Financial Management, 39(3), 905-928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01099.x
Fan J.P., Wong T.J., Zhang T. (2007) Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008
Firpo S., Fortin N., Lemieux T. (2009) Unconditional quantile regressions. Econometrica, 77(3), 953-973. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40263848.
Fung S.Y., Gul F.A., Radhakrishnan S. (2015) Corporate political connections and the 2008 Malaysian election. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 67-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.04.001
Funk R.J., Hirschman D. (2017) Beyond nonmarket strategy: Market actions as corporate political activity. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 32-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24906274.
Galvao A.F. (2011) Quantile regression for dynamic panel data with fixed effects. Journal of Econometrics, 164(1), 142-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.02.016
Getz K.A. (1997) Research in corporate political action: Integration and assessment. Business & Society, 36(1), 32-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039703600103
Goldman E., Rocholl J., So J. (2009) Do politically connected boards affect firm value?. The Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331-2360. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30225718.
Goldstraw-White J., Martin G. (2016) Tackling bribery and corruption in the Middle East: Perspectives from the front line. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 843-854. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2015-0040
Gomez E.T., Padmanabhan T., Kamaruddin N., Bhalla S., Fisal F. (2017) Minister of finance incorporated: Ownership and control of corporate Malaysia, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
Guedhami O., Pittman J.A., Saffar W. (2014) Auditor choice in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 107-162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12032
Gulen H., Ion M. (2016) Policy uncertainty and corporate investment. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(3), 523-564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050
Hadani M., Bonardi J.P., Dahan N.M. (2017) Corporate political activity, public policy uncertainty, and firm outcomes: A meta-analysis. Strategic Organization, 15(3), 338-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127016651001
Hart D.M. (2001) Why do some firms give? Why do some give a lot?: High-tech PACs, 1977-1996. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1230-1249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00108
Hill C.W., Snell S.A. (1988) External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 577-590. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090605
Hill M.D., Kelly G.W., Lockhart G.B., Van Ness R.A. (2013) Determinants and Effects of Corporate Lobbying. Financial Management, 42(4), 931-957. http://www.jstor.org/stable/43280520.
Hillman A.J., Keim G.D. (2001) Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125-139. :2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22
Hillman B. (2005) Monastic politics and the local state in China: Authority and autonomy in an ethnically Tibetan prefecture. The China Journal, (54), 29-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20066065
Hoskisson R.E., Hitt M.A., Johnson R.A., Moesel D.D. (1993) Construct validity of an objective (entropy) categorical measure of diversification strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 215-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140305
Houston J.F., Jiang L., Lin C., Ma Y. (2014) Political connections and the cost of bank loans. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 193-243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12038
Hyytinen A., Toivanen O. (2005) Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth?: Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy, 34(9), 1385-1403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.06.004
Jackowicz K., Kozłowski Ł., Mielcarz P. (2014) Political connections and operational performance of non-financial firms: New evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 20, 109-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2014.06.005
Khaw K.L.H., Zainudin R., Rashid R.M. (2019) Cost of debt financing: Does political connection matter?. Emerging Markets Review, 41(C). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2019.100632
Koenker R., Bassett G. (1982) Robust tests for heteroscedasticity based on regression quantiles. Econometrica, 43-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1912528
Lawton T., McGuire S., Rajwani T. (2013) Corporate political activity: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 86-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00337.x
Lee J.Y., Jiménez A., Choi S., Choi Y.H. (2022) Ideological polarization and corporate lobbying activity: The contingent impact of corruption distance. Journal of Business Research, 141, 448-461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.047
Lin J., Si S.X. (2010) Can guanxi be a problem? Contexts, ties, and some unfavorable consequences of social capital in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(3), 561-581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-010-9198-4
Lin W.L. (2019) Do firm's organisational slacks influence the relationship between corporate lobbying and corporate financial performance? More is not always better. International Journal of Financial Studies, 7(1), 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs7010002
Lin W.L. (2020) Giving too much and paying too little? The effect of corporate social responsibility on corporate lobbying efficacy: Evidence of tax aggressiveness. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 908-924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2098
Lin W.L., Sambasivan M., Ho J.A., Law S.H. (2019) Corporate Political Activity and Financial Performance: A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective. In: Proceedings of the International Symposia in Economic Theory and Econometrics ‘Asia-Pacific Contemporary Finance and Development' (vol. 26), pp. 235-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S1571-038620190000026012
Liou R.-S., Brown L.W., Hasija D. (2021) Political animosity in cross-border acquisitions: EMNCs' market and nonmarket strategy in a developed market. Multinational Business Review, 29(4), 451-475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-02-2020-0034
Liu H., Yang J.Y., Augustine D. (2018) Political ties and firm performance: The effects of proself and prosocial engagement and institutional development. Global Strategy Journal, 8(3), 471-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1194
Lux S., Crook T.R., Woehr D.J. (2011) Mixing business with politics: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and outcomes of corporate political activity. Journal of Management, 37(1), 223-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310392233
Ma Y., Xue L. (2024) Organizational legitimacy and firm nonmarket strategies as catalysts of alliance green management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 447, 141315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141315
Massaro M. (2019) Is business lobbying in the European Union context-dependent? Evidence from the policy field of radio spectrum. Telecommunications Policy, 43(10), 101827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101827
Mitnick B.M. (1993) Corporate political agency: The construction of competition in public affairs, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ozer M., Markóczy L. (2010) Complementary or alternative? The effects of corporate political strategy on innovation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 3(3), 252-272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/17554251011064846
Piotroski J.D., Wong T.J., Zhang T. (2015) Political incentives to suppress negative information: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 53(2), 405-459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12071
Ramesh V.K. (2024) Does economic and policy uncertainty impact corporate policies? Evidence from India. Indian Growth and Development Review, 17(1), 43-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IGDR-09-2022-0107
Romann E. (2020) Nonmarket Strategy in Japan: How Foreign Firms Lobby Inside the Castle (1st ed.), New York: Macmillan.
Roodman D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86-136.
Rudy B.C., Cavich J. (2020) Nonmarket signals: Investment in corporate political activity and the performance of initial public offerings. Business & Society, 59(3), 419-438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317717263
Shi W., Hoskisson R.E., Zhang Y. (2020) Corporate political activities and firm performance: Evidence from China. Management and Organization Review, 16(1), 107-137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2018.38
Shleifer A., Vishny R.W. (1994) Politicians and firms. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4), 995-1025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2118354
Slater S., Lawrence M., Wood B., Serodio P., Baker P. (2024) Corporate interest groups and their implications for global food governance: mapping and analysing the global corporate influence network of the transnational ultra-processed food industry. Globalization and Health, 20(16), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01020-4
Sutton T., Devine R.A., Lamont B.T., Holmes R.M. (2021) Resource dependence, uncertainty, and the allocation of corporate political activity across multiple jurisdictions. Academy of Management Journal, 64(1), 38-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1258
Taylor C. (1997) The politics of recognition. In: New Contexts of Canadian Criticism (ed. A. Gutman), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 25-73.
Tee C. (2018) The Gülen Movement in London and the politics of public engagement: Producing ‘good Islam' before and after 15 July. Politics, Religion & Ideology, 19(1), 109-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2018.1453269
Tyler B., Lahneman B., Cerrato D., Cruz A.D., Beukel K., Spielmann N., Minciullo M. (2023) Environmental practice adoption in SMEs: The effects of firm proactive orientation and regulatory pressure, Journal of Small Business Management, 2218435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2023.2218435
Wang D., Sutherland D., Ning L., Wang Y., Pan X. (2018) Exploring the influence of political connections and managerial overconfidence on R&D intensity in China's large-scale private sector firms. Technovation, 69, 40-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.10.007
Wooldridge J.M. (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wu J., Li S., Li Z. (2013) The contingent value of CEO political connections: A study on IPO performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(4), 1087-1114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-012-9300-1
Xu X., Yan Y. (2020) Effect of political connection on corporate environmental investment: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Applied Economics Letters, 27(18), 1515-1521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2019.1693692
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.