Keywords
data envelopment analysis
patents
merger and acquisition
RnD
How to Cite
Abstract
In this paper we propose a methodology for assessing the efficiency of technology transfer through merger and acquisition (M&A) and empirically estimate the effect of key factors impacting it. We implement data envelopment analysis (DEA) to calculate an efficiency score of the technology transfer process. The DEA efficiency score integrates a set of outputs (post-merger characteristics of an acquirer) and inputs (pre-merger technological parameters of a target); thus, it provides a multidimensional estimate of efficiency adjusted for the value of the acquired technology base.In the empirical part of this research, we collect data from 434 M&As to study a channel for transferring a technology base across organizational boundaries. Overall, empirical results suggest the adverse outcomes of accumulation of capability to value external technology: the higher the acquirer’s R&D intensity, the lower the efficiency of interorganizational technology transfer. The size of acquirer and relative size of the deal also affect the post-merger outcomes significantly and negatively. At the same time, the estimated effect of such technological characteristics of acquirer as capital expenditure intensity and number of patents is insignificant.
References
Ahuja G., Katila R. (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
Apriliyanti I.D., Alon I.I. (2017) Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity. International Business Review, 26(5), 896-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.007
Asquith P., Bruner R.F., Mullins D.W. (1983) The gains to bidding firms from merger. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 121-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90007-7
Balsmeier B., Fleming L., Manso G. (2017) Independent boards and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.005
Bena J., Li K. (2014) Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69, 1923-1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12059
Bengoa A., Maseda A., Iturralde T., Aparicio G. (2021) A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 1514-1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09774-5
Berchicci L. (2013) Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
Bettinazzi E., Zollo M. (2017) Stakeholder orientation and acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2465-2485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2672
Boateng A., Qian W., Tianle Y. (2008) Cross-border M&As by Chinese firms: An analysis of strategic motives and performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(4), 259-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20203
Bogetoft P. (2000) DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1), 7-48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007812822633.
Boh W.F., Evaristo R., Ouderkirk A. (2014) Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story. Research Policy, 43(2), 349-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.009
Bresman H., Birkinshaw J., Nobel R. (1999) Knowledge transfers in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078
Brettel M., Greve G.I., Flatten T.C. (2011) Giving up linearity: Absorptive capacity and performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23(2), 164-189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23209224.
Buono A.F. (1997) Technology transfer through acquisition. Management Decision, 35(3), 194-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749710169404
Bushman R.M., Smith A.J., Zhang F. (2011) Investment cash flow sensitivities really reflect related investment decisions (SSRN Paper 842085). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.842085
Capobianco A. (2020) Start-ups, killer acquisitions, and merger control - background note, Paris: OECD.
Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chaudhari S., Batra S. (2018) Absorptive capacity and small family firm performance: Exploring the mediation processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1201-1216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0047
Chen J., Chen Y., Vanhaverbeke W. (2011) The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002
Christofi M., Vrontis D., Thrassou A., Shams S.R. (2019) Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 148-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.026
Cloodt M., Hagedoorn J., Van Kranenburg H. (2006) Mergers and Acquisitions: Their Effect on the Innovative Performance of Companies in High-Tech Industries. Research Policy, 35, 642-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.007
Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Colombo M.G., Grilli L., Piva E. (2006) In Search of Complementary Assets: The Determinants of Alliance Formation of High-Tech Start-Ups. Research Policy, 35(8), 1166-1199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.002
Colombo M.G., Rabbiosi L. (2014) Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions. Research Policy, 43(6), 1039-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.013
Cooper W., Seiford L., Zhu J. (2011) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8_1
Cunningham C., Ederer F., Ma S. (2021) Killer acquisitions. Journal of Political Economy, 129(3), 649-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/712506
Danbolt J. (2004) Target company cross-border effects in acquisitions into the UK. European Financial Management, 10(1), 83-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2004.00241.x
Dang C., Li Z.F., Yang C. (2018) Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
Desyllas P., Hughes A. (2010) Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? Research Policy, 39(8), 1105-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005
Du M., Boateng A. (2015) State ownership, institutional effects and value creation in cross-border mergers & acquisitions by Chinese firms. International Business Review, 24(3), 430-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.002
Fama E. (1970) Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Ferrari S., Cribari-Neto F. (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501
Flatten T.C., Engelen A., Zahra S.A., Brettel M. (2011) A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.11.002
George G., Kotha R., Zheng Y. (2008) Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1448-1474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00805.x
George G., Zahra S.A., Wheatley K.K., Khan R. (2001) The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance. A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), 205-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(01)00037-2
Gu L. (2016) Product market competition, R&D investment, and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2), 441-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.09.008
Hagedoorn J. (1993) Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganisational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505
Hagedoorn J., Duysters G. (2002) The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 14(1), 67-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320220125892
Hanelt A., Firk S., Hildebrandt B., Kolbe L.M. (2021) Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1747365
Harford J., Li K. (2007) Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 917-949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01227.x
Haucap J., Rasch A., Stiebale J. (2019) How mergers affect innovation: Theory and evidence. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63, 283-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.10.003
Henderson R., Cockburn I. (1996) Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. The RAND Journal of Economics, 27(1), 32-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4466
Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Ireland R.D., Harrison J.S. (1991) Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 693-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256412
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P., Yang J. (2022) Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing. Research Policy, 51(1), 104417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104417
Hussinger K. (2010) On the importance of technological relatedness: SMEs versus large acquisition targets. Technovation, 30(1), 57-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.006
Jiménez-Barrionuevo M.M., García-Morales V.J., Molina L.M. (2011) Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5-6), 190-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.002
King D.R., Wang G., Samimi M., Cortes A.F. (2021) A meta-analytic integration of acquisition performance prediction. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1198-1236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12636
Korhonen P., Stenfors S., Syrjänen M. (2003) Multiple objective approach as an alternative to radial projection in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027351816946.
Lafuent E., Berbegal-Mirabent J. (2019) Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: An analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 778-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9604-x
Laursen K., Salter A. (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Jornal, 27(2), 131-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Lee S.-C., Liang H., Liu C.-Y. (2010) The effects of absorptive capacity, knowledge sourcing strategy, and alliance forms on firm performance. The Service Industries Journal, 30(14), 2421-2440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802635551
Lichtenthaler U. (2016) Determinants of absorptive capacity: The value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(5), 600-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2015-0076
Lichtenthaler U., Lichtenthaler E. (2010) Technology Transfer across Organizational Boundaries: Absorptive Capacity and Desorptive Capacity. California Management Review, 53(1), 154-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.53.1.154
Liu F., Dutta D.K., Park K. (2021) From external knowledge to competitive advantage: Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the mediating role of labour productivity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(1), 18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1787373
Ma C., Liu Z. (2016) Effects of M&As on innovation performance: empirical evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing enterprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(8), 960-972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1260104
MacKinlay C.A. (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729691.
Maditinos D., Chatzoudes D., Tsairidis C., Theriou G. (2011) The impact of intellectual capital on firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 132-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097944
Maksimovic V., Phillips G., Prabhala R.N. (2011) Post-merger restructuring and the boundaries of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 317-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.013
Moeller S.B., Schlingemann F.P., Stulz R.M. (2004) Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.07.002
Motta M., Peitz M. (2021) Big Tech Mergers. Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100868
Ng D., Sanchez-Aragon L.F. (2022) Putting the cart (antecedents) before the horse (absorptive capacity): The role of competitive antecedents to the absorptive capacity innovation process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(9), 2306-2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2021-0518
Renneboog L., Vansteenkiste C. (2019) Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 650-699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.010
Rong Z., Xiao S. (2017) Innovation-related diversification and firm value. European Financial Management, 23(3), 475-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12110
Rossi M., Tarba S.Y., Raviv A. (2013) Mergers and acquisitions in the hightech industry: A literature review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(1), 66-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831311322542
Sears J., Hoetker G. (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 48-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2083
Seth A., Song K.P., Pettit R.R. (2002) Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: An empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of US firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 921-940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.264
Shin S., Han J., Marhold K., Kang J. (2017) Reconfiguring the firm's core technological portfolio through open innovation: Focusing on technological M&A. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 571-591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0295
Simar L., Wilson P.W. (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007864806704.
Stoneman P. (2001) The economics of technological diffusion, New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stoneman P., Kwon M.J. (1996) Technology adoption and firm profitability. Economic Journal, 106, 952-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235366
Sun Y., Zhai Y. (2018) Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: A scientometric review. Scientometrics, 116, 203-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2748-0
Szücs F. (2014) M&A and R&D: Asymmetric effects on acquirers and targets? Research Policy, 43(7), 1264-1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.007
Tremblay V.J., Tremblay C.H. (2012) Horizontal, vertical, and conglomerate mergers. In: New perspectives on industrial organization (eds. V.J. Tremblay, C.H. Tremblay), New York: Springer, pp. 521-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_18
Tsai K.-H., Wang J.-C. (2008) External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 91-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.07.002
Tsai W. (2017) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
Un C.A., Rodríguez A. (2018) Learning from R&D outsourcing vs. learning by R&D outsourcing. Technovation, 72-73, 24-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.003
Valentini G., Di Guardo M.C. (2012) M&A and the profile of inventive activity. Strategic Organization, 10(4), 384-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012457980
Wales W.J., Parida V., Patel P.C. (2013) Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 622-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2026
Wang X., Xi Y., Xie J., Zhao Y. (2017) Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&A: the roles of routine and knowledge compatibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1580-1595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0091
Wanke P., Maredza A., Gupta R. (2017) Merger and acquisitions in South African banking: A network DEA model. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 362-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.055
Warner A.G., Fairbank J.F., Steensma H.K. (2006) Managing Uncertainty in a Formal Standards-Based Industry: A Real Options Perspective on Acquisition Timing. Journal of Management, 32(2), 279-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305280108
Zahra S.A., George G. (2002) Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Zahra S.A., Hayton J.C. (2008) The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.01.001
Zhu H., Ma X., Sauerwald S., Peng M.W. (2019) Home country institutions behind cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1315-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699520
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.