Ключевые слова
межорганизационный трансфер технологий
анализ среды функционирования
патенты
слияния и поглощения
Как цитировать
Аннотация
Трансфер технологий выступает ключевым элементом инновационного процесса. Оценить его эффективность возможно путем измерения основных детерминант, характеризующих сделки слияния и поглощения (СП). Авторы использовали анализ среды функционирования (data envelopment analysis, DEA). Данный метод учитывает как результирующие (характеристики фирмы-покупателя после слияния), так и исходные параметры (технологический потенциал объекта поглощения до слияния), обеспечивая многомерную оценку, в том числе стоимости приобретенной технологической базы.Исследование на выборке из 434 сделок СП выявило неблагоприятные последствия наращивания потенциала для компании-приобретателя за счет сторонних технологий. Чем большей интенсивностью исследований и разработок она отличалась до совершения сделки, тем ниже эффективность межорганизационного трансфера технологий. Размеры фирмы-покупателя и относительный масштаб сделки также существенно и негативно влияют на результаты СП. При этом эффект таких характеристик приобретателя, как капиталоемкость и число патентов, остается незначительным.
Литература
Ahuja G., Katila R. (2001) Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 197-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.157
Apriliyanti I.D., Alon I.I. (2017) Bibliometric analysis of absorptive capacity. International Business Review, 26(5), 896-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.007
Asquith P., Bruner R.F., Mullins D.W. (1983) The gains to bidding firms from merger. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 121-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90007-7
Balsmeier B., Fleming L., Manso G. (2017) Independent boards and innovation. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(3), 536-557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2016.12.005
Bena J., Li K. (2014) Corporate Innovations and Mergers and Acquisitions. The Journal of Finance, 69, 1923-1960. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12059
Bengoa A., Maseda A., Iturralde T., Aparicio G. (2021) A bibliometric review of the technology transfer literature. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 1514-1550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09774-5
Berchicci L. (2013) Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.017
Bettinazzi E., Zollo M. (2017) Stakeholder orientation and acquisition performance. Strategic Management Journal, 38(12), 2465-2485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2672
Boateng A., Qian W., Tianle Y. (2008) Cross-border M&As by Chinese firms: An analysis of strategic motives and performance. Thunderbird International Business Review, 50(4), 259-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.20203
Bogetoft P. (2000) DEA and activity planning under asymmetric information. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13(1), 7-48. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007812822633.
Boh W.F., Evaristo R., Ouderkirk A. (2014) Balancing breadth and depth of expertise for innovation: A 3M story. Research Policy, 43(2), 349-366. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.009
Bresman H., Birkinshaw J., Nobel R. (1999) Knowledge transfers in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 439-462. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490078
Brettel M., Greve G.I., Flatten T.C. (2011) Giving up linearity: Absorptive capacity and performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 23(2), 164-189. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23209224.
Buono A.F. (1997) Technology transfer through acquisition. Management Decision, 35(3), 194-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749710169404
Bushman R.M., Smith A.J., Zhang F. (2011) Investment cash flow sensitivities really reflect related investment decisions (SSRN Paper 842085). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.842085
Capobianco A. (2020) Start-ups, killer acquisitions, and merger control - background note, Paris: OECD.
Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chaudhari S., Batra S. (2018) Absorptive capacity and small family firm performance: Exploring the mediation processes. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1201-1216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0047
Chen J., Chen Y., Vanhaverbeke W. (2011) The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms. Technovation, 31(8), 362-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.03.002
Christofi M., Vrontis D., Thrassou A., Shams S.R. (2019) Triggering technological innovation through cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A micro-foundational perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 148-166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.026
Cloodt M., Hagedoorn J., Van Kranenburg H. (2006) Mergers and Acquisitions: Their Effect on the Innovative Performance of Companies in High-Tech Industries. Research Policy, 35, 642-654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.007
Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
Colombo M.G., Grilli L., Piva E. (2006) In Search of Complementary Assets: The Determinants of Alliance Formation of High-Tech Start-Ups. Research Policy, 35(8), 1166-1199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.002
Colombo M.G., Rabbiosi L. (2014) Technological similarity, post-acquisition R&D reorganization, and innovation performance in horizontal acquisitions. Research Policy, 43(6), 1039-1054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.013
Cooper W., Seiford L., Zhu J. (2011) Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6151-8_1
Cunningham C., Ederer F., Ma S. (2021) Killer acquisitions. Journal of Political Economy, 129(3), 649-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/712506
Danbolt J. (2004) Target company cross-border effects in acquisitions into the UK. European Financial Management, 10(1), 83-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2004.00241.x
Dang C., Li Z.F., Yang C. (2018) Measuring firm size in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 86, 159-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.09.006
Desyllas P., Hughes A. (2010) Do high technology acquirers become more innovative? Research Policy, 39(8), 1105-1121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.05.005
Du M., Boateng A. (2015) State ownership, institutional effects and value creation in cross-border mergers & acquisitions by Chinese firms. International Business Review, 24(3), 430-442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.10.002
Fama E. (1970) Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2325486
Ferrari S., Cribari-Neto F. (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31(7), 799-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0266476042000214501
Flatten T.C., Engelen A., Zahra S.A., Brettel M. (2011) A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2010.11.002
George G., Kotha R., Zheng Y. (2008) Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1448-1474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00805.x
George G., Zahra S.A., Wheatley K.K., Khan R. (2001) The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance. A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), 205-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(01)00037-2
Gu L. (2016) Product market competition, R&D investment, and stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2), 441-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.09.008
Hagedoorn J. (1993) Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganisational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371-385. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140505
Hagedoorn J., Duysters G. (2002) The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 14(1), 67-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320220125892
Hanelt A., Firk S., Hildebrandt B., Kolbe L.M. (2021) Digital M&A, digital innovation, and firm performance: An empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(1), 3-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1747365
Harford J., Li K. (2007) Decoupling CEO wealth and firm performance: The case of acquiring CEOs. The Journal of Finance, 62(2), 917-949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01227.x
Haucap J., Rasch A., Stiebale J. (2019) How mergers affect innovation: Theory and evidence. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 63, 283-325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.10.003
Henderson R., Cockburn I. (1996) Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery. The RAND Journal of Economics, 27(1), 32-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w4466
Hitt M.A., Hoskisson R.E., Ireland R.D., Harrison J.S. (1991) Effects of acquisitions on R&D inputs and outputs. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 693-706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/256412
Hurmelinna-Laukkanen P., Yang J. (2022) Distinguishing between appropriability and appropriation: A systematic review and a renewed conceptual framing. Research Policy, 51(1), 104417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104417
Hussinger K. (2010) On the importance of technological relatedness: SMEs versus large acquisition targets. Technovation, 30(1), 57-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.07.006
Jiménez-Barrionuevo M.M., García-Morales V.J., Molina L.M. (2011) Validation of an instrument to measure absorptive capacity. Technovation, 31(5-6), 190-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.12.002
King D.R., Wang G., Samimi M., Cortes A.F. (2021) A meta-analytic integration of acquisition performance prediction. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1198-1236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12636
Korhonen P., Stenfors S., Syrjänen M. (2003) Multiple objective approach as an alternative to radial projection in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 20(3), 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027351816946.
Lafuent E., Berbegal-Mirabent J. (2019) Assessing the productivity of technology transfer offices: An analysis of the relevance of aspiration performance and portfolio complexity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 778-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9604-x
Laursen K., Salter A. (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Jornal, 27(2), 131-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507
Lee S.-C., Liang H., Liu C.-Y. (2010) The effects of absorptive capacity, knowledge sourcing strategy, and alliance forms on firm performance. The Service Industries Journal, 30(14), 2421-2440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060802635551
Lichtenthaler U. (2016) Determinants of absorptive capacity: The value of technology and market orientation for external knowledge acquisition. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 31(5), 600-610. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-04-2015-0076
Lichtenthaler U., Lichtenthaler E. (2010) Technology Transfer across Organizational Boundaries: Absorptive Capacity and Desorptive Capacity. California Management Review, 53(1), 154-170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2010.53.1.154
Liu F., Dutta D.K., Park K. (2021) From external knowledge to competitive advantage: Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the mediating role of labour productivity. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 33(1), 18-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1787373
Ma C., Liu Z. (2016) Effects of M&As on innovation performance: empirical evidence from Chinese listed manufacturing enterprises. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(8), 960-972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1260104
MacKinlay C.A. (1997) Event studies in economics and finance. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 13-39. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2729691.
Maditinos D., Chatzoudes D., Tsairidis C., Theriou G. (2011) The impact of intellectual capital on firms' market value and financial performance. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 12(1), 132-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691931111097944
Maksimovic V., Phillips G., Prabhala R.N. (2011) Post-merger restructuring and the boundaries of the firm. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 317-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.013
Moeller S.B., Schlingemann F.P., Stulz R.M. (2004) Firm size and the gains from acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 73(2), 201-228. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.07.002
Motta M., Peitz M. (2021) Big Tech Mergers. Information Economics and Policy, 54, 100868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2020.100868
Ng D., Sanchez-Aragon L.F. (2022) Putting the cart (antecedents) before the horse (absorptive capacity): The role of competitive antecedents to the absorptive capacity innovation process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(9), 2306-2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2021-0518
Renneboog L., Vansteenkiste C. (2019) Failure and success in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 650-699. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2019.07.010
Rong Z., Xiao S. (2017) Innovation-related diversification and firm value. European Financial Management, 23(3), 475-518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/eufm.12110
Rossi M., Tarba S.Y., Raviv A. (2013) Mergers and acquisitions in the hightech industry: A literature review. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 21(1), 66-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/19348831311322542
Sears J., Hoetker G. (2014) Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 48-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2083
Seth A., Song K.P., Pettit R.R. (2002) Value creation and destruction in cross-border acquisitions: An empirical analysis of foreign acquisitions of US firms. Strategic Management Journal, 23(10), 921-940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.264
Shin S., Han J., Marhold K., Kang J. (2017) Reconfiguring the firm's core technological portfolio through open innovation: Focusing on technological M&A. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(3), 571-591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2016-0295
Simar L., Wilson P.W. (2000) Statistical inference in nonparametric frontier models: The state of the art. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 13, 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007864806704.
Stoneman P. (2001) The economics of technological diffusion, New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Stoneman P., Kwon M.J. (1996) Technology adoption and firm profitability. Economic Journal, 106, 952-962. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235366
Sun Y., Zhai Y. (2018) Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: A scientometric review. Scientometrics, 116, 203-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2748-0
Szücs F. (2014) M&A and R&D: Asymmetric effects on acquirers and targets? Research Policy, 43(7), 1264-1273. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.007
Tremblay V.J., Tremblay C.H. (2012) Horizontal, vertical, and conglomerate mergers. In: New perspectives on industrial organization (eds. V.J. Tremblay, C.H. Tremblay), New York: Springer, pp. 521-566. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_18
Tsai K.-H., Wang J.-C. (2008) External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(1), 91-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.07.002
Tsai W. (2017) Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/3069443
Un C.A., Rodríguez A. (2018) Learning from R&D outsourcing vs. learning by R&D outsourcing. Technovation, 72-73, 24-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.12.003
Valentini G., Di Guardo M.C. (2012) M&A and the profile of inventive activity. Strategic Organization, 10(4), 384-405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012457980
Wales W.J., Parida V., Patel P.C. (2013) Too much of a good thing? Absorptive capacity, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 622-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2026
Wang X., Xi Y., Xie J., Zhao Y. (2017) Organizational unlearning and knowledge transfer in cross-border M&A: the roles of routine and knowledge compatibility. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1580-1595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0091
Wanke P., Maredza A., Gupta R. (2017) Merger and acquisitions in South African banking: A network DEA model. Research in International Business and Finance, 41, 362-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2017.04.055
Warner A.G., Fairbank J.F., Steensma H.K. (2006) Managing Uncertainty in a Formal Standards-Based Industry: A Real Options Perspective on Acquisition Timing. Journal of Management, 32(2), 279-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305280108
Zahra S.A., George G. (2002) Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
Zahra S.A., Hayton J.C. (2008) The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(2), 195-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2007.01.001
Zhu H., Ma X., Sauerwald S., Peng M.W. (2019) Home country institutions behind cross-border acquisition performance. Journal of Management, 45(4), 1315-1342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317699520
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.