Abstract
This paper discusses the participation of the EU13 countries in European research, mainly in the European Framework Programmes for RTD. It briefly reflects on the structural challenges of the then Central European candidate countries during the transformation period in the 1990s to recall their starting-point at the time when they first became associated to the European Framework Programme for RTD. Almost 15 years after the first full association to the European Framework Programme for RTD, the actual participation situation of the ‘new’ EU member states is analysed. Next, the European Union’s measures to enhance widening participation of organizations in the ongoing European Framework Programme for RTD with the name ‘HORIZON 2020’ are concisely described. Finally, conclusions are drawn as to why – despite several efforts – participation of the EU13 is still low.
It is argued that structural deficiencies of national innovation and research systems have to be further eliminated, that smaller corrective measures like upgraded NCP systems may be necessary but not sufficient and that a sustainable enhancement of participation has to be based on increasing excellence adopted to the national and local context. The paper introduces a set of adoption actions such as awareness-raising, information and advice to access HORIZON 2020, advice and quick checks of project ideas, support for international partner search, creation of sectorial or cross-sectorial interest groups, promotion of local academia-industry cooperation and their cross-border networking, provision of training to potential EU project managers etc. Such activities are often performed by NCP systems. They can help to mobilise ‘dormant’ research communities, and perhaps upgrade a proposal from one level to the next. Nonetheless, they can neither generate excellent ideas nor write outstanding research proposals which are needed to compete successfully in HORIZON 2020. NCP systems can neither balance structural deficiencies of national innovation and research systems, nor replace forward-looking STI policy-making which requires special efforts to implement.
References
Andreff W., Eleftheriou A., Horvat M., Krickau-Richter L., Nolan T., Pilotti A.-M., Ribeiro da Silva N. (2000) 1999 Five-Year Assessment Related to the Specific Programme INCO. Brussels: European Commission.
Biegelbauer P. (2000) 130 Years of Catching Up with the West. A Comparative Perspective on Hungarian Industry, Science and Technology Policy-Making since Industrialisation. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Biegelbauer P., Griessler E., Leuthold M. (2001) The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on the Knowledge Base of Central and Eastern European Countries. Reihe Politikwissenschaft 77. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Bucar M., Stare M. (2002) Slovenian Innovation Policy: Underexploited Potential for Growth // Journal of International Relations and Development. Vol. 5. № 4. Р. 427-448.
Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science (2002) Attracting Young Scientists - Strategies against Brain Drain. Sofia: Bulgarian Ministry of Education and Science.
CORDIS (2002) Erfolgsrate Sloweniens bei RP5-Vorschlägen in den Ländern Mittel- und Osteuropas (MOEL) am höchsten // Cordis focus. № 205. Р. 10.
Coopers & Lybrand, CIRCA Group, C'EST (1999) Impact of the Enlargement of the European Union towards the Associated Central and Eastern European Countries on RTD-Innovation and Structural Policies. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Commission.
Dyker D. (1999) Foreign Direct Investment in the Former Communist World: A Key Vehicle for Technological Upgrading? // Innovation. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 345-352.
European Commission (2013) 6th FP7 Monitoring Report. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/research/evaluations/pdf/archive/fp7_monitoring_reports/6th_fp7_monitoring_report.pdf#view%3Dfit%26pagemode%3Dnone, дата обращения 19.06.2014.
European Commission (2014a) Spreading Excellence and Widening Participation. HORIZON 2020 Work Programme 2014 - 2015 Part 15 (Revised). Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/wp/2014_2015/main/h2020-wp1415-sewp_en.pdf, стр. 10, дата обращения 18.07.2014.
European Commission (2014b) HORIZON 2020: Associated Countries (version 1.4). Brussels: European Commission. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/grants_manual/hi/3cpart/h2020-hi-list-ac_en.pdf, дата обращения 18.07.2014.
Gachter A. (2001) Return to Bulgaria. Working Paper. Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.
Gaponenko N., Gokhberg L., Mindeli L. (1995) Transformation der Wissenschaft Russlands // Tranformation mittel- und osteuropaischer Wissenschaftssysteme / Eds. R. Mayntz, U. Schimank, P. Weingart. Opladen: Leske und Budrich. P. 382-569.
Havas A. (1999) A long way to go: The Hungarian science and technology policy in transition // Institutional Change and Industrial Development in Central and Eastern Europe (eds. A. Lorentzen, B. Widmaier, M. Laki), Aldershot: Ashgate. P. 221-248.
Havas A. (2002) Does innovation policy matter in a transition country? The case of Hungary // Journal of International Relations and Development. Vol. 5. № 4. Р. 357-379.
ICCR (1997) Conference Summary on the 2nd Semmering Science and Technology Forum: East-West Cooperation in Science & Technology at the Eve of the European Union's Eastern Enlargement. Semmering (Austria), November 13-14, 1997. Vienna: ICCR.
Inzelt A. (1999) Transformation role of the FDI in R&D: Analysis based on databank. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation, Lisbon, August 3-5, 1998.
Josephson P.R. (1994) The political economy of Soviet science from Lenin to Gorbachev // Scientists and the State. Domestic structures and the international context / Ed. E. Solingen. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press. P. 145-169.
Le Masne D. (2001) Report on the 2nd Parallel Session (RTD Systems) of the 8-9 March Seminar on Integration of the Candidate Countries into ERA (March 2001). Brussels: European Commission.
Loudin J., Schuch K. (2009) (eds.) Innovation Cultures - Challenge and Learning Strategy. Prague: Filosofia.
MIRRIS (2014) Scoping Paper. Participation of EU13 countries in FP7 (prepared and compiled by C. Seublens), Eurada.
Mickiewicz T., Radosevic S. (2001) Innovation capabilities of the six EU candidate countries: Comparative data based analysis (Study commissioned by the Directorate General for Enterprise - European Commission). London: University College London.
Nauwelaers C., Reid A. (2002) Learning innovation policy in a market-based context: Process, issues and challenges for EU candidate-countries // Journal of International Relations and Development. Vol. 5. № 4. Р. 357-380.
Nedeva M. (1999) When David met Goliath: Research collaboration in the context of changing political realities // Innovation. Vol. 12. № 3. P. 305-322.
OECD (1994) Science and Technology Policy. Review and Outlook 1994. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2002) Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development (6th ed.). Paris: OECD.
PROVISO (2014) 7. EU-Rahmenprogramm für Forschung, technologische Entwicklung und Demonstration (2007-2013), PROVISO Bericht, Juni 2014 (prepared and compiled by M. Ehardt-Schmiederer, J. Brücker, D. Milovanovic, V. Postl, C. Kobel, F. Hackl, L. Schleicher, A. Antúnez), Wien.
Radosevic S. (2011) Science-industry links in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States: Conventional policy wisdom facing reality // Science and Public Policy. Vol. 38. № 5. Р. 365-378.
Radosevic S. (2014) Technology Upgrading and RTD Challenges in Western Balkan Region: Issues and Policy Options. Synopsis of Keynote Presentation // R&D and Innovation in Western Balkans. Moving Towards 2020 / Eds. I. Marinkovic, E. Dall. Vienna: Centre for Social Innovation.
Reid A., Radosevic S., Nauwelaers C. (2001) Innovation policy issues in six candidate countries: The challenges. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
Reith R., Pichler R., Dirninger C. (2006) (eds.) Innovationskultur in historischer und ökonomischer Perspektive. Modelle, Indikatoren und regionale Entwicklungslinien. Innsbruck: StudienVerlag.
Schuch K. (2005) The Integration of Central Europe into the European System of Research. Wien: Guthmann-Peterson.
Schuch K., Dall E., Scheck H. (2013) MIRRIS Policy Dialogue Methodology (Deliverable 2.2, November 2013). Wien.
Suurna M., Kattel R. (2010) Europeanization of innovation policy in Central and Eastern Europe // Science and Public Policy. Vol. 37. № 9. P. 646-664.
Svarc J. (2006) Socio-political factors and the failure of innovation policy in Croatia as a country in transition // Research Policy. Vol. 35. № 1. Р. 144-159.
UNESCO (1999) Report from a meeting of ministers and senior officials responsible for science policies in Central and Eastern European Countries. Venice: UNESCO Regional Office for Science and Technology for Europe.
UNESCO (2000) European S&T policy and the EU enlargement. Report from a workshop of experts from preaccession CEEC and EUROPOLIS project group. Venice: UNESCO Regional Office for Science and Technology for Europe.
van der Lande R. (1998) Innovation in Eastern European Countries // Cohesion, competitiveness and RTDI: Their impact on regions / Ed. J. Cobbenhagen. Maastricht: Publishing House of the Town Hall. P. 66-75.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.