Keywords
sustainable finance
corporate governance
greenwashing
investment risk
standardization
financial markets
institutional theory
signaling theory
sustainability metrics
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper critically examines the methodological inconsistencies of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings and their impact on financial decision-making. While ESG scores are intended to guide investors and policymakers toward responsible business practices, discrepancies in rating methodologies raise concerns about their reliability and strategic value. Using a conceptual and theoretical framework, this paper integrates perceptions from institutional theory, signaling theory, and the sociology of valuation to explore how ESG ratings shape corporate sustainability narratives. It also draws on empirical studies to demonstrate inconsistencies in ESG scores and their consequences for financial markets.
The study identifies three primary flaws in ESG ratings: (1) Divergent methodologies lead to inconsistent scores across rating agencies; (2) Firms prioritize ESG disclosure over actual sustainability improvements, fostering greenwashing; and (3) The lack of transparency in ESG rating methodologies distorts investment signals, leading to mispricing risks and misaligned sustainability incentives. Additionally, the absence of strong social indicators within ESG frameworks may contribute to the ineffectiveness of these ratings in truly capturing corporate sustainability.
This paper does not provide primary empirical analysis but synthesizes existing literature to propose a refined understanding of ESG ratings. It highlights the need for future research on regulatory standardization, AI-driven ESG assessments, and independent verification mechanisms. The findings suggest that investors should not rely solely on ESG ratings when making financial decisions. Instead, they should combine multiple sustainability metrics and qualitative assessments to avoid misleading investment choices. A lack of ESG rating standardization risks undermining public trust in sustainable finance and corporate responsibility efforts. Furthermore, the insufficient emphasis on social indicators within ESG ratings may hinder their ability to promote genuine corporate accountability and social progress. This paper contributes to the growing critique of ESG rating methodologies by arguing that without regulatory intervention, ESG scores will continue to serve as unreliable indicators of corporate sustainability.
References
Abhayawansa S., Tyagi R. (2021) Sustainable Investing: The Black Box of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Ratings. Journal of Wealth Management, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2021.1.130
Amel-Zadeh A., Serafeim G. (2018) Why and How Investors Use ESG Information: Evidence from a Global Survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v74.n3.2
Berg F., Fabisik K., Sautner Z. (2021) Is History Repeating Itself? The (Un)predictable Past of ESG Ratings (ECGI Working Paper No. 708/2020), Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute.
Berger F., Kölbel J., Rigobon R. (2022) Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033
Bhattacharya S., Sharma D. (2019) Do environment, social and governance performance impact credit ratings? A study from India. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 35(3), 466–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoes-09-2018-0130
Birindelli G., Dell’Atti S., Iannuzzi A.P., Savioli M. (2018) Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12), 4699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su101204699
Burney S. (2020) Capital misallocation and governance erosion. In: ESG Myths and Realities: Collected Essays (ed. S. Globerman), Vancouver BC: Fraser Institute, pp. 51–57.
Callon M., Lascoumes P., Barthe Y. (2002) Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Christensen H.B., Hail L., Leuz C. (2021) Mandatory CSR and sustainability reporting: Economic analysis and literature review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176–1248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-021-09609-5
DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
Feng J., Goodell J.W., Shen D. (2022) ESG rating and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 46(PB), 102476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102476
Flammer C. (2021) Corporate green bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), pp. 499–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.01.010
Gibson R., Krueger, P., Schmidt P.S. (2021) ESG Rating Disagreement and Stock Returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2021.1963186
Gyönyörová L., Stachoň M., Stašek D. (2021) ESG ratings: Relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the S&P Global 1200. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(2), 1075–1109. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062
Hassan S. (2024) Greenwashing in ESG: Identifying and Addressing False Claims of Sustainability. Journal of Business and Strategic Management, 9(8), 90–105. https://doi.org/10.47941/jbsm.2390
He Y. (2024) The impact of ESG factors on the firm valuation. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 110(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/110/2024ed0127
Hong H., Kacperczyk M. (2009) The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
Juddoo K., Malki I., Mathew S., Sivaprasad, S. (2023) An impact investment strategy. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 61(1), 177–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-023-01149-0
Karpik L. (2010) Valuing the unique: The economics of singularities, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Keeley A.R. , Chapman A.J. , Yoshida K., Xie J., Janaki I., Shutaro T., Shunsuke M. (2022) ESG metrics and social equity: Investigating commensurability. Frontiers in Sustainability, 3, 920955. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2022.920955
Kong L., Akbar M., Poulová P. (2023) The role of environment, social, and governance performance in shaping corporate current and future value: The case of global tech leaders. Sustainability, 15(17), 13114. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151713114
Kräussl R., Oladiran T., Stefanova D. (2023) A review on ESG investing: Investors’ expectations, beliefs and perceptions. Journal of Economic Surveys, 38(2), 476–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12599
Krueger P., Sautner Z., Tang D.V., Zhong R. (2024) The Effects of Mandatory ESG Disclosure Around the World. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1795–1847. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12548
Leng A., Yang X., Jin Z., Cheng F., Zhang Z., Li J., Li Y. (2023) Research on the localized ESG rating system based on China’s national policy construction. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Human-Computer Interaction (ICHCI 2022), Guangzhou, China 12 January 2023. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2655936
Li X., Lou Y., Zhang L. (2024) Do commercial ties influence ESG ratings? Evidence from Moody’s and S&P. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1901–1940. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679x.12582
Mayer R., Ducsai A. (2023) ESG: Credibility behind the scores: The reliability and transparency of ESG ratings. Prosperitas, 10(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31570/prosp_2022_0041
McKinsey & Company (2022) Global sustainable-assets review 2022, Chicago, IL: McKinsey & Co.
Muniesa F., Millo Y., Callon M. (2007) An Introduction to Market Devices. The Sociological Review, 55(2_suppl), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2007.00727.x
Narula S., Sharma D., Singh R. (2024) ESG scores and firm performance: Evidence from emerging markets, Review of Economics, 89, 1170–1184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.08.024
OECD (2020) OECD Business and Finance Outlook 2020: Sustainable and Resilient Finance, Paris: OECD.
Pardy D. (2020) Governance erosion under stakeholder capitalism. In: ESG Myths and Realities: Collected Essays (ed. S. Globerman), Vancouver BC: Fraser Institute, pp. 75–77.
Priyanto P., Suhandi N.P.M. (2023) Unraveling the link: Relationship firm value shapes ESG ratings. Journal of Accounting and Business Education, 8(2), 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jabe.v8i2.44972
Qin J., Wang M. (2025) ESG rating disagreement and bank loan availability: Evidence from China. PLOS One, 20(1), e0317191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0317191
Raghunandan A., Rajgopal S. (2022) Do ESG funds make stakeholder-friendly investments? Review of Accounting Studies, 27, 822–863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-022-09693-1
Spence M. (1973) Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Sun X., Zhou C., Gan, Z. (2023) Green finance policy and ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Sustainability, 15(8), 6781. https://doi.org/10.3390/su150806781
Ting I.W.K., Azizan N.A., Kumar R., Sujit K.S. (2019) Corporate social performance and firm performance: Comparative study among developed and emerging market firms. Sustainability, 12(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010026
Wong W., Ahmad A., Mohamed-Arshad S., Nordin S., Adzis A. (2022) Environmental, social and governance performance: Continuous improvement matters. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 59(1), 49–69. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjes.vol59no1.3
Yılmaz Ç., Taşkın D. (2025) ESG ratings: An evaluation and discussion. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Green Finance for Sustainable Development (eds. A. Hunjra, J. Goodell), Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 347–352.
Zhang A., Zhang J. (2023) Renovation in environmental, social and governance (ESG) research: The application of machine learning. Asian Review of Accounting, 32(4), 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1108/ara-07-2023-0201
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.