Sustainable Transformation in China’s Agricultural Sector: From Traditional Narrow Patterns to Smart Dynamic Production
PDF (Русский)
PDF

Keywords

strategies
Foresight
forecasting
digitalization
technological transition
smart model of the agricultural sector
post-productivism
revitalization of rural areas
new technologies and competencies
China
agroecology

How to Cite

LeeJ. C., TinS., & GunawanJ. (2024). Sustainable Transformation in China’s Agricultural Sector: From Traditional Narrow Patterns to Smart Dynamic Production. Foresight and STI Governance, 18(3), 6-15. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2024.3.6.15

Abstract

Technological transitions and the associated transformation of key sectors are radically changing the entire socioeconomic system. The agricultural sector, as one of its key links, today is intensively saturated with new technologies and management innovations. For the first time, there is an opportunity to “do things completely differently,” to restore and develop both the natural and human potential of rural areas. This makes it possible to create smart industries with their dynamic chains, complex infrastructure, large-scale digital platforms and networks, implement the concept of sustainable development, and make a transition from productivism (exclusive focus on productivity) to post-productivism (a balance between ensuring economic interests are met and guaranteeing the healthy integrity of natural diversity). This article analyzes the current state of and prospects for China’s agricultural sector from the point of view of two levels – “top-down” (state initiatives) and “bottom-up” (inputs of product manufacturers identified during a regional Foresight project, but apparently characteristic for most Chinese rural areas). The key limiting force in the development of the concepts under consideration is the too slow process of building human capital with residents living directly in rural areas and the development of related sectors in said areas.

https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2024.3.6.15
PDF (Русский)
PDF

References

Ahmed Z., Shew A., Nalley L., Popp M., Green V.S., Brye K. (2024) An examination of thematic research, development, and trends in remote sensing applied to conservation agriculture. International Soil and Water Conservation Research, 12(1), 77-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.04.001

Braun V., Clarke V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun V., Clarke V., Hayfield N., Davey L., Jenkinson E. (2022) Doing Reflexive Thematic Analysis. In: Supporting Research in Counselling and Psychotherapy (eds. S. Bager-Charleson, A. McBeath), Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13942-0_2

Cai S., Zuo D., Yang H. (2023) Assessment of agricultural drought based on multi-source remote sensing data in a major grain producing area of Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 278, 108142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108142

Carlsen A.H., Fensholt R., Looms M.C., Gominski D., Stisen S., Jepsen M.R. (2024) Systematic review of the detection of subsurface drainage systems in agricultural fields using remote sensing systems. Agricultural Water Management, 299, 108892. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108892

Chen X., Pan H., Liu C., Jiang Z. (2018) Agricultural Remote Sensing and Data Science in China. In: Federal Data Science: Transforming Government and Agricultural Policy Using Artificial Intelligence (eds. F.A. Batarseh, R. Yang), New York: Academic Press, pp. 95-108.

Chen Y.F., Huang X.J., Wang L.J. (2018) China's rural revitalization and its evaluation from the perspective of multifunctional theory. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 39, 201-209. (In Chinese).

Cho J., Kim C., Lim K.J., Kim J., Ji B., Yeon J. (2023) Web-based agricultural infrastructure digital twin system integrated with GIS and BIM concepts. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 215, 108441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2023.108441

Chunjiang Z., Li J., Xian F. (2021) Development Strategy of Smart Agriculture for 2035 in China. Strategic Study of CAE, 23(4), 1-009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15302/J-SSCAE-2021.04.001

Duff H., Hegedus P.B., Loewen S., Bass T., Maxwell B.D. (2022) Precision agroecology (Review). Sustainability, 14(1), 106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010106

Ehlers M.F., Finger R., El Benni N., Gocht A., Sørensen C., Gusset M., Pfeifer C., Poppe K., Regan A., Rose D.C., Wolfert S., Huber R. (2022) Scenarios for European agricultural policymaking in the era of digitalization. Agricultural Systems, 196, 103318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103318

Fang Y.G., Liu J.S. (2015) Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory: Beyond modernization paradigm. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70, 257-270. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201502007

Fereday J., Adelaide N., Australia S., Eimear Muir-Cochrane A. (2006) Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107

Hennink M.M., Kaiser B.N., Marconi V.C. (2017) Code Saturation Versus Meaning Saturation: How Many Interviews Are Enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

Huang H. (2020) Learning from exploratory rural practices of the Yangtze River Delta in China: New initiatives, networks and empowerment shifts, and sustainability. Journal of Rural Studies, 77, 63-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.019

Huang J., Yang G. (2017) Understanding recent challenges and new food policy in China. Global Food Security, 12, 119-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2016.10.002

Huang Y., Chen L., Li X. (2022) Productivism and Post-Productivism: An Analysis of Functional Mixtures in Rural China. Land 2022, 11(9), 1490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091490

Husaini A.M., Sohail M. (2022) Robotics-assisted, organic agricultural-biotechnology based environment-friendly healthy food option: Beyond the binary of GM versus Organic crops. Journal of Biotechnology, 361, 41-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.11.018

Jiang B., Chen Y.Y., Zhu X.D., Cheng B. (2022) Ecosystem services research and its application in land use planning and management. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 41, 2263-2270 (in Chinese).

Kok A., Oostvogels V.J., de Olde E.M., Ripoll-Bosch R. (2020) Balancing biodiversity and agriculture: Conservation scenarios for the Dutch dairy sector. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 302, 107103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107103

Lam H.-M., Remais J., Fung M.-C., Xu L., Sun S.S.-M. (2013) Food supply and food safety issues in China. The Lancet, 381(9882), 2044-2053. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60776-x

Li Y., Jia L., Wu W., Yan J., Liu Y. (2018) Urbanization for rural sustainability - Rethinking China's urbanization strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 580-586. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.273

Lin R.Q., Cai Y.L. (2012) Study on rural multifunction and landscape reformulation in the transitional period. Human Geography, 27, 45-49 (in Chinese).

Liu C. (2014) Population ageing in Hollow Villages: A perspective from urban rural restructuring in China. Territorio, 69, 134-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3280/TR2014-069019

Liu C., Cheng L., Li J., Lu X., Xu Y., Yang Q. (2023) Trade-offs analysis of land use functions in a hilly-mountainous city of northwest Hubei province: The interactive effects of urbanization and ecological construction. Habitat International, 131, 102705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102705

Liu N. (2024) China's Smart Agriculture Boom Has Tech Potential but Requires Affordable Solutions. https://geoawesome.com/chinas-smart-agriculture-boom-has-tech-potential-but-requires-affordable-solutions/, дата обращения 05.08.2024.

Long H. (2022) Theorizing land use transitions: A human geography perspective. Habitat International, 128, 102669. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2022.102669

Ma W., Jiang G., Li W., Zhou T., Zhang R. (2019) Multifunctionality assessment of the land use system in rural residential areas: Confronting land use supply with rural sustainability demand. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 73-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.053

Mccarthy J. (2005) Rural geography: Multifunctional rural geographies - Reactionary or radical? Progress in Human Geography, 29, 773-782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132505ph584pr

Newbold T., Hudson L.N., Arnell A.P., Contu S., De Palma A., Ferrier S., Hill S.L., Hoskins A.J., Lysenko I., Phillips H.R., Burton V.J., Emerson S., Gao D., Pask-Hale G., Hutton J., Jung M., Sanchez-Ortiz K., Simmons B., Whitmee S.,Zhang H, Scharlemann J.P.W., Purvis A. (2016) Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science, 353, 288-291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2201

Onwuegbuzie A.J., Dickinson W.B., Leech N.L., Zoran A.G. (2009) A Qualitative Framework for Collecting and Analyzing Data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301

Parkin S., Kimergård A. (2022) A critical analysis of respondent quotes used as titles of qualitative research papers that are published in peer-reviewed journals. Accountability in Research, 29(2), 109-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2021.1901224

Polzin C. (2024) The role of visions in sustainability transformations: Exploring tensions between the Agrarwende vanguard vision and an established sociotechnical imaginary of agriculture in Germany. Global Environmental Change, 84, 102800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102800

Purnhagen K.P., Clemens S., Eriksson D., Fresco L.O., Tosun J., Qaim M., Visser R.G.F., Weber A.P.M., Wesseler J.H.H., Zilberman D. (2021) Europe's Farm to Fork Strategy and Its Commitment to Biotechnology and Organic Farming: Conflicting or Complementary Goals? Trends in Plant Science, 26(6), 600-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2021.03.012

Rejeb A., Abdollahi A., Rejeb K., Treiblmaier H. (2022) Drones in agriculture: A review and bibliometric analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 198, 107017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2022.107017

Sgroi F. (2022) The circular economy for resilience of the agricultural landscape and promotion of the sustainable agriculture and food systems. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 8, 100307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2022.100307

Tung R.L. (2016) Opportunities and Challenges Ahead of China's New Normal. Long Range Planning, 49(5), 201649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2016.05.001

Wang X., Raymo J. (2021) The Great Migration and the Urban-Rural Divide: Lonely Life Expectancy in China. Innovation in Aging, 5(S1), 37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igab046.139

Wang C.W., Gu H.Y. (2012) Productivism? Post-productivism? - On the changes and choices of agricultural policy concepts in New China Reform Econ. Syst., 64-68. (In Chinese).

Weber H., Sciubba J.D. (2019) The effect of population growth on the environment: Evidence from European regions. European Journal of Population, 35, 379-402. https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10680-018-9486-0.

Wiggering H., Dalchow C., Glemnitz M., Helming K., Müller K., Schultz A., Stachow U., Zander P. (2006) Indicators for multifunctional land use - Linking socio-economic requirements with landscape potentials. Ecological Indicators, 6, 238-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.08.014

Wilson G.A. (2001) From productivism to post-productivism and back again? Exploring the (un)changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, 77-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-5661.00007

Wilson G.A. (2007) Multifunctional Agriculture: A Transition Theory Perspective, Wallingford (UK): CAB International.

Wilson G.A. (2014) Community resilience: Path dependency, lock-in effects and transitional ruptures. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57, 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.741519

World Bank (2023) Four Decades of Poverty Reduction in China: Drivers, Insights for the World, and the Way Ahead, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.

Xu T., Chen H., Ji Y., Qiao D., Wang F. (2023) Understanding the differences in cultivated land protection behaviors between smallholders and professional farmers in Hainan Province, China. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 7, 1081671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2023.1081671

Xue L., Peng C., Xu D., Guo Y., Wang Q., Zheng X., Han R., You A. (2023) Agricultural land suitability analysis for an integrated rice-crayfish culture using a fuzzy AHP and GIS in central China. Ecological Indicators, 148, 109837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109837

Zang Y., Liu Y., Yang Y., Woods M., Fois F. (2020) Rural decline or restructuring? Implications for sustainability transitions in rural China. Land Use Policy, 94, 104531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104531

Zhang Y., Long H., Li Y., Tu S., Jiang T. (2020) Non-point source pollution in response to rural transformation development: A comprehensive analysis of China's traditional farming area. Journal of Rural Studies, 83, 165-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.10.010

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.