The Practice and Future of Financing Science, Technology, and Innovation
PDF (Русский)
PDF

Keywords

science, technology and innovation
funding
public-private partnerships
financial incentives
fiscal incentives
project financing

How to Cite

da FonsecaR. S. (2018). The Practice and Future of Financing Science, Technology, and Innovation. Foresight and STI Governance, 12(2), 6-22. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.6.22

Abstract

The importance of financing science, technology and innovation (STI) is growing increasingly relevant and is changing its content. New, more comprehensive financing mechanisms are emerging. With STI costs rising and government budgets shrinking, research and innovation has become more cooperative and network-based.

The paper discusses the different instruments and incentives available for governments to improve the financing of innovation. Two case studies illustrate government efforts from the United Kingdom and Brazil towards innovation financing issues. Lastly, recent and future STI financing trends are reviewed.
Governments continue to play a crucial and determining role in STI financing, whether through financial incentives, fiscal incentives or a mix of both. Countries with low national innovation performance should assign more weight to fiscal incentives, while countries with high innovation performance financial incentives prove more efficient.

https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.6.22
PDF (Русский)
PDF

References

Christofidis C., Debande O. (2001) Financing Innovative Firms through Venture Capital. Luxembourg: European Investment Bank. Режим доступа: http://www.eib.org/attachments/pj/vencap.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

EIB (n.d.) Project Finance. EPEC PPP Online Guide. Режим доступа: http://www.eib.org/epec/g2g/annex/1-project-finance/, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

ETI (2012) Delivering the UK‘s Future Energy Technologies. Annual Review 2012. Loughborough: Energy Technologies Institute. Режим доступа: http://www.all-energy.co.uk/__novadocuments/29285?v=635035415144670000, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

ETI (2016) State Aid. Loughborough (UK): Energy Technologies Institute. Режим доступа: https://d2umxnkyjne36n.cloudfront.net/documents/Summary-of-Scheme-for-GBER.pdf?mtime=20160912110613, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

ETI, Ecofin (2012) Mobilising Private Sector Finance for CCS in the UK. Loughborough: Energy Technologies Institute; London: Ecofin Research Foundation. Режим доступа: https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.eti.co.uk/legacyUploads/2014/03/Ecofin_CCS_Report1.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

European Commission (2001) Corporation Tax and Innovation: Issues at Stake and Review of European Union in the Nineties. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: http://www.cordis.lu/innovation-policy/studies/fi_study1.htm, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

European Commission (2015) RIO Country Report 2015: United Kingdom. Brussels: European Commission. Режим доступа: https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/library/rio-country-report-united-kingdom-2015, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

FNDCT (2013) Relatório de Resultados do FNDCT 2013. Rio de Janeiro: FNDCT. Режим доступа: http://www.finep.gov.br/images/a-finep/Fontes_de_Recursos/Relatorio_de_Resultados_FNDCT_2013.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

HM Treasury (2015) Private Finance Initiative and Private Finance 2 Projects: 2015 Summary Data. London: Crown.

Hodge G.A., Greve C. (2007) Public-Private Partnerships: An International Performance Review // Public Administration Review. Vol. 67. P. 545-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00736.x

Leitão S. (2010) An overview of current and future agenda of Brazilian policy in science, technology and innovation. Brasília: Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation. Режим доступа: https://www.rvo.nl/sites/default/files/2014/06/Leitao_Brazil_0.pdf, дата обращения 11.03.2018.

Murray G.C., Marriott R. (1998) Why has the investment performance of technology-specialist, European venture capital funds been so poor? // Research Policy. Vol. 27. P. 947-976.

OECD (1996) Venture Capital and Innovation. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/59/2102064.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

OECD (1997a) National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/56/2101733.pdf, дата обращения 26.02.2016.

OECD (1997b) Government Venture Capital for Technology-based Firms. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/14/7/2093654.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

OECD (1999) Managing National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: http://echo.iat.sfu.ca/library/oecd99_managing_National_IS.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

OECD (2014) Strategic Public/Private Partnerships in Science, Technology and Innovation. Paris: OECD.

Rothwell R. (1994) Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process // International Marketing Review. Vol. 11. № 1. Р. 7-31. Режим доступа: , дата обращения 26.02.2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057491

UN (2009) United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Recommendations on future financing options for enhancing the development, deployment, diffusion and transfer of technology under the Convention. Vienna: United Nations. Режим доступа: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/sb/eng/02.pdf, дата обращения 12.11.2017.

UNIDO (1996) Guidelines on Infrastructure Development through BOT Projects (BOT Guidelines UNIDO.95.6.E). Vienna: UNIDO.

World Bank (2017) Project Preparation Facility: Increase in Commitment Authority and Enhanced Scope (Chair Summary). Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.

do Canto O.A.M. (2007) Incentives to Support Innovation in the Private Sector: The Brazilian Experience. Rio de Janeiro: Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP). Режим доступа: https://publications.iadb.org/handle/11319/4628, дата обращения 11.03.2018.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.