Ключевые слова
научная политика
направленность
стратегия научно-технологического и инновационного развития
советы по национальной политике
Как цитировать
Аннотация
Нормативный поворот, произошедший в результате радикального реформирования научно-технологической и инновационной политики разных стран, вызвал широкую дискуссию вокруг дилеммы «направленность — нейтральность» в рамках стратегий развития науки, технологий и инноваций (НТИ). Однако несмотря на ряд недавних публикаций и программ научной и инновационной политики, связь между двумя указанными принципами, включая практику их применения государственными органами, остается недостаточно изученной. Восполнить этот пробел позволит репрезентативный анализ (с помощью качественных методов) деятельности двух национальных советов в сфере НТИ и их роли в разработке стратегий с фокусом на процессе выбора подхода и его ценностной ориентации. На базе собранной информации и научной литературы выявлена связь с различными вариантами политики; показано, что роль советов определяется их полномочиями и ресурсами; обозначены границы соответствующей практики и намечены направления дальнейших исследований.
Литература
Acs Z., Audretsch D., Lehmann E., Licht G. (2017) National systems of innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997-1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8
Andreoni A., Chang H. (2019) The political economy of industrial policy: Structural interdependencies, policy alignment and conflict management. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 48, 136-150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2018.10.007
Balbontín R., Roeschmann J.A., Zahler A. (2018) Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación en Chile: un análisis presupuestario, Santiago: Ministerio de Hacienda. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323317343_Ciencia_Tecnologia_e_Innovacion_en_Chile_un_analisis_presupuestario, дата обращения 15.04.2022.
Benavente J.M., Bravo C., Goya D., Zahler A. (2017) Collaboration in Clusters and Technology Consortia: The Case of Chile. In: Two to tango: Public-private collaboration for productive development policies (eds. E. Fernández-Arias, C.F. Sabel, E.H. Stein, A. Trejos), Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), pp. 189-236.
Boon W., Edler J. (2018) Demand, challenges, and innovation: Making sense of new trends in innovation policy. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 435-447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy014
Borowiecki M., Paunov C. (2018) How is research policy across the OECD organised?, Paris: OECD Publishing.
Borrás S., Edler J. (2014) Introduction: On governance, systems and change. In: The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems: Explaining Change (eds. S. Borrás, J. Edler), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1-22.
Borrás S., Edler J. (2020) The roles of the state in the governance of socio-technical systems' transformation. Research Policy, 49(5), 103971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971
Borrás S., Edquist C. (2019) Holistic Innovation Policy (1st ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Breznitz D., Ornston D., Samford S. (2018) Mission critical: The ends, means, and design of innovation agencies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 883-896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty027
Capello R., Kroll H. (2016) From theory to practice in smart specialization strategy: Emerging limits and possible future trajectories. European Planning Studies, 24(8), 1393-1406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1156058
Cevallos R.A., Merino-Moreno C. (2020) National policy councils for science, technology, and innovation: A scheme for structural definition and implementation. Science and Public Policy, 47(5), 705-718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa052
Cevallos R.A., Merino-Moreno C. (2021) Structure and Operation of the National Policy Councils for Science, Technology and Innovation: The Cases of Chile and Spain. In: Policy and Governance of Science, Technology, and Innovation (eds. G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, L.A. Orozco, J.H. Sierra-González, I. Bortagaray, J. García-Estévez), Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 259-283.
Chaminade C., Lundvall B., Haneef S. (2018) Advanced Introduction to National Innovation Systems, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Cruz-Castro L., Martínez C., Peñasco C., Sanz-Menéndez L. (2020) The classification of public research organizations: Taxonomical explorations. Research Evaluation, 29(4), 377-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvaa013
Daimer S., Hufnagl M., Warnke P. (2012) Challenge-oriented policy-making and innovation systems theory. In: Innovation System Revisited: Experiences from 40 Years of Fraunhofer ISI Research, Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer Verlag, pp. 217-234. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281257959_Challenge-oriented_policy-making_and_innovation_systems_theory, дата обращения 15.04.2022.
Dutrenit G., Natera J.M., Puchet M., Torres A., Vera-Cruz A.O. (2017) Dimensiones y atributos relevantes de los procesos de diálogo entre comunidades para el diseño de políticas públicas de CTI. In: Procesos de diálogo para la formulación de políticas de CTI en América Latina y España (eds. G. Dutrénit, J.M. Natera), Buenos-Aires: LALICS, CYTED, CLASCO, pp. 37-72.
Díez-Bueso L. (2013) La gobernanza del sistema español de ciencia, tecnología e innovación. Revista de Bioética y Derecho, 28, 20-32 (in Spanish).
Edler J., Fagerberg J. (2017) Innovation Policy: What, Why, and How. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grx001
Edquist C. (2005) Systems of Innovation, Perspectives and Challenges (eds. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson), In: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 181-208.
Edquist C. (2018) Towards a holistic innovation policy: Can the Swedish National Innovation Council (NIC) be a role model? Research Policy, 48(4), 869-879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.008
Eisenhardt K.M., Graebner M.E. (2007) Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.24160888
European Commission (2018) Artificial Intelligence for Europe, Brussels: European Commission.
Fagerberg J. (2017) Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(2), 497-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12164
Fagerberg J., Hutschenreiter G. (2020) Coping with Societal Challenges: Lessons for Innovation Policy Governance. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 20(2), 279-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-019-00332-1
Fernandez-Arias E., Stein E. (2014) Un tema tabú: La selección de sectores prioritarios para la transformación productiva. In: Cómo repensar el desarrollo productivo?: Políticas e instituciones sólidas para la transformación económica (eds. G. Crespi, E. Fernandez-Arias, E. Stein), Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB).
Flanagan K., Uyarra E. (2016) Four dangers in innovation policy studies - and how to avoid them. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 177-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146126
Flink T., Kaldewey D. (2018) The new production of legitimacy: STI policy discourses beyond the contract metaphor. Research Policy, 47(1), 14-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008
Foxley A., Saez R.E., Valenzuela A. (2015) Outcome Report on the First Meeting of the Global Forum of National Advisory Councils on Science, Technology and Innovation, Santiago: Ministerio de Ciencia. https://ctci.minciencia.gob.cl/2017/07/26/outcome-report-on-the-first-meeting-of-the-global-forum-of-national-advisory-councils-on-science-technology-and-innovation/, дата обращения 15.04.2022.
Guridi J.A., Pertuze J.A., Pfotenhauer S.M. (2020) Natural laboratories as policy instruments for technological learning and institutional capacity building: The case of Chile's astronomy cluster. Research Policy, 49(2), 103899. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103899
Irwin A., Vedel J.B., Vikkelsø S. (2021) Isomorphic difference: Familiarity and distinctiveness in national research and innovation policies. Research Policy, 50(4), 104220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104220
Kuhlmann S., Rip A. (2018) Next-Generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges. Science and Public Policy, 45(4), 448-454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy011
Laranja M., Uyarra E., Flanagan K. (2008) Policies for science, technology and innovation: Translating rationales into regional policies in a multi-level setting. Research Policy, 37(5), 823-835. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.03.006
Lepori B., Reale E. (2019) The changing governance of research systems. Agencification and organizational differentiation in research funding organizations. In: Handbook on Science and Public Policy (eds. D. Simon, S. Kuhlmann, J. Stamm, W. Canzler), Norhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 448-465.
Lindner R., Daimer S., Beckert B., Heyen N., Koehler J., Teufel B., Warnke P., Wydra S. (2016) Addressing directionality: Orientation failure and the systems of innovation heuristic. Towards reflexive governance (Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Paper 52), Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
Lundvall B., Borrás S. (2005) Science, Technology and Innovation Policy. In: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (eds. J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, R. Nelson), New York: Oxford University Press.
Magro E., Navarro M., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia J.M. (2014) Coordination-Mix: The Hidden Face of STI Policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5), 367-389. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12090
Martin B.R. (2012) The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41(7), pp. 1219-1239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.012
Martin B.R. (2016) Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 432-450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv077
Mazzucato M. (2015) The Entrepreneurial State (Revised ed.), London: Anthem Press.
Mazzucato M. (2018) Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
OECD (2009) Chile's National Innovation Council for Competitiveness, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2014) OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2014, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2018) OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018, Paris: OECD.
Pelkonen A. (2006) The problem of integrated innovation policy: Analyzing the governing role of the Science and Technology Policy Council of Finland. Science and Public Policy, 33(9), 669-680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154306781778623
Porter M.E. (1998) Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.
Schot J., Steinmueller W.E. (2018) Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy, 47(9), 1554-1567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.011
Schwaag-Serger S., Wise E., Arnold E. (2015) National research and innovation councils as an instrument of innovation governance, Stockholm: VINNOVA. https://www.vinnova.se/contentassets/4da13cc174a448d1a3f0b816c6b74366/va_15_07t.pdf, дата обращения 15.04.2022.
Seawright J., Gerring J. (2008) Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), pp. 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1065912907313077.
Stilgoe J., Owen R., Macnaghten P. (2013) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568-1580. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
Weber K.M., Rohracher H. (2012) Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change. Research Policy, 41(6), 1037-1047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
Wilson J., Wise E., Smith M. (2022) Evidencing the benefits of cluster policies: Towards a generalised framework of effects. Policy Sciences, 55(2), 369-391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09460-8
Yin R.K. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.