Аннотация
Помимо инструментов «работы с будущим» (прогнозирование, сценарное планирование и т. п.) при разработке долгосрочных стратегий перехода на новую экономическую модель во многих странах применяется подход «взгляд в прошлое». Ретроспективная оценка достижений и провалов (policy learning, политический анализ, ПА) помогает извлечь уроки и повысить эффективность инновационной политики.
В статье на примере Ирана изучается использование ПА для оценки ключевых инициатив в сфере науки, технологий и инноваций на протяжении двух последних десятилетий. Полевые исследования позволили выделить основные цели политики, проанализировать их эволюцию и изменение восприятия принятых решений самими политиками. Активное применение технического и концептуального ПА свидетельствует об относительном прогрессе в корректировке вектора политики. Вместе с тем остается распространенным конъюнктурный анализ, призванный сохранить легитимность действующего курса, что указывает на недостаточную зрелость политической системы в Иране, как и во многих других развивающихся странах. Делается вывод, что для достижения реальных сдвигов и повышения эффективности инновационной политики следует использовать технический, концептуальный и социальный ПА, а конъюнктурный — свести к минимуму.
Литература
Albert N., Link N., Vonortas N. (2013) Handbook on the Theory and Practice of Program valuation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
Argote L. (2012) Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media Pub.
Baldwin G.B. (1967) Planning and development in Iran, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Bennett C.J., Howlett M. (1992) The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275-294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138786
Biegelbauer P. (2016) How different forms of policy learning influence each other: Case studies from Austrian innovation policy-making. Policy Studies, 37(2), 129-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1118027
Boekholt P. (2010) The Evolution of Innovation Paradigms and their Influence on Research, Technological Development and Innovation Policy Instruments. In: The Theory and Practice of Innovation Policy (eds. R.E. Smits, S. Kuhlmann, P. Shapira), Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub., pp. 333-362.
Bostock F., Jones G. (2014) Planning and Power in Iran: Ebtehaj and Economic Development Under the Shah, London: Routledge Pub.
Braun D., Benninghoff M. (2003) Policy learning in Swiss research policy - The case of the National Centres of Competence in Research. Research Policy, 32(10), 1849-1863. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00063-5
Casady C.B., Parra J.D. (2020) Structural Impediments to Policy Learning: Lessons from Colombia's Road Concession Programs. International Journal of Public Administration, 44(5), 359-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2020.1724142
Damuri Y., Aswicahyono H., Christian D. (2018) Innovation Policy in Indonesia. In: Innovation Policy in ASEAN (ed. M. Ambashi), Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, pp. 96-127. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/5.ERIA_Innovation_Policy_ASEAN_Chapter_4.pdf, дата обращения 18.06.2021.
Dawkins J., Colebatch H.K. (2006) Governing through Institutionalized Networks: The Governance of Sydney Harbour. Land Use Policy, 23 (3), 333-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.09.006
Dutta S., Lanvin B., Wunsch-Vincent S. (2020) The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation?, Ithaca, Fontainebleau, Geneva: WIPO. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2020.pdf, дата обращения 15.07.2021.
Fartash K., Elyasi M., Ghorbani A., Sadabadi A.A. (2021) Innovation Policy Learning in Iran's Development Plans. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(3), 81-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2021.3.81.92
Fartash K., Khayatian M., Ghorbani A., Sadabadi A. (2021) Interpretive Structural Analysis of Interrelationships of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Iran. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 16(1), 155-163. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.160116
Freeman C. (1987) Technology policy and economic policy: Lessons from Japan, London: Frances Pinter.
Gaillard J. (2010) Science and Technology in Lebanon: A University-driven Activity. Science, Technology and Society, 15(2), 271-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177%2F097172181001500205.
Hall P.A. (1993) Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25 (3), 275-296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
Heclo H. (1974) Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden, New Haven CT: Yale University Press.
Heshmati A., Dibaji S.M. (2019) Science, Technology, and Innovation Status in Iran: Main Challenges. Science, Technology and Society, 24(3), 545-578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721819873192
Kim L. (1997) Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea's technological learning, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Klochikhin E.A. (2013) Innovation system in transition: Opportunities for policy learning between China and Russia. Science and Public Policy, 40 (5), 657-673. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct021
Lee K. (2005) Making a Technological Catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2), 97-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2005.9668610
Lieu J. (2013) Influences of policy learning, transfer, and post transfer learning in the development of China's wind power policies, Brighton: University of Sussex.
Lim H. (2018) Innovation Policy in Singapore. In: Innovation Policy in ASEAN (ed. M. Ambashi), Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, pp. 198-217. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/8.ERIA_Innovation_Policy_ASEAN_Chapter_7.pdf, дата обращения 12.06.2021.
May P.J. (1992) Policy Learning and Failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12 (4), 331-354. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00005602
Mazzucato M. (2021) Mission Economy: A Moonshot Guide to Changing Capitalism, Dutton: Penguin Pub.
McCann E., Ward K. (2012) Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325-332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00276.x
McLeod T.H. (1964) National Planning in Iran: A report based on the experiences of the Harvard Advisory Group in Iran, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Advisory Group.
Moyson S., Scholten P., Weible C.M. (2017) Policy learning and policy change: Theorizing their relations from different perspectives. Policy and Society, 36(2), 161-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2017.1331879
Murrall-Smith S. (2011) Policy learning and the development of renewable energy policy in the United Kingdom, Plymouth: University of Plymouth.
Narayanan H., Yew-Wah L. (2018) Innovation Policy in Malaysia. In: Innovation Policy in ASEAN (ed. M. Ambashi), Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, pp. 128-162. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/6.ERIA_Innovation_Policy_ASEAN_Chapter_5.pdf, дата обращения 04.11.2020.
Nelson R.R., Winter S.G. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Oladeji S.I., Adegboye A.A. (2019) Science and Technology Policy for Nigeria's Development Planning. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 32(4), 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/jesbs/2019/v32i430182
Oliver M.P., Pemberton H. (2004) Learning and change in 20th century British economic policy. Governance, 17, 415-441. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00252.x
Penrose E.T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quimba F.M., Albert J.R., Llanto G.M. (2018) Innovation Policy in Philippines. In: Innovation Policy in ASEAN (ed. M. Ambashi), Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, pp. 163-197. https://www.eria.org/uploads/media/7.ERIA_Innovation_Policy_ASEAN_Chapter_6.pdf, дата обращения 17.03.2021.
Rietig K., Perkins R. (2017) Does learning matter for policy outcomes? The case of integrating climate finance into the EU budget. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(4), 487-505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1270345
Sabatier P.A. (1988) An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein. Policy Sciences, 21: 129-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00136406
Salisu Y., Bakar L. (2019) Technological capability, relational capability and firms' performance the role of learning capability. Revista de Gestao, 27(1), 79-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-03-2019-0040
Sanderson I. (2002). Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making, Public Administration, 80(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
Schoemaker P.J.H. (2020) How historical analysis can enrich scenario planning. Futures and Foresight Science, 2(3-4), e35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.35
Schwerin J., Werker C. (2003) Learning innovation policy based on historical experience. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(4), 385-404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(03)00031-6
Sharabaroff A., Stuggins G., Semikolenova Y. (2013) Energy Efficiency: Lessons Learned from Success Stories, Washington: World Bank Publications.
Siyanbola W., Adeyeye A., Olaopa O., Hassan O. (2016) Science, technology and innovation indicators in policy-making: The Nigerian experience. Palgrave Communications, 2, 16015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palcomms.2016.15
Smits R., Kuhlmann S. (2004) The rise of systemic instruments in innovation policy. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1-2), 4-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004621
Soofi A., Ghazinoory S. (2013) Science and Innovations in Iran: Development, Progress, and Challenges, London: Palgrave Macmillan Pub.
Souzanchi K.E. (2020) Linking institutions and technical changes in a developing context: Historical evidence from Iran. Innovation and Development, 10(3), 347-371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2019.1647614
Suurs R., Hekkert M., Kieboom S., Smits R. (2010) Understanding the formative stage of technological innovation system development: The case of natural gas as an automotive fuel. Energy Policy, 38, 419-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.09.032
UNCTAD (2015) Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review of Thailand, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2015d1_en.pdf, дата обращения 16.07.2021.
UNCTAD (2016) Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict20163_en.pdf, дата обращения 16.07.2021.
UNESCO (2008) Science, Technology & Innovation Policy for Lebanon: Comprehensive Document, Paris: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/SC/pdf/sc_sti_lebanon_en.pdf, дата обращения 12.02.2021.
Yin R.K. (2013) Case study research: Design and methods, California: Sage Pub.
Yongabo P., Goransson B. (2020) Constructing the national innovation system in Rwanda: Efforts and challenges. Innovation and Development,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2020.1846886

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.