Ключевые слова
портфель технологических ИиР
управление технологиями
промышленное финансирование
матрица портфеля направлений исследований
Как цитировать
Аннотация
Университеты играют все более важную роль в современном обществе, расширяя границы науки и трансформируя экономику регионов. По мере изменения моделей их финансирования университеты перенимают некоторые аспекты организации работы предприятий. Поскольку способность университетов привлекать финансирование, особенно из частных источников (промышленность) становится жизненно важной, на первое место выходит соотношение фундаментальных и прикладных исследований. В статье проанализирован пятилетний опыт Сколковского института науки и технологий (Сколтех), в частности его научно-исследовательский портфель. В основе анализа лежит теория и практика использования «матрицы портфеля направлений исследований» (Research Domain Portfolio Matrix, RDPM), которая рассматривает университет, как портфель технологических ИиР по различным направлениям, находящихся на разных этапах технологической зрелости. Для университетов крайне важно найти адекватный баланс фундаментальных и прикладных исследованиями при принятии решений о запуске новых или корректировке существующих проектов/программ. Предлагаемый подход RDPM поможет эффективно использовать ограниченные ресурсы, определить приоритеты, отслеживать риски и контролировать результаты в кратко- и долгосрочной перспективе.
Литература
Achi Z., Doman A., Sibony O., Sinha J., Witt S. (1995) The paradox of fast growth tigers. The McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 4-17.
Altbach P.G., Knight J. (2007) The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11 (3-4), 290-305. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1028315307303542.
Arman H. (2019) A Practical Strategic Planning Approach for R&D Organisations. In: R&D Management in the Knowledge Era. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management (eds. T. Daim, M. Dabić, N. Başoğlu, J. Lavoie, B. Galli), Cham: Springer, pp. 145-159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15409-7_5
Auranen O., Nieminen M. (2010) University research funding and publication performance - An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822-834. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
Bentley P., Gulbrandsen M., Kyvik S. (2015) The relationship between basic and applied research in universities. Higher Education, 70(4), 689-709. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9861-2
Burgher J., Hamers H. (2020) A quantitative optimization framework for market-driven academic program portfolios. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2018-0099
Cooper R.G., Edgett S.J., Kleinschmidt E.J. (1998) Best practices for managing R&D portfolios. Research Technology Management, 41(4), 20-33. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24131706.
Crawley E., Hegarty J., Edström K., Garcia Sanchez J.C. (2020) Universities as Engines of Economic Development, Cham: Springer.
Dolence M.G., Norris D.M. (1994) Using Key Performance Indicators to Drive Strategic Decision Making. New Directions for Institutional Research, 82, 63-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i04.10547
Drucker P. (1997) Seeing things as they really are (Interview with R. Lenzner & S.S. Johnson). Forbes, 03.10.1997. http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1997/0310/5905122a.html.
EIU (2020) New Schools of Thought. Innovative Models for Delivering Higher Education, London, New York, Hong Kong: Economist Intelligence Unit.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000) The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and ‘‘Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Geuna A., Martin B.R. (2003) University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bd.
Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. (1994) The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies, London: Sage.
Goldstein H., Renault C. (2004) Contributions of universities to regional economic development: A quasi-experimental approach. Regional Studies, 38(7), 733-746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000265232
Grover R. (2019) The Relationship between Science and Technology and Evolution in Methods of Knowledge Production. Indian Journal of History of Science, 54(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.16943/ijhs/2019/v54i1/49597
Gulbrandsen M., Smeby J.-C. (2005) Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.05.004
Hemsley-Brown J., Oplatka I. (2010) Market orientation in universities. The International Journal of Educational Management, 24(3), 204-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541011031565
Irvine J., Martin B.R., Isard P.A. (1990) Investing in the Future, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Katalevsky D.Y. (2007) Management of organization growth based on a system-dynamic approach. Moscow University Bulletin, Series 21, 4, 64-79 (in Russian).
Kotler P., Fox K.F. (1985) Strategic Marketing for Educational Institutions, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Labib A., Read M., Gladstone-Millar C., Tonge R., Smith D. (2014) Formulation of higher education institutional strategy using operational research approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 885- 904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.754868
Lundvall B-Å. (1988) Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation. In: Technical Change and Economic Theory (eds. G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, L. Soete), London, New York: Pinter, pp. 61-83.
Lyken-Segosebe D., Shepherd J.C. (2013) Higher Education Leadership and Policy Studies Peabody College Of Education and Human Development, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
Mangram M.E. (2013) A simplified perspective of the Markowitz portfolio theory. Global Journal of Business Research, 7(1), 59-70.
Manyika J., McRaven W.H., Segal A. (2019) Innovation and National Security: Keeping Our Edge, New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
McDonald R.E. (2007) An Investigation of Innovation in Nonprofit Organizations: The Role of Organizational Mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 256-281. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0899764006295996.
Mervis J. (2017) Data Check: U.S. Government Share of Basic Research Funding Falls Below 50%. Science, March 9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal0890
Mohrman K., Ma W., Baker D. (2008) The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.hep.8300175
Nelson R.R. (1993) National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD (2002) Frascati Manual Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, Paris: OECD.
Roberts E.B., Murray F., Kim J.D. (2019) Entrepreneurship and Innovation at MIT: Continuing Global Growth and Impact - An Updated Report. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000093
Rücker Schaeffer P., Fischer B., Queiroz S. (2018) Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems. Foresight and STI Governance, 12(2), 50-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2018.2.50.61
Schubert T., Kroll H. (2016) Universities' effects on regional GDP and unemployment: The case of Germany. Papers in Regional Science, 95(3), 467-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12150
Seers A. (2007) Management education in the emerging knowledge economy: Going beyond those who can, do; those who can't, teach. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(4), 558-567. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2007.27694955
Selingo J. (2013) College (Un)Bound: The Future of Higher Education and What It Means for Students, Las Vegas, NV: Amazon Publishing.
Slaughter S., Leslie L.L. (1997) Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Tijssen R.J.W., Winnink J. (2016) Twenty-first century macro-trends in the institutional fabric of science: bibliometric monitoring and analysis. Scientometrics, 109, 2181-2194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2041-z
Wells R., Wells C. (2011) Academic program portfolio model for universities: Guiding strategic decisions and resource allocations. Research in Higher Education Journal, 11(1). https://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/11745.pdf, accessed 18.01.2021.
Xu G., Wu Y., Minshall T., Zhou Y. (2018) Exploring innovation ecosystems across science, technology, and business: A case of 3D printing in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 208-221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.030
Yip G.S. (1981) Market Selection and Direction: Role of Product Portfolio Planning, Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.