Ключевые слова
«зеленый» менеджмент
цепочка поставок
«тройная спираль»
продуктивность
университет
вовлечение
координация
Как цитировать
Аннотация
В статье высказано предположение, что для устойчивого повышения эффективности производства в контексте задач устойчивого развития экологические стратегии следует разрабатывать на уровне цепочек поставок, а не отдельных организаций. Прослежено сходство позиций, изложенных в экологических декларациях частных компаний и государственных организаций; по мнению авторов, интенсивное взаимодействие с первыми дает последним мощные рычаги стимулирования и поддержки реализации экологических инициатив в масштабах цепочек поставок.На базе теории «тройной спирали» (Triple Helix Theory) авторы анализируют важность объединения усилий государства, промышленности и науки для формирования и операционализации инновационного мышления. В статье рассматриваются роли организаций государственного и частного секторов и университетов в разработке экологических стратегий и практическом функционировании цепочек поставок. Анализируются системы экологического менеджмента (Environmental Management Systems, EMS), а в качестве потенциального механизма структурирования и формирования отчетности о результатах совместной работы по оптимизации цепочек поставок в их экологическом измерении предложена единая схема экологического менеджмента и аудита (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme, EMAS).Литература
Angeles R., Nath R. (2007) Business-to-business e-procurement: Success factors and challenges to implementation // Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. Vol. 12. № 2. P. 104-115.
Beukers M., Versendaal J., Batenburg R., Brinkkemper S. (2006) The procurement alignment framework construction and application // Wirtschaftsinformatik. Vol. 48. № 5. P. 323-330.
Biemans W.M., Brand M.J. (1995) Reverse marketing: A synergy of purchasing and relationship marketing // International Journal of Purchasing & Materials Management. Vol. 31. № 3. P. 29-37.
Blowfield M.E. (2005) Going global: How to identify and manage societal expectations in supply chains (and the consequences of failure) // Corporate Governance. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 119-128.
Brosze T. (2010) Future Global Supply Chain Logistics: Coming Back Closer to Home as a Consequence of Rising Energy Cost? Paper presented at the EARTO Annual Conference, Gothenburg, 20th May 2010, Fir Rwth Aachen. Режим доступа: http://www.earto.eu/fileadmin/content/01_Seminars___Conferences/AC_2010/2-Tobias-Brosze.pdf, дата обращения 04.12.2012.
Butner K. (2010) The smarter supply chain of the future // Strategy and Leadership. Vol. 38. № 1. P. 22-31.
Caddick J., Dale B. (1987) The Determination of Purchasing Objectives and Strategies: Some Key Influences // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Materials Management. Vol. 17. № 3. P. 5-16.
Carr A., Smeltzer L. (1999) The relationship of strategic purchasing to supply chain management // European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Chain Management. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 43-51.
Carter J.R., Narasimhan R. (1996) Is purchasing really strategic? // International Journal of Supply Chain Management. Vol. 32. № 1. P. 20-28.
Cavinato J. (1999) A general methodology for determining a fit between supply chain logistics and five stages of strategic management // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 29. № 3. P. 162-180.
Chan H.K., Wang X., White G.R.T., Yip N. (2013) An Extended Fuzzy-AHP Approach for the Evaluation of Green Product Designs // IEE Transactions on Engineering Management. Vol. 60. № 2. P. 327-339.
Chemical Week (1997) Leads on EMAS Sites // Chemical Week. Vol. 159. № 37. P. 8.
Chemical Week (1998) EU Prepares EMAS Overhaul // Chemical Week. Vol. 160. № 23. P. 6.
Childerhouse P., Towill D. (2000) Engineering supply chains to match customer requirements // Logistics Information Management. Vol. 13. № 6. P. 337-346.
Christopher M., Peck H., Towill D. (2006) A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies // The International Journal of Logistics Management. Vol. 17. № 2. P. 277-287.
Clark D. (2004) The Rough Guide to Ethical Shopping. London: Penguin.
Cousins P., Lawson B., Squire B. (2006) An empirical taxonomy of purchasing functions // International Journal of Operations & Production Management. Vol. 26. № 7. P. 775-794.
DEFRA (2011) Attitudes and Knowledge Relating to Biodiversity and the Natural Environment 2007-2011. London: Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs.
Deasy M., White G.R.T., Parfitt S., Ringwald K. (2014) Asymmetric Procurement in the Public Sector // Strategic Change. Vol. 23. № 1-2. P. 21-29.
EMAS (2006) EMAS in figures (EMAS Newsletter 2006). Режим доступа: http://www.iema.net/stream.php/download/readingroom/article/EMAS%20Newsletters/EMAS%20Newsletter%202006%20issue%204%20EMAS%20in%20Education.pdf, дата обращения 07.07.2009.
Etzkowitz H. (2002) Incubation of Incubators: Innovation as a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Networks // Science & Public Policy. Vol. 29. № 2. P. 115-128.
Etzkowitz H. (2003) Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government relation // Social Science Information. Vol. 42. № 3. P. 293-338.
Etzkowitz H. (2008) Triple Helix Innovation: Industry, University and Government in Action. London; New York: Routledge.
Etzkowitz H., Klofsten M. (2005) The innovating region: Toward a theory of knowledge-based regional development // R&D Management. Vol. 35. № 3. P. 243-255.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1995) The Triple Helix: University-industry-government relations. A laboratory for knowledge based economic development // EASST Review. European Society for the Study of Science & Technology. Vol. 14. № 1. P. 18-36.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1997) Universities in the Global Knowledge Economy: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. London: Cassell Academic.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1999) The future location of research and technology transfer // Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 24. № 2-3. P. 111-123.
Etzkowitz H., Webster A., Gebhardt C., Cantisano Terra B.R. (2000) The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm // Research Policy. Vol. 29. P. 313-330.
Feller I. (1990) Universities as engines of R&D-based growth: They think they can // Research Policy. Vol. 19. P. 335-348.
Finkbeiner M., Wiedmann M., Saur K. (1998) A comprehensive approach towards product and organisation related environmental management tools // The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. Vol. 3. № 3. P. 169-178.
Gelderman R., van Weele A. (2005) Purchasing Portfolio Models: A critique and update // Journal of Supply Chain Management. Vol. 41. № 3. P. 19-28.
Hameri A.P., Hintsa J. (2009) Assessing the drivers of change for cross-border supply chains // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 39. № 9. P. 741-761.
Harris I., Naim M., Palmer A., Potter A., Mumford C. (2011) Assessing the Impact of Cost Optimization Based on Infrastructure Modelling on CO2 Emissions // International Journal of Production Economics. Vol. 131. № 1. P. 313-321.
Hervani A., Helms M., Sarkis J. (2005) Performance measurement for green supply chain management // Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 12. № 4. P. 330-353.
Hillary R. (2004) Environmental management systems and the smaller enterprise // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 12. P. 561-569.
Hoctor K., Keating I. (2009) Back to Business Local Solutions. London: British Chambers of Commerce, Local Government Association.
Hong-Minh S.M., Disney S.M., Naim M.M. (2000) The dynamics of emergency transhipment supply chains // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 30. № 9. P. 788-816.
Honkasalo A. (1998) The EMAS Scheme: A management tool and instrument of environmental policy // Journal of Cleaner Production. Vol. 6. P. 119-128.
IEMA (2009) IEMA Acorn Scheme. Режим доступа: http://www.iema.net/ems/acorn_scheme, дата обращения 07.07.2009.
IEMA (2011) The EMAS Regulation. Режим доступа: http://www.iema.net/ems/emas/regulation, дата обращения 15.09.2011.
Inzelt A. (2004) The evolution of university - industry - government relationships during transition // Research Policy. Vol. 33. P. 975-995.
Jain V., Benyoucef L. (2008) Managing long supply chain networks: Some emerging issues and challenges // Journal of Manufacturing Technology Mangement. Vol. 19. № 4. P. 469-496.
KPMG (2010) The Public Sector Austerity Agenda - What will it mean for suppliers? Режим доступа: http://www.kpmg.co.uk/email/Restructuring/165160/Story02.html, дата обращения 03.07.2012.
Klaver J., Jonker J. (1998) The significance of recent EMS standards as an impetus for improvement // Eco-Management & Auditing. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 1-5.
Lee A. (1997) Working together? Academic literacies, co-production and professional partnerships // Literacy and Numeracy Studies. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 65-82.
Linna P., Pekkola S., Ukko J., Melkas H. (2010) Defining and measuring productivity in the public sector: Managerial perceptions // International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 23. № 3. P. 300-320.
Manuj I., Mentzer J.T. (2008) Global supply chain risk management strategies // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 38. № 3. P. 192-223.
Markley M.J., Davis L. (2007) Exploring future competitive advantage through sustainable supply chains // International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. Vol. 37. № 9. P. 763-774.
Martin M. (ed.) (2000) The Management of University-Industry Relations: Five Institutional Case Studies from Africa, Europe, Latin America and the Pacific Region. Paris: UNESCO.
Matthews D. (2005) Strategic procurement in the public sector: A mask for financial and administrative policy // Journal of Public Procurement. Vol. 5. № 3. P. 388-389.
McCue C.P., Gianakis G.A. (2001) Public Purchasing: Who's minding the store? // Journal of Public Procurement. Vol. 1. № 1. P. 71-95.
McIvor R., Humphreys P., McAleer E. (1997) The Evolution of the purchasing function // Journal of Strategic Change. Vol. 6. P. 165-179.
Murray G. (2001) Improving purchasing contribution - The purchasing strategy of buying council // International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 14. № 5. P. 391-410.
Nieminen M., Kaukonen E. (2001) Universities and R&D Networking in a Knowledge-Based Economy. Helsinki: Sitra.
Palomares-Soler M., Thimme P.M. (1996) EMAS and ISO 14001 compared // European Environmental Law Review. Vol. 5. № 8-9. P. 247-251.
Pane Haden S.S., Oyler J.D., Humphreys J.H. (2009) Historical, practical and theoretical perspectives on green management // Management Decision. Vol. 47. № 7. P. 1041-1055.
Paulraj A., Chen I., Flynn J. (2006) Levels of Strategic Purchasing: Impact on supply integration and performance // Journal of Purchasing and Supply Chain Management. Vol. 12. P. 107-122.
Piercy N.F, Cravens D.W., Lane N. (2010) Thinking strategically about pricing decisions // Journal of Business Strategy. Vol. 31. № 5. P. 38-48.
Plant E., Yusen X., White G.R.T. (2015) Green Supply Chain Management in Chinese Electronic Manufacturing Organisations: An analysis of senior managements' perceptions // International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 21-30.
Quayle M. (1998) The impact of strategic procurement in the UK Government sector // International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 11. № 5. P. 397-413.
Quayle M., Quayle S. (2000) The Impact of Strategic Procurement in the UK further and higher education sectors // The International Journal of Public Sector Management. Vol. 13. № 3. P. 260-284.
Ranga M., Etzkowitz H. (2010) Creative reconstruction - Towards a triple helix innovation strategy in Central and Eastern Europe Countries // Theory and Practice of Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries: Issues and Challenges / Eds. M. Saad, G. Zawdie. London: Routledge. P. 249-282.
Razak A.A., Saad M. (2007) The role of universities in the evolution of the Triple Helix culture of innovation network: The case of Malaysia // International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 211-225.
Razak A.A., White G.R.T. (2015) The Triple Helix Model for Innovation: A holistic exploration of barriers and enablers // International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling. Vol. 7. № 3. P. 278-291.
Reck R., Long B. (1998) Purchasing: A Competitive Weapon // Journal of Purchasing and Material Management. Vol. 24. № 3. P. 2-8.
Rink D., Fox H. (1999) Strategic procurement planning across the products sales cycle: A conceptualisation // Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 28-42.
Roberts M. (1995a) Akzo Nobel, Ciba first for EMAS // Chemical Week. Vol. 157. № 9. P. 41.
Roberts M. (1995b) Transatlantic sparks over EMAS, ISO 14001 // Chemical Week. Vol. 157. № 5. P. 14.
Roberts M. (1996) National guidelines cover part of EMAS // Chemical Week. Vol. 158. № 7. P. 15.
Ruzicka P. (2004) The EMAS scheme in the Czech Republic // Czech Industry. № 11. P. 1.
Schapper P., Matla J.N., Gilbert D. (2006) An analytical framework for the management and reform of public procurement // Journal of Public Procurement. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 1-26.
Schartinger D., Schibany A., Gassler H. (2001) Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria // The Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 26. № 3. P. 255-268.
Shi. Y., Gregory. M., Naylor. M. (1997) International manufacturing configuration map: A self assessment tool of international manufacturing capabilities // Integrated Manufacturing Systems. Vol. 8. P. 273-282.
Staples W., Dalrymple J. (2011) Exploring Infrastructure Procurement by Australian State Governments // International Journal of Managing Projects in Business. Vol. 4. № 3. P. 512-523.
Strachan P., Haque M., McCulloch A. (1997) The Eco-Management and Audit Scheme: Recent experiences of UK participating organizations // European Environment. № 7. P. 25-33.
UN (1987) Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Vienna: United Nations. Режим доступа: http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm, дата обращения 02.02.2014.
URS (2010) The City’s Role in Providing for the Public Equity Financing Needs of UK SMEs. London: URS Corporation.
Vickery S., Jayaram J., Droge C., Calantone R. (2003) The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: An analysis of discrete verse indirect relationships // Journal of Operations Management. Vol. 21. № 5. P. 523-539.
White G.R.T., James P. (2014) Extension of Process Mapping for the Identification of ‘Green Waste' // Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 21. № 5. P. 835-850.
White G.R.T., Lomax M. (2010) Environmental Management Systems: Costs, benefits and an activity theory approach to understanding their knowledge-generating capabilities // The Environmentalist. № 100. P. 12-16.
White G.R.T., Lomax M., Parry G. (2014a) The Implementation of an Environmental Management System in the Not for Profit Sector // Benchmarking: An International Journal. Vol. 21. № 4. P. 509-526.
White G.R.T., Samson P., Rowland-Jones R., Thomas A.J. (2009) The implementation of a quality management system in the not-for-profit sector // The TQM Journal. Vol. 21. № 3. P. 273-283.
White G.R.T., Sarpong D., Ndrecaj V. (2015) Sustainable packaging: Regulations and operational challenges in a manufacturing SME // International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development. Vol. 6. № 3. P. 31-40.
White G.R.T., Wang X., Li D. (2014b) Inter-Organisational Green Packaging Design: A case study of influencing factors and constraints in the automotive supply chain // International Journal of Production Research. Vol. 53. № 21. P. 6551-6566.
Wilding R. (2012) The Logistics of the Games // Management Focus. № 32. P. 22-23.
Wolff M.F. (2006) Global innovation models changing // Research Technology Management. Vol. 49. № 4. P. 5-6.
Zheng J., Knight L., Harland C., Humby S., James K. (2007) An analysis of research into the future of purchasing and supply management // Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management. Vol. 13. № 1. P. 69-83.
de Castro E.A., Rodrigues C., Esteves C., da Rosa Pires A. (2000) The triple helix model as a motor for the creative use of telematics // Research Policy. Vol. 29. P. 193-203.
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.