Ключевые слова
региональная инновационная система
«тройная спираль»
база знаний
синергия
циклы
регионы Норвегии
Как цитировать
Аннотация
Инновационный потенциал любой системы может быть описан как синергетический эффект, возникающий из взаимодействия ее компонентов. Синергию можно считать следствием отрицательной энтропии трех частей системы. В статье анализируется динамика величины этого эффекта применительно к инновационной системе Норвегии в терминах взаимной информации в географическом и отраслевом измерениях, а также в зависимости от размеров компаний. Для измерений применены три методики: анализ временных рядов с использованием показателя Хёрста (R/S-анализ), дискретное преобразование Фурье и географическое разложение синергии. В расчетах использовались данные Статистической службы Норвегии обо всех зарегистрированных норвежских фирмах за период 2002–2014 гг. Результаты показывают, что синергетический эффект как на общенациональном уровне, так и в каждом из семи регионов страны носит нехаотический колебательный характер, резонирующий в пределах естественного диапазона частот. Выявление набора таких частот демонстрирует сложную структуру тройной спирали, которая включает в себя множество элементарных тройных спиралей, теоретически описываемых в терминах фрактального многообразия.
Литература
Abramson N. (1963) Information theory and coding. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Analog Devices (2000) Mixed-Signal and DSP Design Techniques/Ed. W. Kester. Burlington, MA: Analog Devices, Inc.
Boltzmann L. (1974) The second law of thermodynamics. Populare Schriften, Essay 3, address to a formal meeting of the Imperial Academy of Science, 29 May 1886. Reprinted in Ludwig Boltzmann, Theoretical physics and philosophical problem (translated by S.G. Brush). Boston: Reidel (Original work published in 1886).
Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F. (2009) ‘Mode 3' and ‘Quadruple Helix': Toward a 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem//International Journal of Technology Management. Vol. 46. № 3-4. P. 201-234.
De Groot B., Franses P.H. (2008) Stability through cycles//Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 75. P. 301-311.
De Groot B., Franses P.H. (2009) Cycles in basic innovations//Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 76. P. 1021-1025.
De Groot B., Franses P.H. (2012) Common socio-economic cycle periods cycles//Technological Forecasting & Social Change. Vol. 79. P. 56-68.
Dixon R., Shepherd D. (2001) Trends and Cycles in Australian State and Territory Unemployment Rates//The Economic Record. Vol. 77. № 238. Р. 252-269.
Dixon R., Shepherd D. (2013) Regional Dimensions of the Australian Business Cycle//Regional Studies. Vol. 47. № 2. Р. 264-281.
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000) The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations (Introduction to the special Triple Helix issue)//Research Policy. Vol. 29. № 2. Р. 109-123.
Eurostat (2002) Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community, Rev. 1.1 (NACE Rev. 1.1). Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures/index.cfm?TargetUrl=LST_CLS_DLD&StrNom=NACE_1_1, дата обращения 14.04.2018.
Eurostat (2007) NACE Rev. 2 structure and correspondences with NACE Rev 1.1 and ISIC Rev. 4. Режим доступа: http://www.ine.es/daco/daco42/clasificaciones/cnae09/estructura_en.pdf, дата обращения 25.08.2014.
Eurostat (2008) Statistical classification of economic activities in the European Community (NACE Rev. 2). Режим доступа: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5902521/KS-RA-07-015-EN.PDF, дата обращения 14.04.2018.
Feder J. (1988) Fractals. New York: Plenum Press.
Froyland J. (1992) Fractals//Introduction to Chaos and Coherence/Ed. J. Froyland. Bristol: Institute of Physics Publishing. Р. 3-8.
Gibrat R. (1931) Les inégalités économiques. Paris: Sirey.
Hodrick R., Prescott E. (1997) Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation//Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. Vol. 29. № 1. P. 1-16.
Hurst H.E. (1951) Long term storage capacity of reservoirs//Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers. Vol. 116. P. 770-799.
Ivanova I., Leydesdorff L. (2014a) Rotational Symmetry and the Transformation of Innovation Systems in a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations//Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 86. P. 143-156.
Ivanova I., Leydesdorff L. (2014b) A simulation model of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations and decomposition of redundancy//Scientometrics. Vol. 99. № 3. P. 927-948.
Kondratiev N. (1935) The Long Waves in Economic Life//Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 17. P. 105-115.
Krippendorff K. (2009a) W. Ross Ashby's information theory: A bit of history, some solutions to problems, and what we face today//International Journal of General Systems. Vol. 38. № 2. P. 189-212.
Krippendorff K. (2009b) Information of interactions in complex systems//International Journal of General Systems. Vol. 38. № 6. P. 669-680.
Krugman P. (1991) Geography and Trade. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Krugman P. (1993) Lessons of Massachusetts for EMU//Adjustment and Growth in the European Monetary Union/Eds. F. Torres, F. Giavazzi. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press. P. 241-261.
Kuznets S. (1930) Secular Movements in Production and Prices. Their Nature and Their Bearing Upon Cyclical Fluctuations. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Kwon K.S., Park H.W., So M., Leydesdorff L. (2012) Has Globalization Strengthened South Korea's National Research System? National and International Dynamics of the Triple Helix of Scientific Co-authorship Relationships in South Korea//Scientometrics. Vol. 90. № 1. P. 163-176.
Lengyel B., Leydesdorff L. (2011) Regional Innovation Systems in Hungary: The Failing Synergy at the National Level//Regional Studies. Vol. 45. № 5. P. 677-693.
Leydesdorff L. (1995) The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-organization of Scientific Communications. Leiden: DSWO Press; Leiden University.
Leydesdorff L. (2010) Redundancy in systems which entertain a model of themselves: Interaction information and the self-organization of anticipation//Entropy. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 63-79.
Leydesdorff L., Dolfsma W., van der Panne G. (2006) Measuring the Knowledge Base of an Economy in terms of Triple-Helix Relations among ‘Technology, Organization, and Territory'//Research Policy. Vol. 35. № 2. P. 181-199.
Leydesdorff L., Fritsch M. (2006) Measuring the Knowledge Base of Regional Innovation Systems in Germany in Terms of a Triple Helix Dynamics//Research Policy. Vol. 35. № 10. P. 1538-1553.
Leydesdorff L., Ivanova I. (2014) Mutual Redundancies in Inter-Human Communication Systems: Steps Towards a Calculus of Processing Meaning // Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 65. № 2. P. 386-399.
Leydesdorff L., Ivanova I. (2016) ‘Open innovation' and ‘triple helix' models of innovation: Can synergy in innovation systems be measured?//Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity (December 2016). Режим доступа: https://link.springer.com/article/, дата обращения 16.08.2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40852-016-0039-7
Leydesdorff L., Park H.W., Lengyel B. (2014) A Routine for Measuring Synergy in University-Industry-Government Relations: Mutual Information as a Triple-Helix and Quadruple-Helix Indicator//Scientometrics. Vol. 99. № 1. P. 27-35.
Leydesdorff L., Perevodchikov E., Uvarov A. (2015) Measuring Triple-Helix Synergy in the Russian Innovation System at Regional, Provincial, and National Levels // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 66. № 6. P. 1229-1238.
Leydesdorff L., Strand Ø. (2013) The Swedish System of Innovation: Regional Synergies in a Knowledge-Based Economy // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 64. № 9. P. 1890-1902.
Leydesdorff L., Sun Y. (2009) National and International Dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan: University-Industry-Government versus International Co-Authorship Relations // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 60. № 4. P. 778-788.
Leydesdorff L., Zhou P. (2014) Measuring the Knowledge-Based Economy of China in Terms of Synergy among Technological, Organizational, and Geographic Attributes of Firms//Scientometrics. Vol. 98. № 3. P. 1703-1719.
Luckraz S. (2013) On innovation cycles in a finite e discrete R&D game//Economic Modelling. Vol. 30. P. 510-513.
McGill W.J. (1954) Multivariate information transmission//Psychometrika. Vol. 19. № 2. P. 97-116.
Morgan M. (1992) The History of Econometric Ideas//Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 100. № 1. P. 218-222.
Mêgnigbêto E. (2013) Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships in West Africa//Journal of Scientometric Research. Vol. 2. № 3. P. 214-222.
Mêgnigbêto E. (2014) Efficiency, unused capacity and transmission power as indicators of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relationships//Journal of Informetrics. Vol. 8. P. 284-294.
Qian B., Rasheed K. (2004) Hurst exponent and financial market predictability. Paper presented at the IASTED conference on Financial Engineering and Applications, November 8-10, 2004, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. Режим доступа: https://bit.ly/2nKqx6W, дата обращения 12.11.2017.
Samuels J.M. (1965) Size and the Growth of Firms//The Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 105-112.
Schumpeter J. (1939) Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of Capitalist Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Shannon C.E. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication//Bell System Technical Journal. Vol. 27. № 3-4. P. 379-423, 623-656.
Statistics Norway (2015) Establishments Data. Режим доступа: https://www.ssb.no/statistikkbanken/selecttable/hovedtabellHjem.asp?KortNavnWeb=bedrifter&CMSSubjectArea=virksomheter-foretak-og-regnskap&PLanguage=1&checked=true, дата обращения 18.04.2016.
Strand Ø., Ivanova I., Leydesdorff L. (2016) Decomposing the Triple-Helix system into the regional innovation systems of Norway: Firm data and patent networks//Quality & Quantity. -z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0344
Strand Ø., Leydesdorff L. (2013) Where is Synergy in the Norwegian Innovation System Indicated? Triple Helix Relations among Technology, Organization, and Geography//Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 80. № 3. P. 471-484.
Theil H. (1972) Statistical Decomposition Analysis. Amsterdam, London: North-Holland.
Ulanowicz R.E. (1986) Growth and development: Ecosystems phenomenology. New-York: Springer-Verlag.
Ye F., Yu S., Leydesdorff L. (2013) The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations at the Country Level, and Its Dynamic Evolution under the Pressures of Globalization // Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 64. № 11. P. 2317-2325.
Yeung R.W. (2008) Information theory and network coding. New York: Springer.
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.