Аннотация
По мере повышения значимости и расширения сферы применения Форсайт-исследований возрастает роль различных участников таких проектов и конечных пользователей их результатов — заинтересованных сторон, или стейкхолдеров. Если ранее значительная часть Форсайт-проектов выполнялась с привлечением профессиональных экспертов, то круг участников многих новейших исследований стал более разнообразным благодаря включению представителей общественности и других потенциальных бенефициаров. Подобная диверсификация субъектов Форсайт-исследований позволяет максимально учесть интересы всех сторон и обеспечить применимость результатов без ущерба для их качества при сохранении высокой роли экспертов. В статье предлагается систематическое изложение метода анализа стейкхолдеров, изучены теория и лучшие практики применения данного подхода, рассматриваются место и роль различных стейкхолдеров в Форсайт-проектах, оцениваются основные проблемы, возможности и рекомендации по применению указанной методологии, в том числе в сочетании с другими методами Форсайта.
Литература
Калайчи Э. (2017) Взаимоотношения стейкхолдеров и технологических предпринимателей в наукоемких стартапах: опыт Турции. Форсайт, 11(3), 61-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.3.61.70
Ципес Г.Л., Шадаева Н.М. (2015) Управление отношениями с заинтересованными сторонами проекта: от простого к сложному. Управление проектами и программами, (2-3), 138-156.
Afshari H., Agnihotri S., Searcy C., Mohamad Y. (2022) Social Sustainability Indicators: A Comprehensive Review with Application in the Energy Sector. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 31(1), 263-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.018
Andersen D., Hansen M., Selin C. (2021) Stakeholder inclusion in scenario planning - A review of European projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, 120802. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120802
Boddy D., Paton R. (2004) Responding to competing narratives: Lessons for project managers. International Journal of Project Management, 22, 225-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2003.07.001
Chinseu L., Dougill J., Stringer C. (2022) Strengthening Conservation Agriculture Innovation Systems in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons from a Stakeholder Analysis. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 20(1) 17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2021.1911511
Clarkson M. (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258888
Donaldson T., Preston F. (1995) The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258887
European Commission (2002) A Practical Guide to Regional Foresight in the United Kingdom, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission (2015) Concurrent Design Foresight. Report to the European Commission of the Expert Group on Foresight Modelling, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission (2020) Societal engagement with key enabling technologies, Brussels: European Commission.
European Parliament (2021) The future of crop protection in Europe. STUDY Panel for the Future of Science and Technology, Strasbourg: European Parliamentary Research Service.
Farmaki A., Stergiou D. (2020) Corporate social responsibility and employee moral identity: A practice-based approach. Current Issues in Tourism, 24(18), 2554-2572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1850654
Freeman R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Boston, MA: Pitman.
Gokhberg L., Meissner D., Sokolov A. (2016) Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers: Creating Opportunities Through Public Policies and Corporate Strategies in Science, Technology and Innovation, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
Guaita-García N., Martínez-Fernández J., Javier Barrera-Causil C., Carl Fitz H. (2022) Stakeholder analysis and prioritization of management measures for a sustainable development in the social-ecological system of the Mar Menor (SE, Spain), Environmental Development, 42, 100701. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2022.100701
Gudowsky N., Sotoudeh M., Capari L., Wilfing H. (2017) Transdisciplinary forward-looking agenda setting for age-friendly, human centered cities. Futures, 90, 16-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2017.05.005
Harrison S., John H. (1996) Managing and partnering with external stakeholders. The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), 10(2), 46-60. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4165323.
Iglesias-Sanchez P., Fayolle A., Jambrino-Maldonado C., Heras-Pedrosa C. (2022) Open innovation for entrepreneurial opportunities: How can stakeholder involvement foster new products in science and technology-based start-ups? Helion, 8(12), e11897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11897
JRC (2019) The future of government 2030+. A citizen centric perspective on new government models, Seville: Joint Research Centre (European Commission). https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/9e71bf1b-3bd8-11e9-8d04-01aa75ed71a1/language-en, дата обращения 29.11.2023.
Lindborg H. (2013) Stake Your Ground: Unearthing the origins of stakeholder management. Quality Progress, 2, 1-3.
Mainardes E., Alves H., Raposo M. (2012) A model for stakeholder classification and stakeholder relationships. Management Decision, 50(10), 1861-1879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211279648
Maj J. (2020) Stakeholder Approach to Diversity Management: Stakeholder Analysis in Polish Organizations. The International Journal of Organizational Diversity, 20(1), 25-43,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/2328-6261/CGP/v20i01/25-43
Miles I., Saritas O., Sokolov A. (2016) Foresight for Science Technology and Innovation, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.
Mir F., Rezania D. (2021) The Interactive Use of Management Control Systems and Information Technology Project Performance: A Conceptual Framework. Accounting Perspectives, 20(4), 719-741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3838.12269
Mitchell R., Agle B., Wood D. (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-858. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
Olander S., Landin A. (2005) Evaluation of stakeholder influence in the implementation of construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23(4), 321-328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2005.02.002
Pereno A., Eriksson D. (2020) A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures, 122, 102605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102605
Pólvora A., Nascimento S., Lourenço J., Scapolo F. (2020) Blockchain for industrial transformations: A forward-looking approach with multi-stakeholder engagement for policy advice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 157, 120091. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120091
Pramono R., Palupi L., Aditya R. (2022) Urban Development Project Evaluation Using Multi-Stakeholder Cost-Benefit Analysis. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 240-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.4_240
Raum S. (2018) A framework for integrating systematic stakeholder analysis in ecosystem services research: Stakeholder mapping for forest ecosystem services in the UK, Ecosystem Services, 29(A), 170-184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.001
Reed M., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C., Stringer L. (2009) Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
Sajadi S., Majdzadeh R., Yazdizadeh B., Mohtasham F., Mohseni M., Doshmangir L., Lavis J. (2019) A roadmap for strengthening evidence informed health policy-making in Iran: Protocol for a research programme. Health Research Policy and Systems, 17, 50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0455-9
Saritas S., Pace L., Stalpers S. (2013) Stakeholder participation and dialogue in foresight. In: Participation and Interaction in Foresight (eds. K. Borch, S. Dingli, M. Jørgensen), Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, pp. 35-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781956144
Savage G., Nix T., Whitehead C., Blair J. (1991) Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive, 5(2), 61-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4165008
Schmeer K. (1999) Guidelines for conducting a stakeholder analysis, Bethesda, MA: PHR, Abt Associates.
Shantiko B., Liswanti N., Bourgeois R., Laumonier Y. (2021) Land-use Decisions in Complex Commons: Engaging Multiple Stakeholders through Foresight and Scenario Building in Indonesia. Environmental Management, 68(5), 642-664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01470-1
Slabá M., Martíšková P., Svec R. (2019) Stakeholder Identification and Selection - Two Steps of Stakeholder Analysis for Management Strategic Decision-Making. In: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference (IBIMA) (ed. K.S. Soliman) (1st ed.), Norristown, PA: International Business Information Management Association (IBIMA), pp. 1556-1564.
Slunge D., Drakenberg O., Ekbom A., Sahlin U. (2017) Stakeholder Interaction in Research Processes - A Guide for Researchers and Research Groups, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28518.22080
Sokolova A., Grebenyuk A., Sokolov A. (2018) Twenty years of S&T priority setting in Russia: Lessons learned. Foresight, 20(5), 449-466. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2018-0033
SRI (1963) Internal memo (unpublished), Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Research Institute.
UNECE (2021) Stakeholder analysis. How to Map, Analyse, and Engage Stakeholders in the Development of a Strategic Framework for Mainstreaming Ageing, Vienna: United Nations. https://unece.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/Tool-Stakeholder-Analysis.pdf.
Zhuang T., Qian Q., Visscher H., Elsinga M., Wu W. (2019) The role of stakeholders and their participation network in decision-making of urban renewal in China. International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 92, 47-58,. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.03.014
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.