Ключевые слова
конус будущего (FC)
разработка стратегий
устойчивость
стратегический Форсайт
неопределенность
философия
когнитивная психология
квантовая физика
история и философия науки
сложные адаптивные системы (САС)
Как цитировать
Аннотация
К середине 2020-х годов традиционные методологии стратегического прогнозирования продемонстрировали свою ограниченную применимость в условиях нарастающей сложности и неопределенности глобальных процессов. В статье предпринимается попытка преодолеть эти ограничения, в частности через отказ от ранее применявшейся модели конуса будущего (Futures Cone, FC). Исследование базируется на концептуальном анализе с опорой на системное мышление, науки о сложности и принципы совместного проектирования (participatory design). В качестве альтернативы предлагается новая аналитическая рамка адаптивной сетевой модели (Adaptive Futures Mesh, AFM), обеспечивающей более эффективное управление неопределенностью благодаря учету «неизвестных неизвестных» переменных.
AFM визуализирует каскадные воздействия с акцентом на человеческой агентности, а работа с петлями обратной связи позволяет адаптироваться к меняющимся условиям. К ограничениям исследования относится отсутствие эмпирической проверки AFM и вероятные затруднения при внедрении в различных контекстах. Вместе с тем, она обладает значительным потенциалом по оптимизации практики стратегического планирования. С ее помощью организации смогут выйти за узкие рамки прогнозирования, повышая готовность к будущему и стратегическую устойчивость в условиях сложности и поликризиса.
Литература
Anderson E.E. (1971) Modern physics and quantum mechanics, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
Bendor R., Eriksson E., Pargman D. (2021) Looking backward to the future: On past-facing approaches to futuring. Futures, 125, 102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102666
Bohr N. (2011) Atomic theory and the description of nature: Four essays with an introductory survey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapman G.B., Johnson E.J. (1994) The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(4), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960070402
Choudhury P.P. (2023) Formation of multiphase plasma in galactic haloes and an analogy to solar plasma. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 1155865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1155865
Colosi D., Rovelli C. (2009) What is a particle? Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(2), 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/2/025002
Copenhaver R. (2019) Philosophy of mind in the early modern and modern ages, New York: Routledge.
Cristofaro M., Sousa M.J., Sánchez-García J.C., Larsson A. (eds.) (2021) Managerial and entrepreneurial decision making: Emerging issues, Basel: MDPI.
Drees L., Liehr S., Batbuyan B., Marg O., Mehring M. (2022) In search of a nomadic pastoralism for the 21st century. A transdisciplinary development of future scenarios to foster a social-ecological transformation in Mongolia. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(3), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2100744
Eliade M., Trask W.R., Smith J.Z. (2018) The myth of the eternal return: Cosmos and history (1st ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Érdi P. (2008) Complexity explained, Cham: Springer.
Estrada E. (2024) What is a complex system, after all? Foundations of Science, 29(4), 1143–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09917-w
Futch M.J. (2008) Leibniz’s metaphysics of time and space, Cham: Springer.
Gall T., Vallet F., Yannou B. (2022) How to visualise futures studies concepts: Revision of the futures cone. Futures, 143, 103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103024
Garrett K., Duda G. (2011) Dark Matter: A Primer. Advances in Astronomy, 2011, 968283. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/968283
Hancock T., Bezold C. (1994) Possible futures, preferable futures. Healthcare Forum Journal, 37(2), 23–29.
Hawking S.W. (2011) A brief history of time: From the big bang to black holes, New York: Bantam.
Hawking S.W., Penrose R. (2015) The nature of space and time (2nd ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834747
Heisenberg W. (2013) Physical principles of the quantum theory (first published in 1930), New York: Dover Publications.
Henchey N. (1977) The future of Quebec: Alternative scenarios. McGill Journal of Education, 12(1), 17–27.
Hutton S. (1977) Some renaissance critiques of Aristotle’s theory of time. Annals of Science, 34(4), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797700200271
Hvidtfeldt R. (2018) The structure of interdisciplinary science, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4
Hynes W., Lees M., Müller J.M. (eds.) (2020) Systemic thinking for policy making: The potential of systems analysis for addressing global policy challenges in the 21st century, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/879c4f7a-en
Jaffe A. (2018) The illusion of time. Nature, 556(7701), 304–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04558-7
Kunseler E.-M., Tuinstra W., Vasileiadou E., Petersen A.C. (2015) The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders. Futures, 66, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.006
Maltarich M., Havrylyshyn A. (2023) The emergence engine: Socially mediated individual change. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1), 13126. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.84bp
Mangnus A.C., Oomen J., Vervoort J.M., Hajer M.A. (2021) Futures literacy and the diversity of the future. Futures, 132, 102793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102793
Mao H., Liu S. (2023) Research on the influence of innovative design based on the futures cone In: Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Computer Technology and Media Convergence Design (CTMCD 2022) (eds. K. Subramanian, J. Ouyang, W. Wei.), New York: Atlantis Press International BV, vol. 99, pp. 403–410. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-046-6_48
Meadows D.H., Wright D. (2008) Thinking in systems: A primer, London: Chelsea Green Pub.
Merleau-Ponty M. (2004) World of perception, New York: Routledge.
Migone A., Howlett M. (2024) Multiple streams and plausibility cones: Using concepts from future studies to depict policy dynamics. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(5–6), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2381769
Miller R. (2018) Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century, New York: Routledge.
Muntwiler C. (2023) Cognitive biases and debiasing in strategic decision making (PhD thesis), St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.
Nickerson R.S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Nozick R. (2001) Invariances: The structure of the objective world, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Oosterling H.A.F., Tiemersma D. (eds.) (1996) Time and temporality in intercultural perspective, Leiden (Netherlands): Brill.
Overton W.F. (1994) The arrow of time and the cycle of time: Concepts of change, cognition, and embodiment. Psychological Inquiry, 5(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0503_9
Partelow S. (2018) A review of the social-ecological systems framework. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 26796887. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796887
Raczkowski K., Komorowski P. (eds.) (2025) International economic policy for the polycrisis, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003487913
Ramos V.J. (2019) Analyzing the role of cognitive biases in the decision making process, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Rovelli C. (2007) Quantum gravity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schliesser E. (2013) Newton’s philosophy of time. In: A companion to the philosophy of time (eds. H. Dyke, A. Bardon), New York: Wiley, pp. 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118522097.ch6
Skov M., Nadal M. (eds.) (2023) The Routledge international handbook of neuroaesthetics, New York: Routledge.
Stechert P. (2006) Informatics system comprehension: A learner-centred cognitive approach to networked thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9014-4
Sterman J.D. (2000) Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (International student edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park E., Shin H. (2024) Contextualizing comedy techniques for speculative design: Unraveling futures cone from sketch comedy series, ‘2032/2033 futures’. Paper presented at the DRS2024 Conference, 23–28 June, Boston, USA. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.433
Tabatabaei N. (2011) Detecting weak signals by internet-based environmental scanning (Master’s Thesis), Waterloo: University of Waterloo.
Taleb N.N. (2010) The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (2nd ed.), New York: Random House.
Taleb N.N. (2012) Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder, New York: Random House.
Van den Ende M.A., Wardekker A., Hegger D.L.T., Mees H.L.P., Vervoort J.M. (2022) Reflection: Applying participatory foresight methods in practice. In: Towards a climate-resilient future together (eds. M.A. van den Ende, A. Wardekker, D.L.T. Hegger, H.L.P. Mees, J.M. Vervoort), Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07682-4_4
Varela F.J., Depraz N. (2005) At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 61–81.
Voros J. (2003) A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379
Walker B., Holling C.S., Carpenter S.R., Kinzig A.P. (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
Winkler J., Moser R. (2016) Biases in future-oriented Delphi studies: A cognitive perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021
Zavala Rodríguez E.B., Marco Gómez J., Franch Gutiérrez J. (2019) Towards adaptative monitoring for self-adaptative systems, Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.