Агентность и нарративная креативность как инструменты трансформационного перехода
PDF Рус
PDF (English)

Ключевые слова

трансформационная агентность
инновации
трансформационные переходы
динамические способности
компании-единороги
масштабирование агентности
нарративная теория

Как цитировать

СорокинП. (2025). Агентность и нарративная креативность как инструменты трансформационного перехода. Форсайт, 19(3), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.27980

Аннотация

В условиях череды разного рода глобальных кризисов фронтиром для научных дискуссий становится тема трансформационных переходов масштабных социально-экономических систем к новой модели развития. Растет потребность в субъектах, способных эффективно управлять подобными всеобъемлющими радикальными преобразованиями, с фокусом на инновациях. Вопросы наращивания человеческой агентности трансформационного типа (ТА) всегда были предметом повышенной актуальности. Тем не менее, градус востребованности этой компетенции резко увеличился в современном мире высокой турбулентности, изменчивости и неустойчивости, на фоне сложного характера получающих распространение моделей развития «Индустрии 4.0. и 5.0», а также исчерпания потенциала тех управленческих инструментов, которые были действенными в прежних, относительно стабильных контекстах.

В статье изучаются возможности формирования и масштабирования ТА, предлагаются методы работы с этим сложным, трудноуловимым феноменом для обеспечения успешного развития. Опираясь на ряд концепций (включая собственную разработку) и практические кейсы, автор раскрывает «черный ящик» ТА, вносит ясность в процессы правильного формирования редких, преображающих способностей. В представленных выводах раскрываются источники обновляющего потенциала для управленческих систем, обретение которого позволит разным организациям успешно адаптироваться к усложняющемуся потоку перемен.

https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.27980
PDF Рус
PDF (English)

Литература

Корешникова Ю.Н., Сорокин П.С. (2024) От бихевиоризма к неоконструктивизму: обзор образовательных теорий для задач развития самостоятельности в условиях неоструктурации. Вопросы образования, 4, 126–150. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-17084

Сорокин П.С., Афанасьева И.А., Шмаевка В.К., Новикова В.Д. (2025) Востребованность индивидуальной агентности и формы ее поддержки: мета-анализ мирового и российского опыта. Журнал исследований социальной политики, 1 (в печати).

Сорокин П.С., Редько Т.Д. (2024) Современные исследования агентности в сфере образования: систематизация ключевых понятий и разработок. Вопросы образования, 1, 236–264. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-18131

Сорокин П.С. (2023) Проблема «агентности» через призму новой реальности: состояние и направления развития. Социологические исследования, 3, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.31857/S013216250022927-2

Сорокин П.С., Фрумин И.Д. (2022) Образование как источник действия, совершенствующего структуры: теоретические подходы и практические задачи. Вопросы образования, 1, 116–137. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-116-137

Anderson J., Rainie L. (2025) Expert Views on the Impact of AI on the Essence of Being Human, Elon, NC: Elon University’s Imagining the Digital Future Center.

Archer M.S. (2013) Social Morphogenesis, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer.

Avelino F., Wittmayer J.M. (2016) Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259

Avelino F., Wittmayer J.M., Pel B., Weaver P., Dumitru A., Haxeltine A., Kemp R., Jørgensen M.S., Bauler T., Ruijsink S., O’Riordan T. (2019) Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.002

Becker G. (1962) Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 9–49.

Beetham D. (1987) Bureaucracy, Milton Keynes (UK): Open University Press.

Behl A., Singh R., Pereira V., Laker B. (2023) Analysis of Industry 4.0 and circular economy enablers: A step towards resilient sustainable operations management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189, 122363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122363

Bernhold T., Münster F.H., Wiesweg N. (2021) Principal-Agent Theory: Perspectives and practices for effective workplace solutions. In: A Handbook of Management Theories and Models for Office Environments and Services (eds. R. Appel-Meulenbroek, V. Danivska), New York: Routledge, pp. 117–128.

Bosman R. (2022) Into transition space: Destabilisation and incumbent agency in an accelerating energy transition (PhD thesis), Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.

Bromley P., Meyer J.W. (2021) Hyper-management: Neoliberal expansions of purpose and leadership. Organization Theory, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211020327

Brown R., Mawson S., Rocha А., Rowe А. (2025) Looking inside the ‘black box’ of digital firm scaling: An ethnographically informed conceptualisation. Journal of Business Research, 186, 114987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114987

Carayannis E.G., Dumitrescu R., Falkowski T., Zota N.R. (2024) Empowering SMEs: Harnessing the potential of Gen AI the potential of Gen AI for resilience and competitiveness. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 3456820. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2024.3456820

Cavazzoni F., Fiorini A., Veronese G. (2022) How do we assess how agentic we are? A literature review of existing instruments to evaluate and measure individuals’ agency. Social Indicators Research, 3, 1125–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02791-8

Coad A., Domnick C., Flachenecker F., Harasztosi P., Janiri M.L., Pal R., Teruel M. (2021) Capacity constraints as a trigger for high growth. Small Business Economics, 59, 893–923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-021-00558-6

Dealroom (2023) The European Deep Tech Report, Amsterdam: DealroomCo.

DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

Emirbayer M., Mische A. (1998) What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103 (4), 962–1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294

Erstad O., Miño-Puigcercós R., Rivera-Vargas P. (2025) Paths towards transformative agency — Creating repertoires for socio-educational change. Acta Psychologica, 255, 104894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104894

Eteläpelto A., Vähäsantanen K., Hökkä P., Paloniemi S. (2013) What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001

Fischer L.B., Newig J. (2016) Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability, 8(5), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476

Fletcher A., Benveniste M. (2025) Narrative Creativity: An Introduction to How and Why, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Fletcher A., Benveniste M. (2022) A new method for training creativity: Narrative as an alternative to divergent thinking. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1512(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14763

Fligstein N., McAdam D. (2012) A Theory of Fields, Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press.

Golovianko M., Terziyan V., Branytskyi V., Malyk D. (2023) Industry 4.0 vs. Industry 5.0: Co-existence, Transition, or a Hybrid. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.206

Grillitsch M., Sotarauta M., Asheim B., Fitjar R.D., Haus-Reve S., Kolehmainen J., Stihl L. (2023) Agency and economic change in regions: Identifying routes to new path development using qualitative comparative analysis. Regional Studies, 57(8), 1453–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2022.2053095

Grin J., Rotmans J., Schot J. (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long-term transformative change, New York: Routledge.

Grove A. (1999) Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company, New York: Crown Currency.

Haan F.J., Rotmans J. (2018) A proposed theoretical framework for actors in transformative change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017

Hansen S., Bertel L.B. (2023) Becoming a Creative Genius: How a Creative Learning Environment Can Facilitate Transdisciplinary Engagement and Creative Mindsets in a Life-Long Learning Perspective. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v11i2.7781

Hartman A. (2003) The competitor: Jack Welch’s burning platform, New York: Prentice Hall.

Henriksen D., Creely E., Henderson M. (2019) Failing in Creativity: The Problem of Policy and Practice in Australia and the United States. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 55 (1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2019.1549429

Kim K. (2016) The Creativity Challenge: How We Can Recapture American Innovation, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.

Klees S.J. (2016) Human capital and rates of return: Brilliant ideas or ideological dead ends? Comparative Education Review, 60(4), 644–672. https://doi.org/10.1086/688063

Klemenčič M. (2023) A theory of student agency in higher education. In: Research Handbook on the Student Experience in Higher Education (eds. C. Baik, E.R. Kahu), Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 25–40.

Kuckertz A., Brändle L., Gaudig A., Hinderer S., Morales R., Carlos A., Prochotta A., Steinbrink K., Berger E. (2020) Startups in Times of Crisis – A Rapid Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00169

Kumpulainen K., Sairanen H., Nordström A. (2020) Young children’s digital literacy practices in the sociocultural contexts of their homes. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 20(3), 472–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798420925116

Loorbach D., Frantzeskaki N., Avelino F. (2017) Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340

Ma E., Du J., Xu S.T., Wang Y.C., Lin X. (2022) When proactive employees meet the autonomy of work — A moderated mediation model based on agency theory and job characteristics theory. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 107, 103326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103326

Machado de Oliveira V. (2021) Hospicing Modernity: Facing Humanity’s Wrongs and the Implications for Social Activism, Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.

Markard J., Raven R., Truffer B. (2012) Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013

McInerney D.M. (2013) Educational Psychology: Constructing Learning, Sydney: Pearson Australia.

McKelvey B. (2010) Complexity leadership: The secret of Jack Welch’s success. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 1, 4–36.

Meyer J.W. (1977) The effects of education as an institution. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2777763?origin=JSTOR-pdf

Meyer J.W. (2010) World society, institutional theories, and the actor. Annual Review of Sociology, 36(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102506

Moroz P.W., Gamble E.N. (2021) Business model innovation as a window into adaptive tensions: Five paths on the B Corp journey. Journal of Business Research, 125, 672–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.01.046

Muñoz P., Kibler E., Mandakovic V., Amorós J.E. (2022) Local entrepreneurial ecosystems as configural narratives: A new way of seeing and evaluating antecedents and outcomes. Research Policy, 51(9), 104065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104065

Nabi G., Liñán F., Fayolle A., Krueger N., Walmsley A. (2017) The impact of entrepreneurship education in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(2), 277–299. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2015.0026

Notermans I., von Wirth T., Loorbach D. (2022) An Experiential Guide for Transition Arenas, Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.

OECD (2018) The Future We Want. The Future of Education and Skills, Education 2030, Paris: OECD.

Ozmen G.O., Winslow B., Andolina S., Antona M., Bodenschatz A., Coursaris C., Xu W. (2023) Six human-centered artificial intelligence grand challenges. International Journal of Human – Computer Interaction, 39(3), 391–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2153320

Psacharopoulos G., Patrinos H.A. (2018) Returns to investment in education: A decennial review of the global literature. Education Economics, 26(5), 445–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2018.1484426

Rampa R., Agogué M. (2021) Developing radical innovation capabilities: Exploring the effects of training employees for creativity and innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 30(1), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12423

Rappleye J., Silova I., Komatsu H., Takayama K. (2024) A radical proposal: Evidence-based SDG 4 discussions. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102930

Reeve J., Cheon S.H., Yu T.H. (2020) An autonomy-supportive intervention to develop students’ resilience by boosting agentic engagement. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(4), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420911103

Rodrigues C., de Noronha M. (2021) What companies can learn from unicorn startups to overcome the COVID-19 crisis. Innovation & Management Review, 20(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-01-2021-0011

Rotmans J., Kemp R., van Asselt M. (2001) More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003

Schofer E., Ramirez F.O., Meyer J.W. (2021) The societal consequences of higher education. Sociology of Education, 94(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040720942912

Schultz T.W. (1960) Capital Formation by Education. The Journal of Political Economy, 68(6), 571–583. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1829945

Schultz T.W. (1975) The value of the ability to deal with disequilibria. Journal of Economic Literature, 13(3), 827–846. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2722032

Sirisha D., Dutta S. (2002) GE and Jack Welch (Case-Reference no. 402-006-1), Hyderabad (India): IBS Center for Management.

Shahid Y. (2023) Can Fast Growing Unicorns Revive Productivity and Economic Performance?, Washington, D.C.: Center for Global Development.

Slater R. (2001) Get Better Or Get Beaten: 29 Leadership Secrets from GE’s Jack Welch, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Snowman J., Biehler R.F. (2005) Psychology Applied to Teaching, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Sorokin P.S., Chernenko S.E. (2022) Skills as declared learning outcomes of entrepreneurship training in higher education institutions across the globe: Classification and analysis with a focus on thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101177

Sorokin P. S., Mironenko I.A. (2025) The Replicability Crisis and Human Agency in the Neo-Structured World. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 59(12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09887-z

Sternad D., Modritscher G. (2022) Entrepreneurial leaps: Growth processes in transition phases between dynamic states. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46 (4), 952–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258720929890

Stetsenko A. (2019) Radical-Transformative Agency: Continuities and Contrasts With Relational Agency and Implications for Education. Frontiers in Education, 4, 00148. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00148

Stetsenko A. (2020) Radical-transformative agency: Developing a transformative activist stance on a Marxist-Vygotskyan foundation. In: Revisiting Vygotsky for social change: Bringing together theory and practice (eds. A.T. Neto, F. Liberali, M. Dafermos), New York: Peter Lang, pp. 31–62.

Testa S., Nielsen K.R., Vallentin S., Ciccullo F. (2022) Sustainability-oriented Innovation in the Agri-food M System: Current Issues and the Road Ahead. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, 121653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121653

Udehn L. (2002) The changing face of methodological individualism. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 479–507. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3069250

UNDP (2024) Human development report 2023/2024. Breaking the gridlock, Geneva: United Nations.

Varfolomeeva A. (2021) Destructive care: Emotional engagements in mining narratives. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 9(1), 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.3539

Virkkunen J. (2006) Dilemmas in Building Shared Transformative Agency. Activites Revue Electornique, 3, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1850

Wieland A., Durach C. (2021) Two perspectives on supply chain resilience. Journal of Business Logistics, 42(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12271

WIPO (2023) World Intellectual Property Indicators 2023, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.