Keywords
user innovation
open innovation
lead users
innovation communities
knowledge sharing
How to Cite
Abstract
User innovation is the result of information asymmetry. Manufacturers are not completely aware of consumer needs; as a result, skilled users can improve products and suit them to their needs. Users best judge what will lead to commercial success, and they have long been recognized as a valuable source of knowledge to harvest for future innovation. Therefore, firms now involve customers in developing product ideas that are usable and valuable. The challenge is that valuable consumer-related knowledge is widely dispersed, and aggregating it is a complex and expensive task. However, the development of ICT opens up new possibilities, in particular, for innovation communities linking users with different needs and experiences. Interaction with users allows companies to integrate distributed knowledge, which gives the opportunity to improve the functionality and quality of the developed products.
This paper analyses trends of user innovation development, their motivations to participate in innovation communities, the benefits that the company can gain from interaction with these communities, and the risks associated with a particular focus on the needs of a limited or overly wide range of consumers. It provides cases of user innovation in a number of sectors: software, hardware, construction, sports, medicine, fashion and design.
The authors conclude that innovation communities are a powerful tool allowing integration of the dispersed knowledge of users into strategic decision making. The knowledge generation of inputs from innovation communities is facilitated by new analysis and data mining tools that make it easy to visualize and detect structures in virtual communication. The use of such instruments has large innovation potential if companies succeed in integrating real life conditions into technical innovations.
References
Alam I. (2006) Removing the fuzziness from the fuzzy front-end of service innovations through customer interactions // Industrial Marketing Management. Vol. 35. № 4. P. 468-480.
Antioco M., Moenaert R.K., Lindgreen A. (2008) Reducing ongoing product design decision-making bias // Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 25. P. 528-545.
Baldwin C., Hienerth C., von Hippel E. (2006) How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study // Research Policy. Vol. 35. P. 1291-1313.
Boschma R.A., Ter Wal A.L.J. (2007) Knowledge networks and innovative performance in an industrial district: The case of a footwear district in the South of Italy // Industry and Innovation. Vol. 14. № 2. Р. 177-199.
Chesbrough H. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Enos J.L. (1962) Petroleum progress and profits: A history of process innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Faraj S., Jarvenpaa S.L., Majchrzak A. (2011) Knowledge collaboration in online communities // Organization Science. Vol. 22. P. 1224-1239.
Franke N., von Hippel E., Schreier M. (2006) Finding commercially attractive user innovations: А test of lead-user theory // Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 23. P. 301-315.
Füller J., Matzler K. (2007) Virtual product experience and customer participation - A chance for customer-centred, really new products // Technovation. Vol. 27. P. 378-387.
Gertler M.S., Levitte Y.M. (2005) Local nodes in global networks: The geography of knowledge flows in biotechnology innovation // Industry and Innovation. Vol. 12. № 4. Р. 487-507.
Hargadon A.B., Bechky B.A. (2006) When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work // Organization Science. Vol. 17. P. 484-500.
Hienerth C. (2006) The commercialization of user innovations: The development of the rodeo kayak industry // R&D Management. Vol. 36. № 3. Р. 273-294.
Hyysalo S. (2009) User innovation and everyday practices: Micro-innovation in sports industry development // R&D Management. Vol. 39. № 3. Р. 247-258.
Jaworski B., Kohli A.K. (1993) Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences // Journal of Marketing. Vol. 57. P. 53-70.
Jeppesen L.B., Frederiksen L. (2006) Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments // Organization Science. Vol. 17. № 1. Р. 45-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0156
Kretschmer T., Bolliger K., Koob C. (2010) LIFE 2 - Innovation through Collaboration. Bonn: D-Telekom.
Kristensson P., Gustafsson A., Archer T. (2004) Harnessing the creative potential among users // Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 21. P. 4-14.
Lerner J., Tirole J. (2002) The simple economics of open source // The Journal of Industrial Economics. Vol. 50. № 2. P. 197-234.
Lüthje C. (2004) Characteristics of innovating users in a consumer goods field: An empirical study of sport-related product consumers // Technovation. Vol. 24. № 9. P. 683-695.
Lüthje C., Herstatt C., von Hippel E. (2005) User-innovators and «local» information: The case of mountain biking // Research Policy. Vol. 34. P. 951-965.
Maaß F., Führmann B. (2012) Innovationstätigkeit im Mittelstand - Messung und Bewertung. IfM-Materialien № 212. Bonn: Institut für Mittelstandsforschung.
Morrison P.D., Roberts J.H., Midgley D.F. (2004) The nature of lead users and measurement of leading edge status // Research Policy. Vol. 33. № 2. Р. 351-362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.007
Niebuhr A. (2010) Migration and innovation: Does cultural diversity matter for regional R and D activity? // Papers in Regional Science. Vol. 89. № 3. Р. 563-585.
Ogawa S., Pongtanalert K. (2011) Visualizing Invisible Innovation Content: Evidence from Global User Innovation Surveys. SSRN Working Paper Series. Режим доступа: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract id=1876186, дата обращения 14.09.2013.
Osterloh M., Rota S. (2007) Open source software development - Just another case of collective invention? // Research Policy. Vol. 36. № 2. Р. 157-171.
Outdoor Foundation (2009) 2009 Outdoor Recreation Participation Report. Boulder, CO: The Outdoor Foundation.
Perry-Smith E.J. (2006) Social, yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity // Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 49. P. 85-110.
Porter C.E., Naveen D. (2008) Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities // Management Science. Vol. 54. № 1. Р. 113-128.
Porter M. (2000) Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Networks in a Global Economy // Economic Development Quarterly. Vol. 14. № 1. Р. 15-34.
Prause G., Hunke K. (2012) University - Business Interaction in the Context of Demographic Change // European Integration and Baltic Sea Region Studies: University- Business Partnership through the Triple Helix Approach / Eds. T. Muravskaya, G. Prause. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Р. 190-203.
Riggs W., von Hippel E. (1994) The Impact of Scientific and Commercial Values on the Sources of Scientific Instrument Innovation // Research Policy. Vol. 23. P. 459-469.
Rohracher H. (ed.) (2005) User involvement in innovation processes. Strategies and limitations from a socio-technical perspective. München, Vienna: Profil Verlag.
Sawhney M., Prandelli E. (2000) Communities of creation: Managing distributed knowledge in turbulent markets // California Management Review. Vol. 42. P. 24-54.
Schreier M., Pruegl R. (2008) Extending lead-user theory: Antecedents and consequences of consumers' lead userness // Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 25. P. 331-346.
Shah S. (2006) Motivation, governance, and the viability of hybrid forms in open source software development // Management Science. Vol. 52. № 7. Р. 1000-1014.
Shah S., Tripsas M. (2004) When do user-innovators start firms? Towards a theory of user entrepreneurship. Working Paper 04-0106. Chicago: University of Illinois.
Simon H. (2007) Hidden Champions des 21. Jahrhunderts: Die Erfolgsstrategien der unbekannten Weltmarktführer. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
Stuart T., Sorenson O. (2003) The geography of opportunity: Spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms // Research Policy. Vol. 32. № 2. Р. 229-253.
Urban G., von Hippel E. (1988) Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products // Management Science. Vol. 34. № 5. Р. 569-582.
Von Hippel E. (1976) The dominant role of users in the scientific instrument innovation process // Research Policy. Vol. 5. № 3. Р. 212-239.
Von Hippel E. (1978) Users as innovators // Technology Review. Vol. 80. № 3. Р. 3-11.
Von Hippel E. (1986) Lead users: A source of novel product concepts // Management Science. Vol. 32. № 7. P. 791-805.
Von Hippel E. (2005) Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Von Hippel E., Ogawa S., de Jong J.P.J. (2011) The age of the consumer-innovator // MIT Sloan Management Review. Vol. 53. № 1. Р. 27-35.
Von Hippel E., de Jong J.P.J., Flowers S. (2012) Comparing business and household sector innovation in consumer products: Findings from a representative study in the United Kingdom // Management Science. Vol. 58. № 9. Р. 1669-1681.
Von Hippel E., von Krogh G. (2003) Open source software and the «private-collective» innovation model: Issues for organization science // Organization Science. Vol. 14. № 2. Р. 209-223.
Von Hippel Е. (1988) Lead user analysis for the development of new industrial products // Management Science. Vol. 34. № 5. Р. 569-582.
Von Hippel Е. (1994) Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation // Management Science. Vol. 40. № 4. Р. 429-439.
Wahl M., Prause G. (2013) Toward Understanding Resources, Competencies, and Capabilities: Business Model Generation Approach // Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. Vol. 1. № 2. Р. 67-79.
Zahay D., Griffin A., Fredericks E. (2011) Information use in new product development: An initial exploratory empirical investigation in the chemical industry // Journal of Product Innovation Management. Vol. 28. P. 485-502.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.