Abstract
Emerging disruptive technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) are fueling global rivalry by changing the power dynamics among countries. This article examines the implications of AI for the prospects of defense competition between major powers such as the United States and China. It presents possible scenarios of such competition through 2050 and their implications for smaller countries with limited geopolitical influence as they adapt to the increasingly complex context these processes create. The scenarios provide not only structured pictures of possible futures but also a strategic canvas for developing proactive national security policies in the changing international landscape. In the context of rapid technological advances and strategic competition, smaller countries face both challenges and opportunities as they navigate their own paths. The proposed recommendations aim to “level the playing field” and help such states not only address the challenges posed by AI in the military sphere but also seize the opportunities arising from technological shifts. The findings presented can serve as a basis for developing national security strategies even in the context of institutional and infrastructural limitations. Decision makers will be able to navigate and effectively act in a complex, changing arena, the dynamism of which is largely determined by AI technologies.
References
Boulanin V., Saalman L., Topychkanov P., Su F., Carlsson M.P. (2020) Artificial Intelligence, Strategic Stability, and Nuclear Risk, Stockholm: Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.
Cheung T.M. (2022) Innovate to Dominate the Rise of the Chinese Techno-Security State, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
De Jouvenel B. (1964) L’art de la conjecture, Monaco: Ed du Rocher.
Fernández-Montesinos F. (2019) La inteligencia artificial como factor geopolítico, Madrid: Instituto Español de Estudios Estratégicos.
Gardner N. (2021) Clausewitzian Friction and Autonomous Weapon Systems. Comparative Strategy, 40(1), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2021.1853442
Godet M. (1994) From Anticipation to Action: A Handbook of Strategic Prospective, Paris: UNESCO.
Godet M., Durance P. (2011) Strategic foresight: For corporate and regional development, Paris: UNESCO.
He T., Ji Y. (2023) China’s Techno-Economic Statecraft Amid US-China Strategic Rivalry: AI and the “New Whole-State System”. Orbis, 67(4), 605–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2023.08.008
Horowitz M., Kania E.B., Allen G.C., Scharre P. (2018) Strategic Competition in an Era of Artificial Intelligence. Washington, D.C: Center for a New American Security (CNAS).
Horowitz M., Kahn L., Mahoney C. (2020) The Future of Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: A Role for Confidence-Building Measures? Orbis, 64(4), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orbis.2020.08.003
Hunter L.Y., Albert C.D., Henningan C., Rutland J. (2023) The military application of artificial intelligence technology in the United States, China, and Russia and the implications for global security. Defense & Security Analysis, 39(2), 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2023.2210367.
Johnson J. (2019) Artificial intelligence and future warfare: Implications for international security. Defense & Security Analysis, 35(2), 147–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2019.1600800
Johnson J. (2020) Artificial Intelligence in Future Hyper-Warfare: A Perfect Storm of Instability? The Washington Quarterly, 43(2), 197–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2020.1770968
Johnson J. (2021) Artificial intelligence and the future of warfare: The USA, China, and strategic stability, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Larson E. (2021) The Myth of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Lu S.-M. (2021) The CCP’s Development of Artificial Intelligence: Impact on Future Operations. Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 4(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.04.01.255
Malmio I. (2023) Ethics as an enabler and a constraint – Narratives on technology development and artificial intelligence in military affairs through the case of Project Maven. Technology in Society, 72, 102193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102193
Mearsheimer J. (2014) The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York: Norton & Company.
Mojica F.J. (2005) La Construcción del futuro: Concepto y modelo de prospectica estratégica, territorial y tecnológica, Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
Morgan F.E., Boudreaux B., Lohn A.J., Ashby M., Curriden C., Klima K., Grossman D. (2020) Military Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Ethical Concerns in an Uncertain World, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Morgenthau H. (2005) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace (7th ed.), New York: McGraw Hill Education.
Mori S. (2018) US Defense Innovation and Artificial Intelligence. Asia-Pacific Review, 25(2), 16–44.
Payne K., Warbot I. (2021) The Dawn of Artificially Intelligent Conflict, New York: Oxford University Press.
PWC (2017) Sizing the prize: What’s the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalise?, London: PWC.
Schwartz P. (1997) The Art of the Long View: Planning For the Future in an Uncertain World, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Tsoukas H.T., Shepherd J. (2004) Coping with the future: Developing organizational foresightfulness. Futures, 36(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(03)00146-0
Velázquez R., González S. (2016) El realismo clásico. In: Teorías de las Relaciones Internacionales en el siglo XXI: Interpretaciones criticas desde Mexico (eds. J.A. Schiavon Uriegas, A.S. Ortega Ramírez, M. López-Vallejo Olvera, R. Velázquez Flores), México: AMEI, pp. 285–295.
Viglione G. (2020) China is closing gap with United States on research spending. Nature News, 15.01.2020. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-00084-7
Waltz K. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Whitehead A. (1967) Modes of Thought, New York: MacMillan Company.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.