Evaluating the Impact of Inward FDI & Economic Growth Upon the Carbon Emissions of South Korea
PDF Рус (Русский)

Keywords

foreign direct investment
economic growth
carbon neutrality
South Korea

How to Cite

NavazF., KayaniU., FahleviM., Luqman AzizA., & JungT. (2025). Evaluating the Impact of Inward FDI & Economic Growth Upon the Carbon Emissions of South Korea. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(3). Retrieved from https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/27981

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the impact of inward foreign direct investment (FDI) and economic growth on carbon emissions in South Korea, a nation committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050. Given the dual role of inward FDI and economic growth in fostering economic development and potentially increasing carbon emissions, this study explored the complex relationships among these variables. This study uses annual time-series data from 1990 to 2021, including carbon emissions (CO₂) as the dependent variable and GDP, inward FDI, and renewable energy consumption as explanatory variables. An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) bounds test was employed to assess the long-term relationships between these variables. The empirical analysis confirms the long-run relationship among FDI, economic growth, renewable energy use, and carbon emissions in South Korea. This finding underscores the necessity of integrating sustainable investment practices and renewable energy solutions to mitigate the environmental impact of economic growth and FDI. Unlike previous studies, this study uniquely combines the effects of FDI, GDP, and renewable energy on carbon emissions within the context of South Korea’s ambitious carbon neutrality commitment by 2050. Applying a robust ARDL model provides nuanced insights into the interactions between economic factors and sustainability efforts, offering actionable data to policymakers aiming to balance economic and environmental goals. These results highlight the importance of sustainable policies that balance economic growth and environmental preservation, especially in the context of South Korea’s carbon neutrality goals.

PDF Рус (Русский)

References

Apergis N., Alam M.S., Paramati S.R., Fang J. (2020) The impacts of R&D investment and stock markets on clean energy uses and CO2 emissions in a panel of OECD economies. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 26(4), 4979–4992. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2049

Aslam B., Hu J., Ali S., AlGarni T.S., Abdullah M.A. (2022) Malaysia’s economic growth, consumption of oil, industry and CO2 emissions: Evidence from the ARDL model. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 19, 3189–3200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03279-1

Aysan A., Kayani F., Kayani U.N. (2020) The Chinese inward FDI and economic prospects amid COVID-19 crisis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 14(4), 1088–1105.

Bekun F.V., Gyamfi B.A., Onifade S.T., Agboola M.O. (2021) Beyond the environmental Kuznets Curve in E7 economies: accounting for the combined impacts of institutional quality and renewables. Journal of Cleaner Production, 314, 127924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127924

Bhasin N., Garg S. (2020) Impact of institutional environment on inward FDI: A case of select emerging market economies. Global Business Review, 21(5), 1279–1301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919856989

Cai L., Firdousi S.F., Li C., Luo Y. (2021) Inward foreign direct investment, outward foreign direct investment, and carbon dioxide emission intensity-threshold regression analysis based on interprovincial panel data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 46147–46160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11909-3

Cao W., Chen S., Huang Z. (2020) Does foreign direct investment impact energy intensity? Evidence from developing countries. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020(1), 5695684. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5695684

Choo H., Kim Y.G., Kim D. (2024) Power sector carbon reduction review for South Korea in 2030. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 196, 114348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114348

De Vita G., Li C., Luo Y. (2021) The inward FDI-Energy intensity nexus in OECD countries: A sectoral R&D threshold analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 287, 112290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112290

Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2286348

Guzel A.E., Okumus İ. (2020) Revisiting the pollution haven hypothesis in ASEAN-5 countries: New insights from panel data analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 18157–18167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08317-y

Habiba U., Xinbang C., Ahmad R.I. (2021) The influence of stock market and financial institution development on carbon emissions with the importance of renewable energy consumption and foreign direct investment in G20 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 67677–67688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15321-3

Hao Y., Guo Y., Wu H., Ren S. (2020) Does outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) affect the home country’s environmental quality? The case of China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.08.012

He Y., Li X., Huang P., Wang J. (2022) Exploring the road toward environmental sustainability: Natural resources, renewable energy consumption, economic growth, and greenhouse gas emissions. Sustainability, 14(3), 1579. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031579

Holmes J.V. (2022) Daegu’s Convention Legacies are contributing to Climate Change Solutions. International Journal of Business Events and Legacies, 1(1), 92–98.

Holtz-Eakin D., Selden T.M. (1995) Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 57(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(94)01449-X

Hussain I., Rehman A. (2021) Exploring the dynamic interaction of CO2 emission on population growth, foreign investment, and renewable energy by employing ARDL bounds testing approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 39387–39397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13502-8

Kayani F.N, Nasim I., Abu Saleem K. (2024) Analyzing the Impact of Governance, Environment and Trade on Inward FDI: A Case of Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam from ASEAN. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 14(2), 423–534. http://dx.doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.15486

Kayani F.N., Sadiq M. (2022) Analyzing the impact of inward FDI and economic growth on CO2 emissions of Ukraine. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 12(5), 202–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13395

Kayani F.N. (2021) Renewable Energy and Economic Growth Nexus: A Case of United Arab Emirates. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(5), 504–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.11559

Khan Y., Hassan T., Kirikkaleli D., Xiuqin Z., Shukai C. (2022) The impact of economic policy uncertainty on carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of foreign capital investment and renewable energy in East Asian economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 18527–18545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17000-9

Lamb W.F., Wiedmann T., Pongratz J., Andrew R., Crippa M., Olivier J.G., Minx J. (2021) A review of trends and drivers of greenhouse gas emissions by sector from 1990 to 2018. Environmental Research Letters, 16(7), 073005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abee4e

Lee J.H., Woo J. (2020) Green new deal policy of South Korea: Policy innovation for a sustainability transition. Sustainability, 12(23), 10191. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310191

Kartal M.T., Pata U.K., Alola A.A. (2024) Renewable electricity generation and carbon emissions in leading European countries: Daily-based disaggregate evidence by nonlinear approaches. Energy Strategy Reviews, 101300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101300

Kartal M.T., Erdogan S., Alola A.A., Pata U.K. (2023) Impact of renewable energy investments in curbing sectoral CO2 emissions: Evidence from China by nonlinear quantile approaches. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 112673–112685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30282-5

Musa M., Gao Y., Rahman P., Albattat A., Ali M.A.S., Saha S.K. (2024) Sustainable development challenges in Bangladesh: An empirical study of economic growth, industrialization, energy consumption, foreign investment, and carbon emissions — using dynamic ARDL model and frequency domain causality approach. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26(6), 1799–1823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10098-023-02680-3

Nadeem A.M., Ali T., Khan M.T., Guo Z. (2020) Relationship between inward FDI and environmental degradation for Pakistan: An exploration of pollution haven hypothesis through ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 15407–15425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08083-x

Naseem S., Mohsin M., Zia-UR-Rehman M., Baig S.A., Sarfraz M. (2021) The influence of energy consumption and economic growth on environmental degradation in BRICS countries: An application of the ARDL model and decoupling index. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29, 13042–13055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16533-3

Negash E.S., Zhu W., Lu Y., Wang Z. (2020) Does Chinese inward foreign direct investment improve the productivity of domestic firms? Horizontal linkages and absorptive capacities: Firm-level evidence from Ethiopia. Sustainability, 12(7), 3023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073023

Nur Mozahid M., Akter S., Hafiz Iqbal M. (2022) Causality analysis of CO2 emissions, foreign direct investment, gross domestic product, and energy consumption: Empirical evidence from South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(43), 65684–65698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20362-3

Oh H., Hong I., Oh I. (2021) South Korea’s 2050 carbon neutrality policy. East Asian Policy, 13(01), 33–46.

Sun Y., Zhang M., Zhu Y. (2023) Do Foreign Direct Investment Inflows in the Producer Service Sector Promote Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 15(14), 10904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410904

Tang C.F., Tan B.W. (2015) The Impact of Energy Consumption, Income and Foreign Direct Investment on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Vietnam. Energy, 79, 447–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.033

Udemba E.N., Keleş N.İ. (2022) Interactions among urbanization, industrialization and foreign direct investment (FDI) in determining the environment and sustainable development: New insight from Turkey. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 6(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41685-021-00214-7

Ullah S., Nadeem M., Ali K., Abbas Q. (2022) Fossil fuel, industrial growth and inward FDI impact on CO2 emissions in Vietnam: Testing the EKC hypothesis. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(2), 222–240. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2021-0051

Wang X., Luo Y. (2020) Has technological innovation capability addressed environmental pollution from the dual perspective of FDI quantity and quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120941

Wang M., Ding X., Choi B. (2023) FDI or international-trade-driven green growth of 24 Korean manufacturing industries? Evidence from heterogeneous panel based on non-causality test. Sustainability, 15(7), 5753. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075753

Xie Q., Wang X., Cong X. (2020) How does foreign direct investment affect CO2 emissions in emerging countries? New findings from a nonlinear panel analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, 119422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119422

Zameer H., Shahbaz M., Vo X.V. (2020) Reinforcing poverty alleviation efficiency through technological innovation, globalization, and financial development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120326

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.