Keywords
transformational transitions
capacity building
social innovations
technologies
digital transformation
narratives
new governance models
How to Cite
Abstract
The need to comply with new economic models (Industry 4.0 and 5.0) is driving countries, organizations, and sectors toward technological transformation. The implementation of such large-scale projects requires a certain level of maturity and a special resource base to overcome various obstacles. The article analyzes the key components of specific potential for such initiatives based on the experience of urban transformation, which can serve as a model for other socio-economic systems. Empirical data from Japanese and European cities reveal key patterns that influence the outcomes of the transition. The role of narrative tools in building consensus among all participants is emphasized, without which transformational projects risk adding to the dominant statistics of failures.
The analysis of factors presented in the article enriches our understanding of the specifics of transformational transitions, not so much from the point of view of technological capabilities, but rather from the perspective of contextual and cultural differences and a certain degree of maturity of urban management teams and the population. Its results may be useful for leaders initiating long-term radical transformations in various sectors to transition to sustainability and a new quality of development.
References
Aboagye P.D., Sharifi A. (2023) Post-fifth assessment report urban climate planning: Lessons from 278 urban climate action plans released from 2015 to 2022. Urban Climate, 49, 101550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101550
Aboagye P.D., Sharifi A. (2024) Urban climate adaptation and mitigation action plans: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 189, Part A, 113886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113886
Altunbey P.N., Balta S., Ortaçeşme V., Atik M. (2023) Smart environment practices in Kashiwa-No-Ha (Japan) smart city. Acta Horticulturae et Regiotecturae, 26(2), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.2478/ahr-2023-0018
Bernroider E.W.N., Wong C.W.Y., Lai K.H. (2014) From dynamic capabilities to ERP enabled business improvements: The mediating effect of the implementation project. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 350–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.006
Boyd D., Pathak M., van Diemen R., Skea J. (2022) Mitigation co-benefits of climate change adaptation: A case-study analysis of eight cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103563
Brummer M., Ueno H. (2024) Crisis and choice in digital transformation: COVID-19 and the punctuated politics of government DX in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 46(4), 360–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2282472
Carroll N., Conboy K. (2020) Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102186
Carroll N., Conboy K., Hassan N.R., Hess T., Junglas I., Morgan L. (2023) Problematizing assumptions on digital transformation research in the information systems field. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 53(1), 508–531. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.05322
Chen Y. (2017) Dynamic ambidexterity: How innovators manage exploration and exploitation. Business Horizons, 60(3), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.01.001
City of Rotterdam (2021) Rotterdam in transformation. The convergence of social, physical & digital Rotterdam, Rotterdam: City of Rotterdam.
Custers G., Willems J.J. (2024) Rotterdam in the 21st century: From ‘sick man’ to ‘capital of cool’. Cities, 150, 105009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105009
De Haan F.J., Rotmans J. (2011) Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008
De Haan F.J., Rotmans J. (2018) A proposed theoretical framework for actors in transformative change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 128, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.017
Delmas M.A., Young O. (2009) Governance for the Environment: New Perspectives, Cambridge University Press.
Dentinho T.P. (2011) Unsustainable cities, a tragedy of urban infrastructure. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 3(3), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7802.2011.01039.x
Dijst M., Worrell E., Böcker L., Brunner P., Davoudi S., Geertman S., Harmsen R., Helbich M., Holtslag A.A.M., Kwan M.P., Lenz B., Lyons G., Mokhtarian P.L., Newman P., Perrels A., Ribeiro A.P., Carreón J.R., Thomson G., Urge-Vorsatz D., Zeyringer M. (2018) Exploring urban metabolism — Towards an interdisciplinary perspective. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 132, 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.014
Dobroć P., Bögel P., Upham P. (2023) Narratives of change: Strategies for inclusivity in shaping socio-technical future visions. Futures, 145, 103076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103076
Eidinow E., Ramirez R. (2016) The aesthetics of story-telling as a technology of the plausible. Futures, 84(part A), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.09.005
European Commission (2020) Strategic Foresight Report of the European Commission 2020, Brussels: European Commission.
Feldman S.P. (2000) Micro matters: The aesthetics of power in NASA’s flight readiness review. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 36(4), 474–490.
Fischer R., Ferreira M.C., Assmar E., Redford P., Harb C., Glazer S., Cheng B.-S., Jiang D.-Y., Wong C.C., Kumar N., Kärtner J., Hofer J., Achoui M. (2009) Individualism-collectivism as descriptive norms: Development of a subjective norm approach to culture measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 40(2), 187–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109332738
Fletcher A., Benveniste M. (2025) Narrative Creativity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Florentin K.M., Onuki M., Yarime M. (2024) Facilitating citizen participation in greenfield smart city development: The case of a human-centered approach in Kashiwanoha international campus town. Telematics and Informatics Reports, 15, 100154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teler.2024.100154
Floyd C.F. (1983) Billboards, aesthetics, and the police power. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 42(3), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1536-7150.1983.tb01723.x
Frantzeskaki N., Tilie N. (2014) The Dynamics of Urban Ecosystem Governance in Rotterdam, The Netherlands. AMBIO, 43, 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-014-0512-0
Gobster P.H. (1999) An ecological aesthetic for forest landscape management. Landscape Management, 18(1), 54–64. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43323479
Gornik M. (2020) Smart Governance: Kashiwa-no-ha Smart City in Japan as a model for future urban development?, Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institut für Klima, Umwelt, Energie gGmbH (in German).
Grin J., Rotmans J., Schot J. (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change, New York: Routledge.
Grove A.S. (1999) Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points That Challenge Every Company, New York: Crown Currency.
Hofstede G. (1980) Culture and Organizations. International Studies of Management & Organization, 10(4), 15–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
Hölscher K., Frantzeskaki N. (2021) Transformative Climate Governance - A Capacities Perspective to Systematise, Evaluate and Guide Climate Action, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Holtz G., Alkemade F., de Haan F., Köhler J., Trutnevyte E., Luthe T., Halbe J., Papachristos G., Chappin E., Kwakkel J., Ruutu S. (2015) Prospects of modelling societal transitions: Position paper of an emerging community. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 17, 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.006
Inglehart R., Basanez M., Diez-Medrano J., Halman L., Luijkx R. (2004) (eds.) Human Beliefs and Values: A Cross-Cultural Sourcebook based on the 1999-2002 values surveys, Mexico: Siglo Beintiuno.
Ito H. (2019) Strategies in Promoting Eco-policies: The Case of Toyama City, Japan. Asian Social Science, 15(5), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v15n5p34
Jafari-Sadeghi V., Mahdiraji H.A., Brdesee H., Alsaggaf W. (2022) Decision-making strategy for digital transformation: A two-year analytical study and follow-up concerning innovative improvements in university e-services. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 17(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer17010008
Kang S.-W., Lee M.-S., Jung J.-C. (2024) Analysis of sustainable urban forms for climate change adaptation and mitigation. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 22, 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100337
Krznaric R. (2020) The Good Ancestor. How to Think Long Term in a Short-Term World, London: W.H. Allen.
Lönngren J., van Poeck K. (2020) Wicked problems: A mapping review of the literature. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 28(6), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2020.1859415
Loorbach D., Rotmans J. (2010) The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures, 42(3), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.009
Loorbach D., Schwanen T., Doody B.J., Arnfalk P., Langeland O., Farstad E. (2021) Transition governance for just, sustainable urban mobility: An experimental approach from Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Urban Mobility, 1, 100009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100009
Loorbach D., Shiroyama H. (2016) The Challenge of Sustainable Urban Development and Transforming Cities. In: Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions (eds. D. Loorbach, J. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, S. Mizuguchi), Tokyo: Springer, pp. 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_1
Loorbach D., Wittmayer J., Avelino F., von Wirth T., Frantzeskaki N. (2020) Transformative innovation and translocal diffusion. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 35, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.01.009
Loorbach D.A., Wittmayer J. (2024) Transforming universities. Sustainability Science, 19, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01335-y
McKelvey B. (1999) Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes. Organization Science, 10(3), 294–321. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2640333
McKelvey B. (2010) Complexity leadership: The secret of Jack Welch's success. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 1, 4–36. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCLM.2010.035788
Mizuguchi S., Ohta K., Beers P.J., Yamaguchi M., Nishimura T. (2016) Interactions Among Multiple Niche-Innovations and Multi-regimes: The Case of the “Welfare Mall”. In: Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions (eds. D. Loorbach, J. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, S. Mizuguchi), Tokyo: Springer, pp. 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_5
Molenaar A., Hölscher K., Loorbach D., Verlinde J. (2021) Making the Transition: Transformative Governance Capacities for a Resilient Rotterdam. In: Climate Resilient Urban Areas (ed. R. de Graaf-van Dinther), Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57537-3_9
Moulaert F., Sekia F. (2003) Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442
Noordegraaf M., Vermeulen J. (2010) Culture in Action: The ‘Rotterdam Approach’ as Modernization through Tradition. Public Administration, 88(2), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01810.x
Oludapo S., Carroll N., Helfert M. (2024) Why do so many digital transformations fail? A bibliometric analysis and future research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 174, 114528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114528
Ramirez R. (1996) Wrapping form and organisational beauty. Organisation, 3(2), 233–242.
Ramírez R., Arvidsson N. (2005) The aesthetics of business innovation: An exploratory distinction of two archetypes. Innovation: Management, Policy, and Practice, 7(4), 373–388.
Rappleye J., Silova I., Komatsu H., Takayama K. (2024) A radical proposal: Evidence-based SDG 4 discussions. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102930.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102930
Roemer С., Rundle-Thiele S., McHugh P. (2025) Designing solutions to challenging the status quo – a multi-stakeholder approach. Journal of Social Marketing, 15(23), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSOCM-04-2023-0095
Roorda C., Buiter M., Rotmans J., Bentvelzen M., Tillie N., Keeton R. (2011) Urban Development: The State of the Sustainable Art, an international benchmark of sustainable urban development, Rotterdam: Erasmus University.
Roorda C., Wittmayer J. (2014) Transition management in five European cities – an evaluation, Rotterdam: University of Rotterdam.
Roorda C., Wittmayer J., van Steenbergen F., Frantzeskaki N., Loorbach D., Henneman P. (2014) Transition Management In Urban Context – guidance manual, Rotterdam: Erasmus
Ross J.W., Beath C.M., Mocker M. (2019) Designed for digital: How to architect your business for sustained success, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/MITPRESS/12188.001.0001
Sattler J. (ed.) (2016) Urban Transformations in the U.S.A., Ruhr: Mercator Research Center Ruhr.
Schwartz S.H. (1994) Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In: Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (eds. U. Kim, H.C. Triandis, Ç. Kâğitçibaşi, S.-C. Choi, G. Yoon), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 85–119.
Selin C. (2011) Negotiating plausibility: Intervening in the future of nanotechnology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(4), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9315-x
Selin C., Pereira A. (2013) Pursuing plausibility. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 9 (2/3/4), 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2013.058616
Shiroyama H., Kajiki S. (2016) Case Study of Eco-town Project in Kitakyushu: Tension Among Incumbents and the Transition from Industrial City to Green City. In: Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions (eds. D. Loorbach, J. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, S. Mizuguchi), Tokyo: Springer, pp. 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_7
Silova I., Rappleye J., You Y. (2020) Beyond the Western Horizon in Educational Research: Toward a Deeper Dialogue About Our Interdependent Futures. ECNU Review of Education, 3(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120905195 (Original work published 2020)
Stacey R.D. (1995) The Science of Complexity: An Alternative Perspective for Strategic Change Processes. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 477-495. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250160606
Van der Brugge R., de Graaf R. (2010) Linking water policy innovation and urban renewal: the case of Rotterdam, The Netherlands Available to Purchase. Water Policy (2010) 12 (3): 381–400.https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2010.037
Van der Brugge R., Rotmans J., Loorbach D. (2005) The transition in Dutch water management. Regional Environmental Change, 5(4), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-004-0086-7
Van der Heijden K. (2005) Scenarios. The art of strategic conversation (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.
Vial G. (2019) Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSIS.2019.01.003
Wals A.E.J. (2025) On Cotonomy and Eco-Bildung as a Relational Transitional Pathway Toward Post-sustainability. In: Handbook of Ecological Civilization (eds. M.A. Peters, B.J. Green, G.W. Misiaszek, , X. Zhu), Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-8101-0_8-1
Warhurst C., Nickson D.P., Witz A., Cullen A.M. (2000) Aesthetic labour in interactive service work: Some case study evidence from the “new” Glasgow. The Service Industries Journal, 20(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642060000000029
Weick K. (1995) Sensemaking in organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wilkinson A., Ramirez R. (2016) Strategic reframing. The Oxford scenario planning approach, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wittmayer J.M., Loorbach D. (2016) Governing Transitions in Cities: Fostering Alternative Ideas, Practices, and Social Relations through Transition Management. In: Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Theory and Practice of Urban Sustainability Transitions (eds. D. Loorbach, J. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, S. Mizuguchi), Tokyo: Springer, pp. 13–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4_2
World Bank (2020) Development Knowledge of Toyama City, Washington, D.C.: World Bank Group.
Xie H., Li H., Zhang K. (2025) Research on evaluation of knowledge interaction indicators in multi-team systems based on management entropy. Technovation, 139, 103125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103125
Yin R.K. (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.