Bridging Academia and Industry: Global Practices of Industrial PhD Programs and Pathways for Russian Adaptation
PDF

Keywords

industrial PhD programmes
university-industry cooperation
career trajectories
knowledge and technology transfer
interdisciplinary skills

How to Cite

NefedovaA., MarininaE., AntonovaE., & ChamechA. A. (2025). Bridging Academia and Industry: Global Practices of Industrial PhD Programs and Pathways for Russian Adaptation. Foresight and STI Governance, 20(1). Retrieved from https://foresight-journal.hse.ru/article/view/30107

Abstract

In the context of intensifying global technological competition and the imperative of achieving scientific and technological sovereignty for the Russian Federation, the exploration of novel formats for training highly qualified personnel assumes critical significance. One promising trajectory in this domain is the Industrial PhD — a framework designed to conduct research in the service of industrial needs, with active collaboration between universities and business, underpinned by state support. This model offers a means to bridge the institutional divide between academic research and the applied challenges of the real economy, thereby fostering knowledge transfer and enhancing the innovation capacities of enterprises.

This article provides a comprehensive overview of international experiences with Industrial PhD programmes, drawing on an analysis of over sixty programmes across nineteen countries. We synthesise a range of organisational and financial models, and identify institutional preconditions essential for the sustainability of such programmes: tripartite agreements among the university, the industrial partner, and the doctoral candidate; mechanisms of co-funding; systems of dual academic supervision; and flexible arrangements governing intellectual property. Particular attention is devoted to mapping the barriers and challenges encountered by programme participants — such as divergent goal-setting between academic and corporate sectors, conflicting expectations, administrative burdens, and risks to academic autonomy.

Furthermore, the article outlines potential pathways for adapting the Industrial PhD model in the Russian context. Key conditions for successful implementation are examined: the launch of pilot initiatives at leading technical universities; the development of a robust legal framework to support tripartite interaction; and the institutionalisation of state support mechanisms.

 

This article is a part of the special issue “Transforming Education in the 21st Century: Foresight and Sustainable Development”
Guest Editors: Asad Abbas (Writing Lab, Institute for the Future of Education, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico), Ahsan Ali (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China), Jose Luis Martin-Nuñez (Instituto de Ciencias de la Educación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain), Mehul Mahrishi (Swami Keshvanand Institute of Technology, Management & Gramothan, Jaipur, India)

PDF

References

Бедный Б.И., Рыбаков Н.В., Ходеева Н.А. (2021) Практико-ориентированные аспирантские программы и профессиональные степени: анализ зарубежного опыта. Университетское управление: практика и анализ, 25(3), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.15826/umpa.2021.03.028
Бекова С.К. (2022) Совмещение учебы в университете и работы: от бакалавриата до аспирантуры (Мониторинг экономики образования, 22(39)), М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
Жучкова С.В., Нефедова А.И., Терентьев Е.А., Смирнов Н.М. (2025) Барьеры при подготовке диссертаций в российской аспирантуре, М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
Нефедова А.И (2024) Вариативные модели аспирантур. https://issek.hse.ru/news/917705549.html, дата обращения 17.10.2025.
Симачев Ю.В., Кузык М.Г., Фейгина В.В. (2014) Взаимодействие российских компаний и исследовательских организаций в проведении НИОКР: третий не лишний? Вопросы экономики, 7, 4–34. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-7-4-34
Abu Sa'a E., Yström A. (2024) Exploring enablers of internal knowledge dissemination for boundary‐spanning industrial PhD students. Creativity and Innovation Management, 33(3), 530–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12596
Ayers N.L., Kiley M., Jones N., McDermott M.L., Hawkins M. (2018) Using learning plans to support doctoral candidates. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(3), 248–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1233074
Backlund F. (2017) A project perspective on doctoral studies – A student point of view. International Journal of Educational Management, 31(7), 908–921. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-04-2016-0075
Bell S., Morse S. (2007) Story telling in sustainable development projects. Sustainable Development, 15(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.305
Bernhard I. Olsson A.K. (2023) One foot in academia and one in work-life – The case of Swedish industrial PhD students. Journal of Workplace Learning, 35(6), 506–523. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-11-2022-0157
Bernhard I., Olsson A.K. (2020) University-industry collaboration in higher education: Exploring the informing flows framework in industrial PhD education. Informing Science, 23, 147–163. https://doi.org/10.28945/4672
Borrell-Damian L., Brown T., Dearing A., Font J., Hagen S., Metcalfe J., Smith J. (2010) Collaborative doctoral education: University-industry partnerships for enhancing knowledge exchange. Higher Education Policy, 23, 493–514. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2010.20
Bramwell A., Wolfe D.A. (2008) Universities and regional economic development: The entrepreneurial University of Waterloo. Research Policy, 37(8), 1175–1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.04.016
Bröchner J., Sezer A.A. (2020) Effects of construction industry support for PhD projects: The case of a Swedish scheme. Industry and Higher Education, 34(6), 391–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422220904932
Caley L., Williams S.J., Spernaes I., Thomas D., Behrens D., Willson A. (2021) Frameworks for evaluating education programmes and work-related learning: A scoping review. Journal of Workplace Learning, 33(6), 486–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWL-09-2020-0157
Coghlan D. (2007) Insider action research: Opportunities and challenges. Management Research News, 30(5), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170710746337
Compagnucci L., Spigarelli F. (2024) Industrial doctorates: A systematic literature reviewand future research agenda. Studies in Higher Education, 50(6), 1076–1103. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2362407
Cumming J. (2010) Doctoral enterprise: A holistic conception of evolving practices and arrangements. Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070902825899
Enoiu E.P. (2019) An Empirical Exploration on the Supervision of PhD Students Closely Collaborating with Industry (arXiv preprint 1903.12075). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1903.12075
Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (1997) Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations, London: Pinter.
Grimm K. (2018) Assessing the industrial PhD: Stakeholder insights. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 214. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.320
Hnatkova E., Degtyarova I., Kersschot M., Boman J. (2022) Labour market perspectives for PhD graduates in Europe. European Journal of Education, 57, 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12514
Jung J. (2018) Learning experience and perceived competencies of doctoral students in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Education Review, 19, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-018-9530-0
Katz R., Allen T.J. (1982) Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1982.tb00478.x
Kolmos A., Kofoed L.B., Du X.Y. (2008) PhD students’ work conditions and study environment in university-and industry-based PhD programmes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(5–6), 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790802588383
Kyvik S., Olsen T.B. (2012) The relevance of doctoral training in different labour markets. Journal of Education and Work, 25(2), 205–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080.2010.538376
Leydesdorff L., Meyer M. (2013) Triple Helix of university– industry–government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2),191–203. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026276308287
Malfroy J. (2011) The impact of university–industry research on doctoral programs and practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 571–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.594594
Martinsuo M., Turkulainen V. (2011) Personal commitment, support and progress in doctoral studies. Studies in Higher Education, 36(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903469598
Moghadam-Saman S. (2020) Collaboration of doctoral researchers with industry: A critical realist theorization. Industry and Higher Education, 34(1), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219865098
O’Carroll C., Purser L., Wislocka M., Lucey S., McGuinness N. (2012) The PhD in Europe: Developing a system of doctoral training that will increase the internationalisation of universities. In: European higher education at the crossroads: Between the Bologna process and national reforms (eds. A. Curaj, P. Scott, L. Vlasceanu, L. Wilson), Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, pp. 461–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3937-6_26
OECD (2012) Transferable Skills Training for Researchers: Supporting Career Development and Research, Paris: OECD.
Olsson A.K., Bernhard I. (2023) Transforming doctoral education: Exploring industrial PhD collaboration in Sweden. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 24(4), 523–536.
Passaretta G., Trivellato P., Triventi M. (2018) Between academia and labour market — The occupational outcomes of PhD graduates in a period of academic reforms and economic crisis. Higher Education, 77, 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0288-4
Pham T. (2025) What really contributes to employability of PhD graduates in uncertain labour markets? Globalisation, Societies and Education, 23(2), 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2023.2192908
Plantec Q., Cabanes B., Le Masson P., Weil B. (2023) Early-career academic engagement in university–industry collaborative PhDs: Research orientation and project performance. Research Policy, 52(9), 104856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104856
Roolaht T. (2015) Enhancing the industrial PhD programme as a policy tool for university—industry cooperation. Industry and Higher Education, 29(4), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2015.0259
Salimi N., Bekkers R., Frenken K. (2016) Success factors in university–industry PhD projects. Science and Public Policy, 43(6), 812–830. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv076
Shin J.C., Kehm B.M., Jones G.A. (eds.) (2018) Doctoral Education for the Knowledge Society: Convergence or Divergence in National Approaches?, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89713-4
Sin C., Soares D., Tavares O. (2021) Coursework in industrial doctorates: A worthwhile contribution to students’ training? Higher Education Research & Development, 40(6), 1298–1312. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1807918
Sinche M., Layton R., Brandt P., O’Connell A., Hall J., Cook J., Brennwald P. (2017) An evidence-based evaluation of transferrable skills and job satisfaction for science PhDs. PLOS One, 12(9), e0185023. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0185023
Sundström A., Widforssab G., Rosqvistab M., Hallin A. (2016) Industrial PhD Students and their Projects. Procedia Computer Science, 100, 739–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.09.219
Tavares O., Soares D., Sin C. (2020) Industry–university collaboration in industrial doctorates: A trouble-free marriage? Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422219900155
Thune T., Børing P. (2015) Industry PhD schemes: Developing innovation competencies in firms? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-014-0214-7
Valentin V., Shane J.S. (2014) Advantages and challenges of research programs with extensive industry involvement. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 19(1), 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000204
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.