Looking Within the Ivory Tower: How Research Groups’ Characteristics Affect Industrial Innovation
PDF rus (Русский)
PDF

Keywords

university-industry collaboration
university-industry interaction
industrial firms
capabilities
innovation

How to Cite

SottM. K., MikhailovA., TrezJ. R., Tello-GamarraJ., & FischerB. (2026). Looking Within the Ivory Tower: How Research Groups’ Characteristics Affect Industrial Innovation. Foresight and STI Governance, 20(3), 39188. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2026.39188

Abstract

Numerous studies have examined innovative partnerships between universities and industrial companies; however, universities are typically treated as a monolithic unit of analysis. Shifting the focus to individual academic research groups (RGs) provides a better understanding of the complexity and heterogeneity of such interactions. This article aims to analyze the interactions between Brazilian industrial firms and university research groups to understand how specific characteristics of these micro-level units influence firms' innovative outcomes. The research utilizes data from the Brazilian national census of research groups (DGP-CNPq) combined with a survey of industrial firms that collaborated with these groups. The study develops five econometric models to measure the effects of firm and research group characteristics on the dimensions of innovation performance, such as technological and business capabilities, and product and process innovation. The results indicate that research group characteristics do not directly affect a firm’s innovation performance. Instead, the presence of a robust knowledge infrastructure and involvement in R&D departments are the primary determinants of enhanced technological and business capabilities in collaborative agreements. Furthermore, while applied science is a significant predictor for product innovation, process innovation is primarily driven by the firm's own technological intensity and the university’s knowledge infrastructure. This study is among the first to provide a granular, micro-level analysis of how research group characteristics — rather than university-wide traits — shape the tangible benefits firms derive from collaboration, specifically within the context of an emerging economy.

https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2026.39188
PDF rus (Русский)
PDF

References

Adegbile A.S., Sarpong D., Kolade O. (2021) Environments for Joint University-Industry Laboratories (JUIL): Micro-level dimensions and research implications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120888

Ahn S., Kim K.S., Lee K.H. (2022) Technological capabilities, entrepreneurship and innovation of technology-based start-ups: The resource-based view. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(3), 156. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030156

Aliasghar O., Rose E.L., Asakawa K. (2022) Sources of knowledge and process innovation: The moderating role of perceived competitive intensity. International Business Review, 31(2), 101920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101920

Alpaydın U.A.R., Fitjar R.D. (2021) Proximity across the distant worlds of university–industry collaborations. Papers in Regional Science, 100(3), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12586

Alpaydın U.A.R., Fitjar R.D. (2024) How do university‐industry collaborations benefit innovation? Direct and indirect outcomes of different collaboration types. Growth and Change, 55(2), e12721. https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12721

Arant W., Fornahl D., Grashof N., Hesse K., Söllner C. (2019) University-industry collaborations — The key to radical innovations. Review of Regional Research, 39, 119–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10037-019-00133-3

Baba Y., Shichijo N., Sedita S.R. (2009) How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the advanced materials field. Research Policy, 38(5), 756–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.006

Bell M., Pavitt K. (1995) The development of technological capabilities. In: The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (eds. I. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery, R.R. Nelson), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 69–101.

Bruneel J., d’Este P., Salter A. (2010) Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006

Chai S., Shih W. (2016) Bridging science and technology through academic–industry partnerships. Research Policy, 45(1), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.07.007

Cohen M., Fernandes G., Godinho P. (2025) Measuring the impacts of university-industry R&D collaborations: a systematic literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 50(1), 345–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10114-5

Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A. (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553

Costa J., Neves A.R., Reis J. (2021) Two sides of the same coin. University-industry collaboration and open innovation as enhancers of firm performance. Sustainability, 13(7), 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073866

Crespi G., d’Este P., Fontana R., Geuna A. (2011) The impact of academic patenting on university research and its transfer. Research Policy, 40(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.010

Crespi G., Fernández-Arias E., Stein E. (2014) Rethinking productive development. In: Rethinking Productive Development: Sound Policies and Institutions for Economic Transformation (eds. G. Crespi, E. Fernández-Arias, E. Stein), New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 3–31.

D’Este P., Patel P. (2007) University-Industry Linkages in the UK: What Are the Factors Underlying the Variety of Interactions with Industry? Research Policy, 36, 1295–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.05.002

Dain M.A., Merminod V. (2014) A knowledge sharing framework for black, grey and white box supplier configurations in new product development. Technovation, 34(11), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.005.

Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000) The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4

Fischer B.B., Schaeffer P.R., Vonortas N.S. (2019) Evolution of university-industry collaboration in Brazil from a technology upgrading perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.001

Fischer B.B., Schaeffer P.R., Vonortas N.S., Queiroz S. (2018) Quality comes first: University-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9568-x

Giunta A., Pierucci E., Vurchio D. (2025) University–industry interaction and firms’ innovation performance: New evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Journal of Technology Transfer (ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10275-x

Hailu A.T. (2024) The role of university–industry linkages in promoting technology transfer: Implementation of triple helix model relations. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-024-00370-y

Hu X., Tang Y., Motohashi K. (2021) Varied university-industry knowledge transfer channels and product innovation performance in Guangdong manufacturing firms. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(2), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1747367

Kobarg S., Stumpf-Wollersheim J., Welpe I.M. (2018) University-industry collaborations and product innovation performance: The moderating effects of absorptive capacity and innovation competencies. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(6), 1696–1724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9583-y

Květoň V., Novotný J., Blažek J., Marek D. (2022) The role of geographic and cognitive proximity in knowledge networks: The case of joint R&D projects. Papers in Regional Science, 101(2), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12656

Laaksonen O., Peltoniemi M. (2018) The essence of dynamic capabilities and their measurement. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12122

Laursen K., Salter A. (2004) Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004

Laursen K., Salter A. (2006) Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.507

Lee C.Y., Wu H.L., Pao H.W. (2014) How does R&D intensity influence firm explorativeness? Evidence of R&D active firms in four advanced countries. Technovation, 34(10), 582–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.05.003

Lee K., Malerba F. (2017) Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 46(2), 338–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006

Li T., Du D. (2025) Cross-border R&D, absorptive capacity and innovation performance. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 73, 460–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2025.02.010

Mascarenhas C., Mendes T., Galvão A.R., Marques C.S., Ferreira J.J. (2024) Academic researchers’ motivations to engage in university–industry collaboration in cross-border regions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 49(6), 2104–2134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-024-10082-w

Mikhailov A., Puffal D., Santini M. (2020) University-industry relations and industrial innovation: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 15(3), 6–16. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242020000300006

Najafi-Tavani S., Najafi-Tavani Z., Naudé P., Oghazi P., Zeynaloo E. (2018) How collaborative innovation networks affect new product performance: Product innovation capability, process innovation capability, and absorptive capacity. Industrial Marketing Management, 73, 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.02.009

Nam D., Lee J., Lee H. (2019) Business analytics adoption process: An innovation diffusion perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 411–423. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.07.017

Nugent A., Chan H.F., Dulleck U. (2022) Government funding of university-industry collaboration: Exploring the impact of targeted funding on university patent activity. Scientometrics, 127(1), 29–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04153-0

Öcalan-Özel S., Llerena P. (2021) Industry Collaborations of Research Teams: Are They Penalized or Rewarded in the Grant Evaluation Process? Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 6, 707278. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2021.707278

Odei S.A., Stejskal J. (2019) Do firms R&D collaborations with the science system and enterprise group partners stimulate their product and process innovations? Economies, 7(2), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies7020043

OECD (2018) Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation (4th ed.), Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en

Perkmann M., Tartari V., McKelvey M., Autio E., Broström A., d’Este P., Fini R., Geuna A., Grimaldi R., Hughes A., Krabel S., Kitson M., Llerena P., Lissoni F., Salter A., Sobrero M. (2013) Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007

Puffal D.P., Ruffoni J., Spricigo G. (2021) Empirical evidence for Brazilian firms in terms of university–industry interaction, public funding and innovation outcome. International Journal of Innovation Management, 25(4), 2150040. https://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1363919621500407

Rådberg K.K., Löfsten H. (2023) Developing a knowledge ecosystem for large-scale research infrastructure. Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(1), 441–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09945-x

Rasmussen E., Mosey S., Wright M. (2014) The influence of university departments on the evolution of entrepreneurial competencies in spin-off ventures. Research Policy, 43(1), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.007

Reichert F.M., Zawislak P.A., Arundel A. (2016) Exploring innovation success recipes in low-technology firms using fuzzy-set QCA. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5437–5441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.151

Robertson J., McCarthy I.P., Pitt L. (2019) Leveraging social capital in university-industry knowledge transfer strategies: A comparative positioning framework. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(4), 461–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2019.1589396

Robin S., Schubert T. (2013) Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.002

Rossoni A.L., de Vasconcellos E.P.G., de Castilho Rossoni R.L. (2024) Barriers and facilitators of university-industry collaboration for research, development and innovation: A systematic review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(3), 1841–1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00349-1

Rybnicek R., Königsgruber R. (2019) What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Business Economics, 89(2), 221–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6

Shih T.Y. (2018) Determinants of enterprises radical innovation and performance: Insights into strategic orientation of cultural and creative enterprises. Sustainability, 10(6), 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061871

Tzavidas E., Enevoldsen P., Xydis G. (2020) A University-industry knowledge transfer online education approach via a cloud-based database global solution. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-020-00128-5

Weerasinghe R.N., Jayawardane A.K.W., Huang Q. (2024) Critical inquiry on National Innovation System: Does NIS fit with developing countries? Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(1), 100052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2023.100052

Zawislak P.A., Cherubini Alves A., Tello-Gamarra J., Barbieux D., Reichert F.M. (2012) Innovation capability: From technology development to transaction capability. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(2), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000200002

Zhang J.A., O'Kane C., Bai T. (2024) How do university-firm interactions affect firm innovation speed? The case of Chinese science-intensive SMEs. Research Policy, 53(7), 105027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105027

Zhu W., Han W., Lu R., Lei J. (2025) The impact of enterprises’ scientific capabilities on innovation performance: evidence from an empirical analysis and simulation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04808-w

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.