Abstract
This paper introduces the Hundred and Fifty Shades of Green Playbook – an evidence-based, foresight-driven instrument for assessing and managing Sustainable Innovation (SI). Building on the CASI Project (2014–2017) and its successor applications in the BOLERO Project (2022–2025), with further implementation in the CASI-BIO project (2026–2030), the Playbook proposes a sequenced, action-oriented approach for multi-actor collaboration. It integrates stakeholder engagement, critical-issues analysis, and foresight-based planning into ten interlinked governance aspects encompassing 150 meta-tasks that guide sustainability-oriented decision-making across government, business, academia, and civil society. The BOLERO experience, particularly the MOBBI service innovation in Lombardy, exemplifies the framework’s transferability from EU-level to regional implementation, demonstrating its adaptability to diverse institutional and socio-economic contexts. Reflecting a decade of progress in the governance and management of sustainable innovation, the Playbook’s Action Roadmap and Strategic Framework link strategic foresight with participatory governance and sustainability assessment. Together, they offer a replicable model for building resilient, impact-driven innovation ecosystems that directly support the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and align with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles. Future research will deepen longitudinal evaluation and continuous learning to ensure that sustainable innovation practices continue to evolve and shape the future.
References
Aarikka-Stenroos L., Ritala P. (2017) Network management in the era of ecosystems: Systematic review and management framework. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.08.010
Adner R., Kapoor R. (2010) Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
Adner R., Kapoor R. (2016) Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: Re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2363
Bengston D.N., Mauno T., Hujala T. (2024) Horizon scanning: A process for identifying emerging signals of change shaping the future of natural resources management. Society and Natural Resources, 37(7), 1108–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2024.2335392
Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. (2009) ‘Mode 3’ and ‘quadruple helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46 (3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
CEE2ACT (2025) Skills and Knowledge Transfer to Boost the Bioeconomy (Policy Paper No. 3), Brussels: CEE2ACT.
Chatterjee P., Greenland S., Nguyen N. (2023) Barriers to sustainable innovation adoption: A qualitative investigation of metal additive printing from supply and demand perspectives. Cleaner Logistics and Supply Chain, 9, 100128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clscn.2023.100128
Csedő Z., Zavarkó M., Pörzse G. (2025) Exploring the role of transdisciplinary research in accelerating sustainability transition:
An empirical analysis of environmental innovation drivers in Central European energy sector. Energy Research & Social Science, 127, 104222.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104222
Elder M., Bengtsson M., Akenji L. (2016) An optimistic analysis of the means of implementation for sustainable development goals: Thinking about goals as means. Sustainability, 8(9), 962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8090962
European Commission (2009) Impact Assessment Guidelines (SEC (2009) 92, 15.1.2009), Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2013) Guide to social innovation, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2018) Bioeconomy: The European Way to Use Our Natural Resources — Action Plan 2018, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2020) How the Bioeconomy Contributes to the European Green Deal, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2021a) EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2021b) Pathway to a Healthy Planet for All: EU Action Plan ‘Towards Zero Pollution’ (COM(2021) 400), Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2022) European Bioeconomy Policy: Stocktaking and Future Developments — Progress Report, Brussels: European Commission.
European Commission (2023) Regional Innovation Valleys for Bioeconomy & Food Systems — Concept Note, Brussels: European Commission.
European Parliament, European Council (2024) Regulation on Nature Restoration (PE-CONS 74/23), Brussels: European Parliament, European Council.
FGV (2024) The Global Bioeconomy: Preliminary Stocktake of G20 Strategies and Practices. G20 Initiative on Bioeconomy, Brasilia: Getúlio Vargas Foundation.
Geels F. (2004) From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
Geels F.W., Schot J. (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
Georghiou L. (2018) A European ecosystem for social innovation, Brussels: EC Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
Georghiou L., Cassingena Harper J., Keenan M., Miles I., Popper R. (eds.) (2008) The Handbook of Technology Foresight: Concepts and Practice, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
German Bioeconomy Council (2018) Bioeconomy Policy Part III: Update Report of National Strategies around the World, Berlin: German Bioeconomy Council.
Giagnocavo C., Duque-Acevedo M., Terán-Yépez E., Herforth-Rahmé J., Defossez E., Carlesi S., Delalieux S., Gkisakis V., Márton A., Molina-Delgado D., Moreno J.C. (2025) A multi-stakeholder perspective on the use of digital technologies in European organic and agroecological farming systems. Technology in Society, 81, 102763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102763
Government of Finland (2022) The Finnish Bioeconomy Strategy 2022–2035: Sustainably towards Higher Value Added, Helsinki: Government of Finland.
Granstrand O., Holgersson M. (2020) Innovation eco-systems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90, 102098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Griggs D., Stafford-Smith M., Gaffney O., Rockström J., Öhman M.C., Shyamsundar P., Steffen W., Glaser G., Kanie N., Noble I. (2013) Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), 305–307. https://doi.org/10.1038/495305a
Hacking T., Guthrie P. (2008) A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated and sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 28 (2–3), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.03.002
Hall S., Workman M., Mazur C., Anable J., Powell M., Wagner S.M. (2022) Doing business model innovation for sustainability transitions — Bringing in strategic foresight and human centred design. Energy Research and Social Science, 90, 102685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102685
Hartley J. (2005) Innovation in Governance and Public Services: Past and Present. Public Money and Management, 25(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00447.x
Hurlbert M., Krishnaswamy J., Davin E., Johnson F.X., Mena C.F., Morton J., Myeong S., Viner D., Warner K., Wreford A., Zakieldeen S., Zommers Z. (2019) Risk management and decision making in relation to sustainable development. In: Climate Change and Land: An IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems (eds. P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo-Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, P. Zhai,
R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal-Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M. Belkacemi, J. Malley), Geneva: United Nations, pp. 673–800.
IACGB (2024) Global Bioeconomy: Recent Trends and Policy Drivers, Berlin: IACGB.
Juntunen J.K., Halme M., Korsunova A., Rajala R. (2019) Strategies for integrating stakeholders into sustainability innovation:
A configurational perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 36(3), 331–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12481
Ketata I., Sofka W., Grimpe C. (2015) The role of internal capabilities and firms’ environment for sustainable innovation: evidence for Germany. R&D Management, 45(1), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12052
Kim J.S., Flanagan K. (2024) The use of foresight to anticipate and prioritise innovation system failures: The case of machine learning in broadcasting in South Korea. Futures, 163, 103454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2024.103454
Köhler J., Geels F.W., Kern F., Markard J., Onsongo E., Wieczorek A., Alkemade F., Avelino F., Bergek A., Boons F., Fünfschilling L., Hess D., Holtz G., Hyysalo S., Jenkins K., Kivimaa P., Martiskainen M., McMeekin A., Mühlemeier M., Nykvist B., Pel B., Raven R., Rohracher H., Sandén B., Schot J., Sovacool B., Turnheim B., Welch D., Wells P. (2019) An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
Laakkonen A., Rusanen K., Hujala T., Gabrielsson M., Pykäläinen J. (2023) Implications of the sustainability transition on the industry value creation logic — Сase of Finnish pulp and paper industry. Silva Fennica, 57(3), 23024. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.23024
Le Blanc D. (2015) Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582
Lee J. (2018) Making hindsight foresight: Strategies and preparedness of failure management. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.12.002
Lovrić N., Fraccaroli C., Bozzano M. (2023) A future EU overall strategy for agriculture and forest genetic resources management: Finding consensus through policymakers’ participation. Futures, 151, 103179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2023.103179
Mariani L., Trivellato B., Martini M., Marafioti E. (2022) Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Collaborative Innovation: Evidence from Four European Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 180, 1075–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05193-z
Markard J., Truffer B. (2008) Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: Towards an integrated framework. Research Policy, 37(4), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004
Martini M., Marafioti E., Carminati M. (2020) Exploring the Role of Stakeholder Engagement for the Development of Sustainable Innovation Strategies. In: Governance and Management of Sustainable Innovation: Learning from Experience to Shape the Future (eds. M. Martini, R. Holsgens, R. Popper), Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, pp. 75–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46750-0_4
Mauno T., Catelo F., Bengston D.N., Pykäläinen J., Hujala T. (2023) How to identify and interpret weak signals of change in the forest bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics, 157, 103075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103075
Nilsson M., Chisholm E., Griggs D., Howden-Chapman P., McCollum D., Messerli P., Neumann B., Stevance A.S., Visbeck M., Stafford-Smith M. (2018) Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: Lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13, 1489–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
Nilsson M., Chisholm E., Griggs D., Howden-Chapman P., McCollum D., Messerli P., Neumann B., Stevance A.S., Visbeck M., Stafford-Smith M. (2018) Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: Lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13, 1489–1503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0604-z
Nilsson M., Griggs D., Visbeck M. (2016) Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 534(7607), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1038/534320a
OECD (2015) System Innovation: Synthesis Report, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2018) Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (4th ed.), Paris: OECD.
Oh D.S., Phillips F., Park S., Lee E. (2016) Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Pinkse J., Lüdeke-Freund F., Laasch O., Snihur Y., Bohnsack R. (2023) The organizational dynamics of business models for sustainability: Discursive and cognitive pathways for change. Organization and Environment, 36(2), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/10860266231176913
Popper M., Popper R., Rapetti C.A., Pique J.M. (2025a) Integrating Policy Agendas for Sustainable Innovation: A Quadruple Helix Approach to the European Green Deal and Sustainability Transitions. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 17(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2025-0009
Popper R. (2008) How are foresight methods selected? Foresight, 10(6), 62–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14636680810918586
Popper R., Popper M., Velasco G. (2017b) Towards a more responsible sustainable innovation assessment and management culture in Europe. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 9(4), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1515/emj-2017-0027
Popper R., Popper M., Velasco G. (2020a) Sustainable Innovation Assessment and Management Framework: Principles, Methodology and Practice. In: Governance and Management of Sustainable Innovation: Learning from Experience to Shape the Future (eds. M. Martini,
R. Holsgens, R. Popper), Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, pp. 3–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46750-0_1
Popper R., Rilla N., Niemelä K., Oksanen J., Deschryvere M., Virkkunen M., Loikkanen T. (2020b) The Future of Forest-based Bioeconomy Areas: Strategic openings in Uruguay and the World by 2050 (VTT Technology Paper No. 379), Turku: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.
Popper R., Velasco G., Bleda M., Amanatidou E., Ravetz J., Damianova Z., Kozarev V., Chonkova B., Tsin S., Avarello A., Martin L., Morris D. (2016a) Sustainable Innovation Conceptual Framework, Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
Popper R., Velasco G., Popper M. (2017a) CASI-F: Common Framework for the Assessment and Management of Sustainable Innovation (CASI project report deliverable 6.2), Brussels: European Commission.
Popper R., Velasco G., Ravetz J. (2016b) State-of-the-art of Sustainable Innovation: Climate action, environment, resource efficiency and raw materials, Brussels: European Commission.
Popper R., Villarroel Y., Popper R.W. (2025b) Towards a Sustainable Disruptive Growth Model: Integrating Foresight, Wild Cards and Weak Signals Analysis. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.24753
Sachs J.D. (2012) From millennium development goals to sustainable development goals. The Lancet, 379(9832), 2206–2211.
Sarkki S., Ludvig A., Fransala J., Melnykovych M., Živojinović I., Ravazzoli E., Bengoumi M., Nijnik M., Dalla Torre C., Górriz-Mifsud E., Labidi A. (2024) Women-led social innovation initiatives contribute to gender equality in rural areas: Grounded theory on five initiatives from three continents. European Countryside, 16(4), 534–562.
Tahvanainen V., Laakkonen A., Pesälä O., Pittaluga L., Hujala T., Pykäläinen J. (2024) Pulp addiction? Perspectives of local regime actors on the development of the growing pulp industry in Uruguay. Forest Policy and Economics, 164, 103248.
UNEP (2024) Global Resources Outlook 2024: Bend the Trend, Nairobi: UNEP.
Velasco G., Popper M., Popper R. (2020) An Inductive and Multidimensional Approach to Sustainable Innovation: Evidence from Multiple Case Studies. In: Governance and Management of Sustainable Innovation: Learning from Experience to Shape the Future (eds. M. Martini, R. Holsgens, R. Popper), Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York: Springer, pp. 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46750-0_9
Wiener M., Gattringer R., Strehl F. (2020) Collaborative open foresight — A new approach for inspiring discontinuous and sustainability-oriented innovations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 119370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.008
Winkel G., Lovrić M., Muys B., Katila P., Lundhede T., Pecurul M., Pettenella D., Pipart N., Plieninger T., Prokofieva I., Parra C., Pülzl H.,
Roitsch D., Roux J.L., Thorsen B.J., Tyrväinen L., Torralba M., Vacik H., Weiss G., Wunder S. (2022) Governing Europe’s forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options. Forest Policy and Economics, 145, 102849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102849
Woolthuis R.K., Lankhuizen M., Gilsing V. (2005) A system failure framework for innovation policy design. Technovation, 25, 609–619. Technovation, 25(6), 609–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2003.11.002

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
