![]() |
|
About
News Аrchive Editorial Board Peer Reviewing Publication Ethics Contacts Publication terms Authors guidelines Forthcoming articles ISSN 1995-459X print |
David Nicholas1, Eti Herman1, Anthony Watkinson1, Jie Xu2, Abdullah Abrizah3, Blanca Rodríguez-Bravo4, Cherifa Boukacem-Zeghmouri5, Tatiana Polezhaeva6, Marzena Świgon7Early Career Researchers between Predatory Publishing and Academic Excellence: The Views and Behaviours of the Millennials
2021.
Vol. 15.
No. 1.
P. 56–65
[issue contents]
The paper draws on evidence of predatory publishing obtained from the 4 year-long Harbingers research study of the changing scholarly communication attitudes and behaviour of early career researchers (ECRs). The project featured longitudinal interviews for its first 3 years with 116 ECRs researching science and social sciences who came from China, France, Malaysia, Poland, Spain, UK and USA. The interview data provided the building blocks for a questionnaire survey in the 4th year, which obtained 1600 responses from a global audience, which included arts and humanities ECRs and those from Russia. These studies investigated predatory publishing as part of general questioning about scholarly communications, in other words, in context. The main finding from the interview study were:
Citation:
Nicholas D., Herman E., Watkinson A., Xu J., Abrizah A., Rodriguez-Bravo B., Boukacem-Zeghmouri C., Polezhaeva T., Swigon M. (2021) Early Career Researchers between Predatory Publishing and Academic Excellence: The Views and Behaviours of the Millennials. Foresight and STI Governance, 15(1), 56–65 . DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2021.1.56.65 |