Keywords
technology transfer
Brazil
entrepreneurial university
innovation ecosystems
knowledge flows
university-industry interactions
How to Cite
Abstract
This research aims at addressing the factors that constrain the flow of knowledge between universities and industry when these players are embedded in peripheral contexts. A multiple-case study was carried out in order to describe and understand the limitations of universities as agents of innovation in peripheral ecosystems. Twenty-two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the coordinators of five Technological Innovation Centers (entities equivalent to TTO) of all Federal Institutes (five) located in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. The findings show that there are constraining elements associated with the socioeconomic environment (the lack of economic dynamism and low absorptive capacity at firms), with universities (a lack of infrastructure, resources, and available researchers) and intermediary agents (the lack of staff and institutional legitimacy). The observed conditions lead to challenges in fostering dense knowledge flows, thus perpetuating regional economic asymmetries and hindering the institutional evolution of academic institutions toward the notion of entrepreneurial universities. Our research contributes to literature by addressing in detail the limitations of universities in spurring dense innovation networks in laggard ecosystems. Instead, more complex co-evolutionary processes seem to be at play – and “silver bullet” policies are likely to offer disappointing results.
References
Baglieri D., Baldi F., Tucci C.L. (2018) University technology transfer office business models: One size does not fit all. Technovation, 76-77, 51-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2018.05.003
Bodas Freitas I.M., Geuna A., Rossi F. (2013) Finding the right partners: Institutional and personal modes of governance of university-industry interactions. Research Policy, 42(1), 50-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.007
Bodas Freitas I.M., Marques R.A., Silva E.M.D.P.E. (2013) University-industry collaboration and innovation in emergent and mature industries in new industrialized countries. Research Policy, 42(2), 443-453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.006
Bonaccorsi A. (2017) Addressing the disenchantment: Universities and regional development in peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(4), 293-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2016.1212711
Boschma R.A. (2005) Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1), 61-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Bourelos E., Beyhan B., McKelvey M. (2017) Is the prominent scientist the one who becomes an inventor? A matching of Swedish academic pairs in nanoscience to examine the effect of publishing on patenting. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 144-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx004
Brown R. (2016) Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 189-205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1145575
Bubela T.M., Caulfield T. (2010) Role and reality: Technology transfer at Canadian universities. Trends in Biotechnology, 28(9), 447-451. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.06.002
Clarysse B., Wright M., Lockett A., Mustar P., Knockaert M. (2007) Academic spin-offs, formal technology transfer and capital raising. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 609-640. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm019
Crescenzi R., Filippetti A., Iammarino S. (2017) Academic inventors: Collaboration and proximity with industry. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 730-762. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9550-z
D'Este P., Guy F., Iammarino S. (2013) Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter? Journal of Economic Geography, 13(4), 537-558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs010
Dalmarco G., Hulsink W., Blois G.V. (2018) Creating entrepreneurial universities in an emerging economy: Evidence from Brazil. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 99-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.015
Eisenhardt K. (1989) Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258557
Etzkowitz H. (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university-industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823-833. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
Etzkowitz H., De Mello J.M.C., Almeida M. (2005) Towards meta-innovation in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011
Fernandes A.C., de Souza B.C., Da Silva A.S., Suzigan W., Chaves C.V., Albuquerque E. (2010) Academy-industry links in Brazil: Evidence about channels and benefits for firms and researchers. Science and Public Policy, 37(7), 485-498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X512016
Fischer B.B., Schaeffer P.R., Vonortas N.S. (2019) Evolution of university-industry collaboration in brazil from a technology upgrading perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 330-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.001
Fischer B.B., Schaeffer P.R., Vonortas N.S., Queiroz S. (2018) Quality comes first: University-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 263-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-017-9568-x
Giannopoulou E., Yström A., Elmquist M., Fredberg T., Ollila S. (2010) Implications of openness: A study into (all) the growing literature on open innovation. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 5(3), 162-180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242010000300012
Granstrand O., Holgersson M. (2020) Innovation ecosystems: A conceptual review and a new definition. Technovation, 90-91, 102098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.102098
Guerrero M., Urbano D. (2017) The impact of triple helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations' performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119, 294-309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.015
Hayter C.S., Rasmussen E., Rooksby J.H. (2020) Beyond formal university technology transfer: Innovative pathways for knowledge exchange. Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9677-1
Huggins R., Izushi H., Prokop D. (2019) Regional advantage and the geography of networks: Explaining global-local knowledge sourcing patterns. Papers in Regional Science, 98(4), 1567-1584. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12423
Huggins R., Johnston A., Steffenson R. (2008) Universities, knowledge networks and regional policy. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 1(2), 321-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsn013
Kempton L. (2019) Wishful thinking? Towards a more realistic role for universities in regional innovation policy. European Planning Studies, 27(11), 2248-2265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1628183
Laursen K., Reichstein T., Salter A. (2011) Exploring the effect of geographical proximity and university quality on university-industry collaboration in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 45(4), 507-523. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903401618
Laursen K., Salter A. (2004) Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.004
Min J., Vonortas N.S., Kim Y. (2019) Commercialization of transferred public technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 10-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.003
Oh D.S., Phillips F., Park S., Lee E. (2016) Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.02.004
Sandström C., Wennberg K., Wallin M.W., Zherlygina Y. (2018) Public policy for academic entrepreneurship initiatives: A review and critical discussion. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(5), 1232-1256. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9536-x
Schaeffer P.R., Guerrero M., Fischer B.B. (2021) Mutualism in ecosystems of innovation and entrepreneurship: A bidirectional perspective on universities' linkages. Journal of Business Research, 134, 184-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.039
Siegel D.S., Wright M. (2015) Academic entrepreneurship: Time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582-595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12116
Stankevičienė J., Kraujalienė L., Vaiciukevičiūtė A. (2017) Assessment of technology transfer office performance for value creation in higher education institutions. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(6), 1063-1081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2017.1405841
Sánchez-Barrioluengo M., Benneworth P. (2019) Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 141, 206-218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017
Tödtling F., Lengauer L., Höglinger C. (2011) Knowledge sourcing and innovation in thick and thin regional innovation systems-comparing ICT firms in two Austrian regions. European Planning Studies, 19(7), 1245-1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2011.573135
Tödtling F., Trippl M. (2005) One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach. Research Policy, 34(8), 1203-1219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
Yin R. (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed.), Thousand Oaks, СА: Sage.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.