Abstract
A maturity assessment of technological projects is becoming an increasingly popular tool for innovation policy. It enables the accurate determining of risks and opportunities related to the creation of high-tech products. Determining the degree of technology readiness, especially at early stages of development, increases the performance of not only government programs, but also of business projects. This article presents a software interface for such expertise, the IAE/ITA TRL Calculator, designed for the Brazilian aerospace sector. The validation within a number of cases revealed its potential applicability in a wide variety of industries. This innovative software product includes a quality user guide and an improved visual interface that allows for easy and quick identification of issues that require additional effort in order to move the evaluated technology project to a higher level of readiness.
References
Araujo G.L.V. (2020) Maturity analysis of critical technologies in the area of propulsion for launching space vehicles (PhD Thesis in Space Systems, Testing and Launching), São José: Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (in Portuguese).
Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2018) Global Innovation Index, 2018. https://www.wipo.int/publications/ru/details.jsp?id=4330, дата обращения 26.09.2022.
Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO (2021) Global Innovation Index, 2021. https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/gii-2021-report, дата обращения 26.09.2022.
Dawson B. (2007) The impact of technology insertion on organizations, London: Human Factors Integration Design Technology Center. https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/7259386/the-impact-of-technology-insertion-on-organisations, дата обращения 29.09.2022.
ESA (2008) Technology Readiness Levels Handbook for Space Applications, Paris: European Space Agency. https://artes.esa.int/sites/default/files/TRL_Handbook.pdf, дата обращения 20.03.2021.
Mankins J.C. (2002) Approaches to strategic research and technology (R&T) analysis and road mapping. Acta Astronautica, 51(1), 3-21.
Mankins J.C. (2009) Technology readiness assessment: A retrospective. Acta Astronautica, 65(9-10), 1216-1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.058
NASA (2020) Systems Engineering Handbook, Washington, D.C.: NASA. https://www.nasa.gov/connect/ebooks/nasa-systems-engineering-handbook, дата обращения 15.07.2016.
OECD (2007) Science, technology and Industry Scoreboard 2007, Paris: OECD.
Olechowski A., Eppinger D., Joglekar N. (2015) Technology Readiness Levels at 40: A study of state-of-the-art use challenges, and opportunities (MIT Sloan School Working Paper 5127-15), Cambridge, MA: MIT Sloan School of Management. https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/96307/MITSloanWP5127-15_Eppinger_PICMET.pdf?sequence=1, дата обращения 20.03.2021.
Porter M. (2008) On Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Rocha D. (2016) An adaptation of the NBR ISO 16290:2015 Standard applied in Aerospace Sector Projects (PhD Thesis in Space Systems, Testing and Launching), São José: Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (in Portuguese).
Rycroft R., Kash D. (2004) Emerging patters of complex technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69, 581-606. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00171-8
Salgado M. (2016) Study on critical space vehicle technologies applied to the Institute of Aeronautics and Space (PhD Thesis), São José: Instituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (in Portuguese).
Schumpeter J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development, London: Transaction Publishers.
Sullivan M.J. (2007) GAO Review of Technology Transition Practices. Paper presented at the 4th Annual Acquisition Research Symposium, May 16, 2007. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA493759.pdf, дата обращения 17.04.2021

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.