Abstract
New and emerging technologies pose a serious challenge for the future of employment. As machines learn to accomplish increasingly complex production tasks, the concern arises that automation will wipe out a great number of jobs. This paper investigates the relationship between the risk posed by the automation of jobs and individual-level occupational mobility using a representative German household survey. It provides an overview of current trends and developments on the labor markets due to the automation of jobs. It also describes the most recent dynamics of self-employment and relates it to the risk of the automation of jobs.
The results suggest that the expected occupational changes such as losing a job, demotion at one’s current place of employment, or starting a job in a new field are likely to be driven by the high occupation-specific risk of automation. However, the switch to self-employment, both with and without employees, is more likely to occur from paid employment in occupations with a low risk of automation. Hence, the rising level of entrepreneurial activities is less likely due to jobs becoming obsolete over the course of automation, but rather due to the high number of opportunities offered by the digital age.
The issues addressed within the paper provide room for further investigation. Particularly, an important question concerns which additional skills workers in jobs with a high risk of automation should acquire in order to make themselves less susceptible to the negative consequences of such a change. More research is needed in order to develop educational strategies to make workers less susceptible to job loss due to automation.
References
Acs Z.J. (2011) High-impact Firms: Gazelles Revisited // Elgar Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development - National and Regional Perspectives / Ed. M. Fritsch. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 133-174.
Arntz M., Gregory T., Zierahn U. (2016) The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper № 189. Paris: OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en
Audretsch D.B., Thurik A.R. (2000) Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Vol. 10. P. 17-34.
Audretsch D.B., Thurik A.R. (2001) What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in the managed and entrepreneurial economies // Industrial and Corporate Change. Vol. 10. P. 267-315.
Autor D.H. (2014) Polanyi’s Paradox and the Shape of Employment Growth. NBER Working Paper № 20485. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Autor D.H. (2015) Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Work-place Automation // Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 29. № 3. Р. 3-30.
Autor D.H., Dorn D. (2013) The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market // American Economic Review. Vol. 103. № 5. P. 1553-1597.
Autor D.H., Levy F., Murnane R.J. (2003) The Skill Content of Recent Technological Change: An Empirical Exploration // Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 118. № 4. Р. 1279-1333.
Bauernschuster S. (2013) Dismissal protection and small firms' hirings: Evidence from a policy reform // Small Business Economics. Vol. 40. № 2. P. 293-307.
Baumol W.J. (2004) Entrepreneurial enterprises, large established firms and other components of the free-market growth-machine // Small Business Economics. Vol. 23. P. 9-21.
Brynjolfsson E., McAfee A. (2014) Race Against the Machine: How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Caliendo M., Fossen F.M., Kritikos A.S. (2009) Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs - New evidence from an experimentally-validated survey // Small Business Economics. Vol. 32. № 2. P. 153-167.
Caliendo M., Kritikos A.S. (2010) Start-Ups by the Unemployed: Characteristics, Survival and Direct Employment Effects // Small Business Economics. Vol. 35. № 1. Р. 71-92.
Chang J.-H., Huynh P. (2016) ASEAN in Transformation: The Future of Jobs at Risk of Automation. Bureau for Employers’ Activities. Working Paper № 9. Geneve: Internaltional Labour Office.
Costa P.T., McCrae R.R. (1992) Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: PAR.
Dengler K., Matthes B. (2015) Folgen der Digitalisierung für die Arbeitswelt. Substitu-ierbarkeitspotentiale von Berufen in Deutschland. IAB Forschungsbericht 11/2015. Nuremberg: Institute for Employment Research.
Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. (2013) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.
Frey C.B., Osborne M.A. (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol. 114. P. 254-280.
Fritsch M. (2011) The Effect of New Business Formation on Regional Development: Empirical Evidence, Interpretation, and Avenues for Further Research // Elgar Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development - National and Regional Perspectives / Ed. M. Fritsch. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 133-174.
Fritsch M., Kritikos A.S., Rusakova A. (2012) Who Starts a Business and Who is Self-Employed in Germany? Jena Economic Research Paper 001-2012. Jena: Friedrich Schiller University; Max Planck Institute of Economics.
Fritsch M., Kritikos A.S., Sorgner А. (2015) Why did self-employment increase so strongly in Germany? // Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. Vol. 27. P. 307-333.
Gerlitz J.Y., Schupp J. (2005) Zur Erhebung der Big-Five-basierten Persönlichkeits-merkmale im SOEP (Research Notes). Berlin: German Institute for Economic Research.
Goos M., Manning A., Salomons A. (2014) Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring // American Economic Review. Vol. 104. № 8. Р. 2509-2526.
Pajarinen M., Rouvinen P., Ekeland A. (2015) Computerization Threatens One-Third of Finnish and Norwegian Employment. ETLA Brief № 34. Helsinki: Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
Papke L.E., Wooldridge J.M. (1996) Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates // Journal of Applied Econometrics. Vol. 11. № 6. Р. 619-632.
Parker S.C. (2009) The Economics of Entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shane S. (2000) Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities // Organization Science. Vol. 11. № 4. Р. 448-469.
Shane S. (2009) Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy // Small Business Economics. Vol. 33. P. 141-149.
Sorgner A., Bode E., Krieger-Boden C. (2017a) The Effects of Digitalization on Gender Equality in the G20 Economies. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.
Sorgner A., Fritsch M., Kritikos A.S. (2017b) Do Entrepreneurs Really Earn Less? // Small Business Economics. Vol. 49. № 2. P. 139-169.
Wagner G., Frick J., Schupp J. (2007) The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) - Scope, Evolution and Enhancements // Schmollers Jahrbuch. Vol. 27. № 1. Р. 139-169.
Welter F. (2006) Women's entrepreneurship in Germany: Progress in a still traditional environment // Growth-oriented Women Entrepreneurs and Their Businesses: A Global Research Perspective / Eds. C.G. Brush, N.M. Carter, E.J. Gatewood, P.G. Greene, M.M. Hart. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. P. 128-153.
Åstebro T., Thompson P. (2011) Entrepreneurs, Jacks of All Trades or Hobos? // Research Policy. Vol. 40. P. 637-649.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.