The Concentration of Knowledge Activities in Italy: An Analysis at the Local Level
PDF (Русский)
PDF

Keywords

research and development
publication activity
local Labour System
municipality
regional policy
knowledge activities

How to Cite

MorettiniL., PeraniG., & SirilliG. (2013). The Concentration of Knowledge Activities in Italy: An Analysis at the Local Level. Foresight and STI Governance, 7(2), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2013.2.28.39

Abstract

Innovation activities localized in municipalities are increasingly regarded as the key to fostering growth at the regional level. A deeper statistical analysis of its main actors enables identifying previously unobvious interrelations and better understanding capacities of a territory. However in most countries the analysis of the geographical distribution of R&D until today has been based, so far, on data broken down at regional level. Only a few countries implement breaking down the available regional data to a much more detailed municipality level. The paper reports some preliminary results of such comprehensive study recently undertaken in Italy. It provides a descriptive analysis on localization of knowledge activities (R&D, patents, publications), evaluates the relationship among the knowledge activities performed by the key actors — business, public sector, higher education and private non-profit organizations, attempts to identify the sectorial R&D specialization of the Italian Local Labour Systems (LLSs).

The analysis shows that knowledge activities are quite spread over the Italian territory but, at the same time, they are also heavily concentrated. Only about half of LLSs accommodate public or private R&D performers or authors of scientific publications. The presented data largely confirm the traditional dichotomy between Northern and Southern Italy: Northern regions host the highest rates of the national R&D expenditure and have almost a monopoly for patents. When considering only large urban areas, there are no major differences in the geographical distribution of research expenditure and output.

The main difference is about the “less knowledge active” LLSs: in Southern Italy, for instance, there is a significant gap of research activities between the urban areas and the territories less intensively urbanized and industrialised. On the other hand, in the Northern regions, even small LLSs have some evidence of R&D expenditure or patents. These differences are strictly connected with the structure of university network and productive activities: in particular, Veneto and Emilia Romagna have a more even diffusion of R&D activities — there are a large number of universities as well as a plenty of small or medium innovative firms in these regions. In their turn, Piedmont and Lombardy concentrate their knowledge potential around the large urban areas. Relating to the first two regions the existence of a Regional Innovation System could be assumed, while in Piedmont and Lombardy a Local Innovation System has emerged.

https://doi.org/10.17323/1995-459X.2013.2.28.39
PDF (Русский)
PDF

References

Barca F. (2009) An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy. Independent Report.

Besten B., Lissoni F., Maurino A., Pezzoni M., Tarasconi G. (2012) APE-INV dissemination and users. Feedback Project (Mimeo), 21 March. Режим доступа: http://www.esf-ape-inv.eu/(дата обращения 14 марта 2013 г.).

Cantner U., Meder A., ter Wal A. L. J. (2010) Innovator network and regional knowledge base//Technovation. Vol. 30. P. 496-507.

Cavallaro C., Sirilli G. (2012) La geografia regionale//Il regionalismo italiano tra tradizioni unitarie e processi di federalismo/Ed. S. Mangiameli. ISSiRFA CNR, Giuffrè Editore.

Coppola G., Mazzotta F. (2005) I Sistemi Locali del Lavoro: Aspetti teorici ed empirici. CELPE Quaderni di Ricerca. № 2. University of Salerno.

Crescenzi R., Rodriguez-Pose A. (2011) Innovation and regional growth in the European Union. Springer.

D'Allura G.M., Galvagno M., Mocciaro Li Destro A. (2012) Regional Innovation Systems: A literature review//Business Systems Review. Vol. 1. № 1. Р. 139-156.

D'Este P., Guy F., Iammarino S. (2012) Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations: What type of proximity does really matter?//Journal of Economic Geography (forthcoming).

Dettori B., Marrocu E., Paci R. (2012) Total factor productivity, intangible assets and spatial dependence in the European regions//Regional Studies. Vol. 46. № 10. P. 1401-1416.

Doloreux D., Parto S. (2004) Regional Innovation Systems: A Critical Synthesis. UNI-INTECH Discussion Paper. The United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, UNU-INTECH.

Doloreux D., Parto S. (2005) Regional Innovation Systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues//Technology in Society. Vol. 27. P. 133-153.

Enflo K., Hjertstrand P. (2009) Relative sources of European regional productivity convergence: A bootstrap frontier approach//Regional Studies. Vol. 43. P. 643-659.

European Commission (2010) Investing in Europe's Future: Fifth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Publications Office of the European Union.

Iammarino S. (2005) An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives//European Planning Studies. Vol. 13. № 4. Р. 497-519.

Iammarino S., McCann P. (2006) The structure and evolution of industrial clusters: Transactions, technology and knowledge spillovers//Research policy. Vol. 35. № 7. Р. 1018-1036.

Krugman P. (1991) Increasing Returns and Economic Geography//The Journal of Political Economy. Vol. 99. № 3. Р. 483-499.

Lundvall B.-Å., Johnson B. (1994) The Learning Economy//Journal of Industry Studies. Vol. 1. № 2 (December). P. 23-42.

Martin R., Sunley P. (1998) Slow convergence? The new endogenous growth theory and regional development//Economic Geography. Vol. 74. № 3. Р. 201-227.

OECD (2011) Regions and innovation policy. Paris: OECD.

Paci R., Usai S. (2006) Agglomeration economies and growth. The case of Italian Local Labour Systems, 1991-2001. CRENOS Working Paper № 12/2006. Università di Cagliari, Università di Sassari.

Srholec M., Zizalova P. (2011) Mapping the geography of R&D: What can we learn for policy? (Mimeo).

Todtling F. (2010) Endogenous approaches to local and regional development policy//Handbook of Local and Regional Development/Eds. A. Pike, A. Rodriguez-Pose, J. Tomaney. Routledge. Р. 333-343.

Uyarra E. (2010) What is evolutionary about “regional systems of innovation”? Implications for regional policy//Journal of Evolutionary Economics. Vol. 20. P. 115-137.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.