Identifying robust ecosystem identities through scenario-based wind tunneling
PDF
PDF рус (Русский)

Keywords

Entrepreneurial ecosystems
Strategic foresight
Scenario planning
Innovation systems
Identity wind tunneling
navigating uncertainty

How to Cite

HernándezC.-G., & BasE. (2026). Identifying robust ecosystem identities through scenario-based wind tunneling. Foresight and STI Governance, 20(2), 32225. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2026.32225

Abstract

Scenario-based foresight has become an important analytical approach for exploring the long-term evolution of innovation systems and entrepreneurial ecosystems under conditions of uncertainty. However, many scenario exercises remain primarily descriptive and provide limited guidance regarding the systemic orientation that socio-economic systems can realistically sustain across multiple plausible futures. This study addresses this limitation by applying the Identity Wind Tunneling approach to examine the robustness of alternative ecosystem identities across contrasting future environments. The analysis is conducted using the Ecuadorian entrepreneurial ecosystem as an empirical case. Building on a previously developed scenario architecture describing five possible trajectories of ecosystem development toward 2040, five candidate ecosystem identities were evaluated through an identity–scenario compatibility matrix. The analysis considered four structural dimensions that characterize both ecosystem identities and scenario environments: governance coordination, innovation capability, financing structures, and market integration. Identity robustness was assessed by examining the number of scenarios in which each identity remained viable. The results indicate that an innovation-driven entrepreneurial ecosystem demonstrates the highest level of robustness across the scenario set. By extending Identity Wind Tunneling from the organizational level to the ecosystem level, the study introduces the concept of robust ecosystem identity as a foresight-informed framework for guiding long-term ecosystem development under uncertainty.

https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2026.32225
PDF
PDF рус (Русский)

References

Almeida J., Daniel A. (2024) Local governance of evolutionary entrepreneurial ecosystems. Local Economy, 38(8), 735–754. https://doi.org/10.1177/02690942241278637

Alvedalen J., Boschma R. (2017) A critical review of entrepreneurial ecosystems research: Towards a future research agenda. European Planning Studies, 25(6), 887–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694

Amer M., Daim T.U., Jetter A. (2013) A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003

Bosma N., Kelley D., Singer S., Szerb L. (2023) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2022/2023 Global Report, Washington, D.C.: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.

Chermack T.J. (2011) Scenario planning in organizations: How to create, use, and assess scenarios, San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

Fergnani A., Sweeney J.A. (2021) Identity wind tunneling: A method for discovering an organization's strategic identity using scenarios. Futures & Foresight Science, 3(3), e96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.96

Goodwin P., Wright G. (2001) Enhancing strategy evaluation in scenario planning: A role for decision analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00225

Hernández C.G., Bas E. (2026) Scenarios for the Ecuadorian entrepreneurial ecosystem toward 2040. European Journal of Futures Research (forthcoming). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-026-00265-z

Hsu C.-C., Sandford B. A. (2007) The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90

Jan S.Q., Ahmad N., Khan S.U., Ali S. (2025) The impact of entrepreneurial ecosystems and sustainable digital innovation on business performance: A study of Gilgit-Baltistan Pakistan. Frontiers in Sustainability, 6, 1485680. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2025.1485680

Isenberg D. (2010) How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review (June issue), 1–11.

Kantis H., Federico J. (2020) A dynamic model of entrepreneurial ecosystems evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Studies in Business, 5(1), 182–220. https://doi.org/10.1344/jesb2020.1.j072

Knight F.H. (1921) Risk, uncertainty and profit. Iowa City, IA: Houghton Mifflin.

Langlois R.N. (1990) Capabilities and coherence in firms and markets. In: The theory of the firm: Critical perspectives on business and management (ed. N.J. Foss.), New York: Routledge, pp. 71–100.

Lederman D., Messina J., Pienknagura S., Rigolini J. (2014) Latin American entrepreneurs: Many firms but little innovation, Washington, D.C. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0012-2

Mack E., Mayer H. (2016) The evolutionary dynamics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Urban Studies, 53(10), 2118–2133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015586547

Mason C., Brown R. (2014) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and growth oriented entrepreneurship, Paris: OECD.

North D.C. (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

North D.C. (1997) The contribution of the new institutional economics to an understanding of the transition problem, Helsinki: United Nations University.

Okoli C., Pawlowski S.D. (2004) The Delphi method as a research tool: An example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002

Queissner M., Stolz S., Weiss M. (2025) A meta-analysis of entrepreneurial ecosystem elements and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 64, 1817–1847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-024-00953-9

Ralston B., Wilson I. (2006) The scenario planning handbook, Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.

Schoemaker P.J.H. (1995) Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.

Spigel B. (2017) The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167

Spigel B. (2020) Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Theory, practice and futures, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

Stam E. (2015) Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484

Stam E., van de Ven A. (2021) Entrepreneurial ecosystem elements. Small Business Economics, 56(2), 809–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6

Van der Heijden K. (2005). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation (2nd ed.), New York: Wiley.

Vecchiato R. (2012) Environmental uncertainty, foresight and strategic decision making: An integrated study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(3), 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.010

Wurth B., Stam E., Spigel B. (2022) Toward an entrepreneurial ecosystem research program. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 729–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258721998948

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.