Keywords
BRICS
emerging potential
innovation
digital transformation
human capital
governance
technological transitions
How to Cite
Abstract
In the context of the modern global economy, key drivers of radical change are coming to the fore – transformational transitions to a more complex model – the knowledge economy in its broadest sense. A shift of this magnitude requires new approaches to capacity building for all countries, regardless of their level of development. The emerging imperative provides a wide range of opportunities for developing countries, suggesting a new configuration of the global economic landscape and strategic alliances. The BRICS countries (China, India, Russia, Brazil, UAE, Indonesia, South Africa, Iran, Egypt, Ethiopia) represent a critical mass of players whose actions will determine the direction in which these processes will develop.
This article provides a comparative analysis of the innovative and transformational potential of the participants in this block in knowledge-intensive sectors in comparison with one another and with two developed benchmark countries – Austria and Australia. A methodology for calculating a comprehensive index of readiness for the knowledge economy is proposed. The countries under review are ranked on four levels based on the values of this indicator. Their degree of adaptation and readiness for transformational transitions to more complex levels, resource base, educational systems, indicators of patent publication activity, management efficiency, quality of human capital, infrastructure, and global integration capabilities are assessed. Recommendations are presented on policy measures for the development of intellectual economy sectors in the BRICS countries, as well as directions for future research.
References
Abdullah-Kaiser Z.R.M. (2024) Smart governance for smart cities and nations. Journal of Economy and Technology, 2(11), 216–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ject.2024.07.003
Almulhim A.I., Yigitcanlar T. (2025) Understanding Smart Governance of Sustainable Cities: A Review and Multidimensional Framework. Smart Cities, 8(4), 113. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8040113
AlRaeesi S.A.Y., Rahman M.H. (2018) Smart Government Services, Transformation Process in the UAE: Role of Telecommunications Regulatory Authority and Its Policy Lessons (Policy Brief No. 51, December 2018), Dubai: Mohammed Bin Rashid School of Government.
Anthony M. (2025) Rethinking Global Education for Sustainability: Learning from East Asia’s Relational Turn. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(4), 52–67. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.29081
Arslan A., Yener S., Akturan A. (2025) The Dark Side of ESG Ratings: Future Challenges for Financial Resources of Firms. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(3), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.26712
Avelino F., Wittmayer J.M. (2016) Shifting Power Relations in Sustainability Transitions: A Multi-actor Perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
Boonman H., Verstraten P., van der Weijde A.H. (2023) Macroeconomic and environmental impacts of circular economy innovation policy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 35, 216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.025
Borgström S. (2019) Balancing diversity and connectivity in multi-level governance settings for urban transformative capacity. Ambio, 48, 463–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-01142-1
Borrás S., Haakonsson S., Hendriksen С., Gerli F., Poulsen T.R., Pallesen T., Croxatto S.L., Kugelberg S., Larsen H. (2024) The transformative capacity of public sector organisations in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 53, 100904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2024.100904
Božić V. (2025) Smart economy as a key factor in the transformation of urban environments (ResearchGate Working Paper 387893694). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387893694_Smart_Economy_as_a_Key_Factor_in_the_Transformation_of_Urban_Environments (accessed 08.11.2025).
Broekel T., Klarl T. (2025) The long-term evolution of technological complexity and its relationship with economic growth. Technovation, 144, 103233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103233
Carayannis E., Campbell D.F.J. (2012) Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and How Do Knowledge, Innovation and the Environment Relate To Each Other? International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development,1(1), 41–69. https://doi.org/10.4018/jsesd.2010010105
Castán-Broto V., Trencher G., Iwaszuk E., Westman L. (2019) Transformative capacity and local action for urban sustainability. Ambio, 48, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1086-z
Chang Q., Mengtao W., Zhang L. (2024) Endogenous growth and human capital accumulation in a data economy. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 69(6), 298–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.12.015
Fazio G., Maioli S., Rujimora N. (2025) The twin innovation transitions of European regions. Regional Studies, 59(1), 2309176. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2024.2309176
Förster J.J., Downsborough L., Biber-Freudenberger L., Kelboro-Mensuro G., Börner J. (2021) Exploring criteria for transformative policy capacity in the context of South Africa's biodiversity economy. Policy Sciences, 54, 209–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09385-0
Galindo-Martin M.A., Mendez-Picazo M.T., Perez-Pujol R.S. (2025) Open innovation and sustainable development: A micro and macroeconomic analysis using a mixed method research with PLS-SEM-NCA and Delphi. International Journal of Information Management, 82, 102874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102874
Gatzweiler F.W. (2014) Value, institutional complementarity and variety in coupled socio-ecological systems. Ecosystem Services, 10(12), 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.004
Hagbert P., Malmqvist T. (2019) Actors in transition: Shifting roles in Swedish sustainable housing development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 34, 697–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-019-09695-7
Helveston J.P., Wang Y., Karplus V.J., Fuchs E.R.H. (2019) Institutional complementarities: The origins of experimentation in China’s plug-in electric vehicle industry. Research Policy, 48(1), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.08.006
Hluszko С., Ramos-Huarachi D.A., Castillo-Ulloa M.I., Salvador R., Puglieri F.N. (2024) How do the BRICS approach sustainable concerns? A systematic literature review. Environmental Development, 52, 101075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2024.101075
Hölscher K., Frantzeskaki N. (2020) Transformative Climate governance. A capacities Perspective to systematize, Evaluate and Guide Climate Action, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Homsy G.C., Warner M.E. (2015) Cities and Sustainability: Polycentric Action and Multilevel Governance. Urban Affairs Review, 51(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087414530545
Hu G.G. (2021) Is knowledge spillover from human capital investment a catalyst for technological innovation? The curious case of fourth industrial revolution in BRICS economies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120327
Ioannou I. (2025) What The ESG Backlash Reveals — and What Comes Next. Forbes, March 25, https://www.forbes.com/sites/lbsbusinessstrategyreview/2025/03/25/what-the-esg-backlash-reveals-and-what-comes-next/, accessed 24.01.2026.
Isaksson K., Hagbert P. (2020) Institutional capacity to integrate ‘radical’ perspectives on sustainability in small municipalities: Experiences from Sweden. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.05.002
Karbalaei M.A., Saifoddin A., Zahedi A., Abdoos M. (2025) Macroeconomic impact of energy transition: A comparative study of developed and developing countries. Energy Strategy Reviews, 62, 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2025.101910
Kim D.R., Yoon J.H. (2018) Decentralization, Government Capacity, and Environmental Policy Performance: A Cross-National Analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(13), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1318917
Kim D.R., Yoon J.H. (2018) Decentralization, Government Capacity, and Environmental Policy Performance: A Cross-National Analysis. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(13), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1318917
Liu Y., Lin Y. C. (2025) Converting Knowledge into Productivity: The role of intellectual property empowerment and digital economy in enhancing regional new quality productivity forces – Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 102, 104316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2025.104316
Loorbach D.A., Wittmayer J. (2024) Transforming universities. Mobilizing research and education for sustainability transitions at Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Sustainability Science, 19, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01335-y
López-Fernández D., Oliver M. (2025) Methodology, strategies, and factors for business innovation in large companies. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 9(2), 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2025.02.002
Moore M.L., Milkoreit M. (2020) Imagination and transformations to sustainable and just futures. Elementa, 8(1), 081. https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2020.081
Muñoz-Hermoso S., Domínguez-Mayo F.J., Cerrillo-i-Martínez A., Benavides D. (2025) A Conceptual Framework for Smart Governance Systems Implementation. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 21(1), 376170. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.376170
Nagy A., Gáspár J. (2025) Responsible organizational transformation: Social and systemic challenges, and the role of foresight. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101325
Nelson R.R. (ed.) (1993) National innovation systems: A comparative analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
OECD (2021) Digital transformation in the public secto, Paris: OECD.
OECD (2024) Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Implications for Education and Learning, Paris: OECD.
Romer D. (2011) Endogenous Growth. In: Advanced Macroeconomics (4th ed.), New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 101–149.
Saba C.S., Ngepah N. (2024) The impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on employment and economic growth in BRICS: Does the moderating role of governance matter? Research in Globalization, 8, 100213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2024.100213
Shields R. (2019) The sustainability of international higher education: Student mobility and global climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 594–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.291
UNESCO (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development, Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Ustyuzhantseva O. (2025) Imagining the Digital University: Infrastructural Logics and Institutional Futures in the Global South. Foresight and STI Governance, 19(4), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.17323/fstig.2025.29082
Vázquez-Flores E., López-Rodríguez L., Navas M., Brambilla M. (2026) Alliances for social change: Linking majority-group cultural adoption to collective action intentions. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 111, 102367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2026.102367
Weber K.M., Rohracher H. (2012) Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: Combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive ‘failures’ framework. Research Policy, 41, 1037–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015
WEF (2025) New Economy Skills: Unlocking the Human Advantage, Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Westley F.R., Tjornbo O., Schultz L., Olsson P., Folke C., Crona B., Bodin Ö. (2013) A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05072-180327
WIPO (2024) World intellectual property indicators 2024, Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
World Bank (2023) Digital Progress and Trends Report 2023, Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
Wu L., Fang J. (2024) How Higher Education Affects Corporate Human Capital Investment: Based on Upper Echelons Theory. Finance Research Letters, 69(A), 106019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106019
Wu X., Ramesh M., Howlett M. (2018) Policy Capacity: Conceptual Framework and Essential Components. In: Policy Capacity and Governance: Assessing Governmental Competences and Capabilities in Theory and Practice (eds. X. Wu, M. Howlett, M. Ramesh), Cham: Springer, pp. 1–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54675-9_1
Yoshikuni A.C., Dwivedi R., Tito E.P., Teixeira de Melo D., Emrich L.B., Dias-Miranda M.A., de Oliveira F.S. (2025) How does knowledge strategy planning enhance ambidexterity through business model innovation? The perspective for digital technologies in developing economies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 30(1), 338–366. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2025-0120
Zhao X., Sokolov A., Cassiolato J.E. (eds.) (2025) The Innovation Competitiveness of BRICS Countries, Cham: Springer.
Zheng L. (2025) What comes after DEI. How a new framework built around fairness, access, inclusion, and representation can succeed where DEI has failed. Harvard Business Review (January issue). https://hbr.org/2025/01/what-comes-after-dei, accessed 24.01.2026.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.