Journal of the National Research University Higher School of Economics




Editorial Сouncil

Peer Reviewing

Publication Ethics


Publication terms

Authors guidelines

Forthcoming articles

ISSN 1995-459X print
E-ISSN 2312-9972 online
ISSN 2500-2597 online English

Leonid Gokhberg


Khelena Zavyalova, Artem Alsufyev1, Inna Krakovetskaya2, Wan Lijun3, Jessica Li4
  • 1 School of Management of the St. Petersburg University, 3 Volkhovskiy Lane, St. Petersburg 199004, Russian Federation
  • 2 National Research Tomsk State University, 36 Lenina Str., 634050, Tomsk, Russian Federation
  • 3 Chinese-Russian Institute at the Shenyang Polythechnical University, 6 Nanpingzhong Rd Hunnan New District of Shenyang City, Liaoning Province, China
  • 4 University of Illinois Urbana Champaign, USA, 61820, Champaign, 354 Education Bldg 1310 S

Personnel Development in Chinese Innovation-Active Companies

2018. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 43–52 [issue contents]

This article is devoted to an analysis of the mechanisms and tools that promote innovative activity at Chinese companies. We describe and evaluate the model of the Chinese innovation ecosystem with its major subsystems and their interconnections. Personnel training and development are considered an element of the subsystem “Education” within the innovation ecosystem, which serve as tools for the formation of human resources to ensure the transformation of the national economy into a global center of innovation. The authors analyze the main challenges connected with level of development of the environment and the socioeconomic institutions that may impede the effective management of human resources and the various practices for training personnel at innovative companies in China. The data analyzed for this empirical study on training and development practices includes structured interviews at 60 medium and large innovative companies in China. Objective economic indicators of innovative activity were taken as measures. The analysis results allow one to identify four clusters of companies: “Innovators,” “Leader in Training,” “Stars,” and “Lagging behind,” describing the different company approaches to providing personnel training and development. Clusters vary in quantitative and qualitative indicators for personnel training and development processes, as well as economic indicators of innovation activity. The results prove that a relationship exists between approaches to personnel training and development and innovative activity results and suggest that training and development initiatives are effective tools for managing innovative companies.

Citation: Zavyalova E., Alsufyev A., Krakovetskaya I.,Lijun W., Li J. (2018) Personnel Development in Chinese Innovation-Active Companies.Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 12, no 3, pp. 43–52. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2018.3.43.52
Rambler's Top100 rss