Abstract
This paper aims to address the limitations of traditional strategic foresight methodologies, specifically the Futures Cone (FC), by introducing and evaluating a novel framework called the Adaptive Futures Mesh (AFM). The study employs a conceptual analysis, drawing on systems thinking, complexity science, and participatory design principles to develop the AFM. The AFM is structured around key components including a dynamic mesh network, uncertainty gradients, adaptive feedback loops, and an emergence engine. The analysis finds that the AFM offers a more robust approach to navigating uncertainty by explicitly incorporating unknown unknowns (dark matter nodes). It visualizes cascading impacts, emphasizing human agency, and enables continuous adaptation through feedback loops. Research limitations include the lack of empirical validation and potential challenges in implementing the AFM across diverse contexts. However, the AFM offers significant practical implications for strategic planning. It enables organizations to move beyond prediction and cultivate futures-readiness. Socially, the AFM promotes more inclusive and equitable futures by democratizing foresight and empowering stakeholders to shape their own destinies. The originality and value of this paper lie in its articulation of a novel, adaptive framework that enhances strategic resilience in facing complexity and multiple crises.
References
Anderson E.E. (1971) Modern physics and quantum mechanics, Philadelphia, PA: Saunders.
Bendor R., Eriksson E., Pargman D. (2021) Looking backward to the future: On past-facing approaches to futuring. Futures, 125, 102666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102666
Bohr N. (2011) Atomic theory and the description of nature: Four essays with an introductory survey, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chapman G.B., Johnson E.J. (1994) The limits of anchoring. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7(4), 223–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.3960070402
Choudhury P.P. (2023) Formation of multiphase plasma in galactic haloes and an analogy to solar plasma. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 10, 1155865. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspas.2023.1155865
Colosi D., Rovelli C. (2009) What is a particle? Classical and Quantum Gravity, 26(2), 025002. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/2/025002
Copenhaver R. (2019) Philosophy of mind in the early modern and modern ages, New York: Routledge.
Cristofaro M., Sousa M.J., Sánchez-García J.C., Larsson A. (eds.) (2021) Managerial and entrepreneurial decision making: Emerging issues, Basel: MDPI.
Drees L., Liehr S., Batbuyan B., Marg O., Mehring M. (2022) In search of a nomadic pastoralism for the 21st century. A transdisciplinary development of future scenarios to foster a social-ecological transformation in Mongolia. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 35(3), 481–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2100744
Eliade M., Trask W.R., Smith J.Z. (2018) The myth of the eternal return: Cosmos and history (1st ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Érdi P. (2008) Complexity explained, Cham: Springer.
Estrada E. (2024) What is a complex system, after all? Foundations of Science, 29(4), 1143–1170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09917-w
Futch M.J. (2008) Leibniz’s metaphysics of time and space, Cham: Springer.
Gall T., Vallet F., Yannou B. (2022) How to visualise futures studies concepts: Revision of the futures cone. Futures, 143, 103024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.103024
Garrett K., Duda G. (2011) Dark Matter: A Primer. Advances in Astronomy, 2011, 968283. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/968283
Hancock T., Bezold C. (1994) Possible futures, preferable futures. Healthcare Forum Journal, 37(2), 23–29.
Hawking S.W. (2011) A brief history of time: From the big bang to black holes, New York: Bantam.
Hawking S.W., Penrose R. (2015) The nature of space and time (2nd ed.), Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400834747
Heisenberg W. (2013) Physical principles of the quantum theory (first published in 1930), New York: Dover Publications.
Henchey N. (1977) The future of Quebec: Alternative scenarios. McGill Journal of Education, 12(1), 17–27.
Hutton S. (1977) Some renaissance critiques of Aristotle’s theory of time. Annals of Science, 34(4), 345–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033797700200271
Hvidtfeldt R. (2018) The structure of interdisciplinary science, Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90872-4
Hynes W., Lees M., Müller J.M. (eds.) (2020) Systemic thinking for policy making: The potential of systems analysis for addressing global policy challenges in the 21st century, Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/879c4f7a-en
Jaffe A. (2018) The illusion of time. Nature, 556(7701), 304–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04558-7
Kunseler E.-M., Tuinstra W., Vasileiadou E., Petersen A.C. (2015) The reflective futures practitioner: Balancing salience, credibility and legitimacy in generating foresight knowledge with stakeholders. Futures, 66, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.006
Maltarich M., Havrylyshyn A. (2023) The emergence engine: Socially mediated individual change. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1), 13126. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.84bp
Mangnus A.C., Oomen J., Vervoort J.M., Hajer M.A. (2021) Futures literacy and the diversity of the future. Futures, 132, 102793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102793
Mao H., Liu S. (2023) Research on the influence of innovative design based on the futures cone In: Proceedings of the 2022 2nd International Conference on Computer Technology and Media Convergence Design (CTMCD 2022) (eds. K. Subramanian, J. Ouyang, W. Wei.), New York: Atlantis Press International BV, vol. 99, pp. 403–410. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-046-6_48
Meadows D.H., Wright D. (2008) Thinking in systems: A primer, London: Chelsea Green Pub.
Merleau-Ponty M. (2004) World of perception, New York: Routledge.
Migone A., Howlett M. (2024) Multiple streams and plausibility cones: Using concepts from future studies to depict policy dynamics. International Journal of Public Administration, 48(5–6), 368–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2024.2381769
Miller R. (2018) Transforming the future: Anticipation in the 21st century, New York: Routledge.
Muntwiler C. (2023) Cognitive biases and debiasing in strategic decision making (PhD thesis), St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.
Nickerson R.S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
Nozick R. (2001) Invariances: The structure of the objective world, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Oosterling H.A.F., Tiemersma D. (eds.) (1996) Time and temporality in intercultural perspective, Leiden (Netherlands): Brill.
Overton W.F. (1994) The arrow of time and the cycle of time: Concepts of change, cognition, and embodiment. Psychological Inquiry, 5(3), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0503_9
Partelow S. (2018) A review of the social-ecological systems framework. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 26796887. JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26796887
Raczkowski K., Komorowski P. (eds.) (2025) International economic policy for the polycrisis, New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003487913
Ramos V.J. (2019) Analyzing the role of cognitive biases in the decision making process, Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Rovelli C. (2007) Quantum gravity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schliesser E. (2013) Newton’s philosophy of time. In: A companion to the philosophy of time (eds. H. Dyke, A. Bardon), New York: Wiley, pp. 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118522097.ch6
Skov M., Nadal M. (eds.) (2023) The Routledge international handbook of neuroaesthetics, New York: Routledge.
Stechert P. (2006) Informatics system comprehension: A learner-centred cognitive approach to networked thinking. Education and Information Technologies, 11(3–4), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-006-9014-4
Sterman J.D. (2000) Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world (International student edition), New York: McGraw-Hill.
Park E., Shin H. (2024) Contextualizing comedy techniques for speculative design: Unraveling futures cone from sketch comedy series, ‘2032/2033 futures’. Paper presented at the DRS2024 Conference, 23–28 June, Boston, USA. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2024.433
Tabatabaei N. (2011) Detecting weak signals by internet-based environmental scanning (Master’s Thesis), Waterloo: University of Waterloo.
Taleb N.N. (2010) The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (2nd ed.), New York: Random House.
Taleb N.N. (2012) Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder, New York: Random House.
Van den Ende M.A., Wardekker A., Hegger D.L.T., Mees H.L.P., Vervoort J.M. (2022) Reflection: Applying participatory foresight methods in practice. In: Towards a climate-resilient future together (eds. M.A. van den Ende, A. Wardekker, D.L.T. Hegger, H.L.P. Mees, J.M. Vervoort), Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07682-4_4
Varela F.J., Depraz N. (2005) At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 61–81.
Voros J. (2003) A generic foresight process framework. Foresight, 5(3), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698379
Walker B., Holling C.S., Carpenter S.R., Kinzig A.P. (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00650-090205
Winkler J., Moser R. (2016) Biases in future-oriented Delphi studies: A cognitive perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.021
Zavala Rodríguez E.B., Marco Gómez J., Franch Gutiérrez J. (2019) Towards adaptative monitoring for self-adaptative systems, Barcelona: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.