Abstract
The article deals with benchmarking in the field of innovation in European countries. The concept of benchmarking is widely used at the firms’ level as well as in the field of research, innovation, knowledge. Experiences promoted by the European Union aimed at positioning the various countries and regions with the aim of implementing economic wealth and social cohesion policies through enhanced innovation performance are analysed. Many indicators are used in benchmarking exercises – more than one hundred in the various regular publications; they are presented in two modalities: individually, through tables and graphs, and in a synthetic form through the calculation of composite indicators. In the article, examples of the two modalities are reported. In particular the methodological features of composite indicators are addressed, and their strengths and weaknesses are dealt with. It is concluded that, having innovation benchmarking become a widely spread tool in the formulation of innovation policies, it is appropriate that it is further developed from a methodological point of view and that analysts and policy maker use it in a more skilful way, being aware of its strengths and weaknesses.
References
Balzat M., Ebersberger B. Evaluating the Performance of National Innovation Systems, 2005, quoted by: Grupp H. How robust are composite indicators fro evaluating the performance of national innovation systems? Paper for: International Conference in honour of Keith Pavitt, November 13-15. SPRU, 2003.
Barrй R. Sense and nonsense of S&T productivity indicators. Paper for: Conference on The contribution of socio-economic research to the benchmarking of RTD policies in Europe. European Commission, Brussels, March 15-16, 2001.
Ebersberger B. Benchmarking Finnish Competitiveness. Typescript, 2002, quoted by: Grupp H. How robust are composite indicators fro evaluating the performance of national innovation systems? Paper for: International Conference in honour of Keith Pavitt, November 13-15. SPRU, 2003.
European Commission, Committee of the Regions. Mutual Learning Platform. Regional Innovation report. Blueprint for Regional Benchmarking. Brussels, October, 2006. http://www.innovating-regions.org/download/MPL_Benchmarking_25_Sept.pdf.
European Commission. European Innovation Scoreboard 2006. Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance. Brussels, 2006.
European Commission. Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators, 2003. Brussels, 2003.
European Regional Innovation Scoreboard. European Commission. Brussels, 2006. http://trendchart.cordis.europa.eu/scoreboards/scoreboard2006/pdf/eis_2006_regional_innovation_scoreboard.pdf.
Eurostat. Community Innovation Statistics. Fourth Community Innovation Survey (CIS4) and European Innovation Scoreboard (EIS) 2006. Statistics in Focus, 116/2007.
Freudenberg M. Composite indicators of country performance. A critical assessment. STI Working Paper 2003/16. Paris: OECD, 2003.
Geisler E. The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, 2000.
Grupp H. How robust are composite indicators for evaluating the performance of national innovation systems? Paper for: International Conference in honour of Keith Pavitt, SPRU, November 13-15, 2003. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Units/spru/events/ocs/viewpaper.php?id=245.
Grupp H., Matial S. Managing New Product Development - а Microeconomic Toolbox. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, US: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2001.
Grupp H., Mogee M.E. Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? // Research Policy, 2004, v. 33, №9, November, pp. 1373-1384.
ISTAT. La regionalizzazione dei dati CIS4. Mimeo, 2007.
Kearnes D. T. Quality improvement b 1. egins at the top // World, v. 20 (5), 1986, p. 21.
Lundvall B. A. (ed.). National Systems of Innovation. London: Pinter, 1992.
Nardo M., Saisana A., Saltelli A., Tarantola A., Hoffman A., Giovannini E. Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. Statistics Working Paper. Paris: OECD, 2005.
OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook. Paris: OECD, 2006.
OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard. Paris: OECD, 2005.
OECD, Eurostat. Oslo Manual. Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data. 3rd Edition. Paris: 2005.
Paasi M. Collective benchmarking of policies: an instrument for policy // Science and Public Policy, v. 32 (1), 2005, pp. 17-27.
Patel P., Pavitt K. Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation. In: Stoneman P. (ed.). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Oxford and Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell, 1995.
Perani G., Prisco M. R., Sirilli G. Innovation at regional level: The CIS4 two-tiered survey in Italy. Paper for: «Blue Sky» II Forum on «What Indicators for Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in the 21st Century?». OECD - Statistics Canada, Ottawa, September 25-27, 2006.
Region Lazio Innovation Scoreboard (RLIS) 2006. Roma, 2006. http://www.filas.it/Downloads/documentazione/Scoreboard_2006_inglese.pdf.
Sirilli G. Developing science and technology indicators at the OECD: The NESTI network. Paper for: RICYT Seminar «Knowledge networks as a new form of collaborative creation: their construction, dynamics and management». Buenos Aires, November 24-25, 2005. http://www.issirfa.cnr.it/3128,2.html.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.