Отраслевой анализ моделей потребления интеллектуальных деловых услуг в странах Европейского Союза
PDF
PDF (English)

Ключевые слова

интеллектуальные деловые услуги
таблицы «затраты-выпуск»
страны Европы
модели потребления

Как цитировать

ЧичкановН. (2022). Отраслевой анализ моделей потребления интеллектуальных деловых услуг в странах Европейского Союза. Форсайт, 16(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.1.22.33

Аннотация

Структуру потребления и значение интеллектуальных деловых услуг (ИДУ) (knowledge-intensive business services, KIBS) в экономике европейских стран продуктивно рассматривать, исходя из перспективы различных отраслей. Эмпирической основой для такого анализа могут служить таблицы «затраты — выпуск», представленные в последней версии Мировой базы данных «затраты — выпуск» (WIOD). Этот массив позволяет выявить крупнейших и наиболее интенсивных пользователей ИДУ на отраслевом уровне, включая обрабатывающую промышленность, рыночные услуги и другие сектора экономики. Анализ данных позволяет подтвердить высокую неоднородность сегментов ИДУ и моделей потребления шести видов ИДУ, сведения о которых отражаются в WIOD. Подобная вариативность может быть обусловлена синергией, возникающей на пересечении различных видов ИДУ с потребляющими их отраслями.

https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2022.1.22.33
PDF
PDF (English)

Литература

Amara N., D'Este P., Landry R., Doloreux D. (2016) Impacts of obstacles on innovation patterns in KIBS firms. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4065-4073. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.045

Antonioli D., Di Berardino C., Onesti G. (2020) Specialization and KIBS in the Euro area: A vertically integrated sector perspective. International Review of Applied Economics, 34(2), 267-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2019.1708278

Baker P. (2007) The Impact of Business-services Use on Client Industries: Evidence from Input-output Data. In: Business Services in European Economic Growth (eds. L. Rubalcaba, H. Kox), London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 97-115.

Behrens V., Berger M., Hud M., Hunermund P., Iferd Y., Peters B., Rammer C., Schubert T. (2017) Innovation Activities of Firms in Germany - Results of the German CIS 2012 and 2014, Mannheim: Fraunhofer ISI, ZEW. https://madoc.bib.uni-mannheim.de/43222/1/dokumentation1704.pdf, дата обращения 08.01.2022.

Chichkanov N., Miles I., Belousova V. (2021) Drivers for innovation in KIBS: Evidence from Russia. The Service Industries Journal, 41(7-8), 489-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1570151

Ciriaci D., Palma D. (2016) Structural change and blurred sectoral boundaries: Assessing the extent to which knowledge-intensive business services satisfy manufacturing final demand in Western countries. Economic Systems Research, 28(1), 55-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2015.1101370

D'Anotne S., Santos J.B. (2016) When purchasing professional services supports innovation. Industrial Marketing Management, 58, 172-186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.05.024

Den Hertog P. (2000) Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Co-producers of Innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 491-528. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S136391960000024X

Di Berardino C., Onesti G. (2018) Services, Vertical Linkages, and Development: The Case of the Baltic Countries. Eastern European Economics, 56(2), 149-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2017.1416956

Di Berardino C., Onesti G. (2020) The two-way integration between manufacturing and services. The Service Industries Journal, 40(5-6), 337-357. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2018.1438415

Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., Timmer M. P., de Vries G.J. (2013) The Construction of World Input-Output Tables in the WIOD Project. Economic Systems Research, 25(1), 71-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2012.761180

Doloreux D., Gomez I. (2017) A review of (almost) 20 years of regional innovation systems research. European Planning Studies, 25(3), 371-387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2016.1244516

Giannakis E., Bruggeman A. (2015) Economic crisis and regional resilience: Evidence from Greece. Papers in Regional Science, 96(3), 451-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12206

Gotsch M., Hipp C., Gallego J., Rubalcaba L. (2011) Sectoral Innovation Performance in the Knowledge Intensive Services (ZBW Working Paper 11), Kiel: ZBW. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/54752/1/682947547.pdf, дата обращения 09.01.2022.

Heirati N., O'Cass A., Schoefer K., Siahtiri V. (2016) Do professional service firms benefit from customer and supplier collaborations in competitive, turbulent environments? Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 50-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.02.011

Johnson R.C., Noguera G. (2017) A portrait of trade in value-added over four decades. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(5), 896-911.

Kox H. (2002) Growth challenges for the Dutch business services industry: International comparison and policy issues. The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis. https://www.cpb.nl/sites/default/files/publicaties/download/growth-challenges-dutch-business-services-industry-international-comparison-and-policy.pdf, 21.08.2021.

Kox H., Rubalcaba L. (2007a) The Contribution of Business Services to European Economic Growth. In: Business Services in European Economic Growth (eds. L. Rubalcaba, H. Kox), London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 74-94.

Kox H., Rubalcaba L. (2007b) Analysing the contribution of business services to European economic growth (Bruges European Economic Research Paper No. 9), Bruges: College of Europe. https://www.coleurope.eu/sites/default/files/research-paper/beer9_0.pdf, дата обращения 21.08.2021.

Leontief W. (1936) Quantitative Input-Output Relations in the Economic System of the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 18, 105-125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1927837

Miles I., Belousova V., Chichkanov N. (2018) Knowledge intensive business services: Ambiguities and continuities. Foresight, 20(1), 1-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2017-0058

Miller R., Blair P. (2009) Input-Output Analysis Foundations and Extensions (2nd ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Miozzo M., Desyllas P., Lee H., Miles I. (2016) Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337-1351. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018

Muller E., Zenker A. (2001) Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: The role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30(9), 1501-1516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00164-0

Pasinetti L. (1988) Growing subsystems, vertically hyper-integrated sectors and the labour theory of value. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 12(1), 125-134. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23599528.

Rodriguez M., Doloreux D., Shearmur R. (2017) Variety in external knowledge sourcing and innovation novelty: Evidence from the KIBS sector in Spain. Technovation, 68, 35-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2017.06.003

Savona M., Lorentz A. (2006) Demand and Technology Determinants of Structural Change and Tertiarisation: An Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis for four OECD Countries (Document de travail No. 2006-01), Strasbourg: BETA. https://beta.u-strasbg.fr/WP/2006/2006-01.pdf, дата обращения 21.08.2021.

Schnabl E., Zenker A. (2013) Statistical Classification of Knowledge-Intensive Business Services (KIBS) with NACE Rev. 2 (evoREG Research Note 25), Strasbourg: BETA. http://www.evoreg.eu/docs/files/shno/ResearchNote_25_classificationKIBS_SCE_AZ_9_jb.pdf, дата обращения 21.08.2021.

Shearmur R., Doloreux D. (2013) Innovation and knowledge-intensive business service: The contribution of knowledge-intensive business service to innovation in manufacturing establishments. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 22(8), 751-774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2013.786581

Shearmur R., Doloreux D. (2019) KIBS as both innovators and knowledge intermediaries in the innovation process: Intermediation as a contingent role. Papers in Regional Science, 98(1), 191-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12354

Stehrer R., Hanzl D., Pindyuk O., Francois J., Biege S., Jäger A., Lay G., Borowiecki M., Dachs B., Schartinger D., Hauknes J., Knell M. (2012) Convergence of Knowledge-intensive Sectors and the EU's External Competitiveness (Report No. 377), Vienna: The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Research. https://wiiw.ac.at/convergence-of-knowledge-intensive-sectors-and-the-eu-s-external-competitiveness-dlp-2588.pdf, дата обращения 21.08.2021.

Su B., Ang B.W., Li Y. (2017) Input-output and structural decomposition analysis of Singapore's carbon emissions. Energy Policy, 105, 484-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.027

Timmer M.P., Dietzenbacher E., Los B., Stehrer R., de Vries G.J. (2015) An Illustrated User Guide to the World Input-Output Database: The Case of Global Automotive Production. Review of International Economics, 23, 575-605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12178

Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Скачивания

Данные скачивания пока не доступны.