Abstract
Enhancing innovation performance in the industrial sector of the Russian economy is a long overdue. Since 2010 the government has conducted a kind of «incumbent» policy approach, encouraging mainly the largest state-owned companies. The latter are obliged to elaborate and implement innovation development programmes (IDPs) in order to accelerate modernization of the Russian economy and increase demand for innovation.
This paper analyzes the results of the monitoring of STI activities undertaken by the state-owned companies in relation to implementation of innovative development programmes. It evaluates the interim results of government initiatives to foster innovation in the related business segment, notes the negative effects of excessive «compulsion» to innovate and provides recommendations for improving policy.
Monitoring shows that the actual priority for most companies is modernization of fixed assets through acquisition of modern machinery and equipment. Technology adoption, along with R&D investments, significantly surpasses other possible mechanisms encouraging innovative development (including support for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), education and training in innovation, co-operation with other actors in the framework of technology platforms, venture funding). The innovation outputs of the surveyed group of companies are in fact comparable to the Russian average although monitoring does not allow the assessment of corporate patent strategies or the novelty of innovative products that are produced and exported.
The author argues that the fundamental policy effect through organizational changes and investments may manifest itself in the next decade. However, the quality of the corporate management, employee loyalty to structural change and organisational culture that supports innovation, would likely be more important in enhancing overall performance. Policy recommendations include: differentiation of government incentives according to the companies’ specificities, development of their external linkages with SMEs and universities, linking innovation strategies to corporate policies, and integration of IDPs into the roadmaps of technological development of Russian regions and markets.
References
Andrew J., Sirkin H. (2006) Payback: Reaping the rewards of innovation. Boston: The Boston Consulting Group, Harvard Business School Publishing.
Capobianco A., Christiansen H. (2011) Competitive Neutrality and State-Owned Enterprises: Challenges and Policy Options. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers. № 1. Paris: OECD.
Chesbrough H. (2003) Open Innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Chesbrough H. (2006) Open Business Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
European Commission (2011) The 2011 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Grueber M., Studt T. (2011) 2012 Global R&D Funding Forecast: R&D Spending Growth Continues While Globalization Accelerates//R&D Magazine. December 16. Р. 3-35.
Jaruzelski B., Dehoff K. (2008) Beyond Borders: The Global Innovation 1000//Strategy and Business. Issue 53 (Winter). P. 1-17. Режим доступа: http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/sb53_08405.pdf (дата обращения 10 декабря 2012 г.).
Jaruzelski B., Loehr J., Holman R. (2011) Why culture is key: The Global Innovation 1000//Strategy and Business. Issue 65 (Winter). Р. 1-16. Режим доступа: http://www.strategy-business.com/media/file/sb65-11404-Global-Innovation-1000-Why-Culture-Is-Key.pdf (дата обращения 17 декабря 2012 г.).
Kanter R.M. (2009) SuperCorp: How Vanguard Companies Create Innovation, Profits, Growth, and Social Good. New York: Crown Business.
Liuhto K., Vahtra P. (2009) Who governs the Russian economy? A cross-section of Russia's largest corporations. Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute. № 12/2009. Turku School of Economics.
NESTA (2007) Hidden innovation. How innovation happens in six «low innovation» sectors. London: NESTA.
OECD (2008) OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: China. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2009) OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Korea. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2010a) The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2010b) SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Innovation Series: OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. Paris: OECD.
OECD (2011a) Business Innovation Policies: Selected Country Comparisons. Paris: OECD. Режим доступа: (дата обращения 8 октября 2012 г.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264115668-en
OECD (2011b) Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: Change and Reform in OECD Countries since 2005. Paris: OECD.
OECD, Eurostat (2005) Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data (3rd ed.). Paris: OECD.
OECD, World Bank (2009) Innovation and Growth: Chasing a Moving Frontier/Eds. C. Braga, P. Padoan, V. Chandra, D. Eröcal. Paris: OECD.
Sakakibara M. (1997) Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: Who benefits and how?//Research Policy. Vol. 26. P. 447-473.
Sakakibara M., Cho D. (2002) Cooperative R&D in Japan and Korea: A comparison of industrial policy//Research Policy. Vol. 31. P. 673-692.
USPTO (2012) Patenting by Organizations 2011. US Patent and Trademark Office. Режим доступа: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/topo_11.pdf (дата обращения 12 декабря 2012 г.).
WIPO (2011) World Intellectual Property Indicators 2011. WIPO Economics & Statistics Series. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
World Bank (2010) The Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications. P. 71-105.
Yizhou W. (2012) Shanghai spurs R&D investment//Global Times (16 August). Режим доступа: http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/727422.shtml (дата обращения 7 декабря 2012 г.).
Zeng T., Lin H. (2011) Ownership Structure and R&D Spending: Evidence from China's Listed Firms//Chinese Management Studies. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 82-93.
Гершман М.А., Голанд М.Ю., Кузнецова И.А., Рудник П.Б., Сенченя Г.И. (2012) Методические материалы по разработке и реализации программ инновационного развития акционерных обществ с государственным участием, государственных корпораций и федеральных государственных унитарных предприятий/Под ред. Л.М. Гохберга. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
Гохберг Л.М. (ред.) (2012) Экономика знаний в терминах статистики: наука, технологии, инновации, образование, информационное общество (терминологический словарь). М.: Экономика.
Гохберг Л.М., Кузнецова И.А. (2009) Инновации в российской экономике: стагнация в преддверии кризиса?//Форсайт. Т. 3. № 2. С. 28-46.
Гохберг Л.М., Кузнецова Т.Е. (2011) Стратегия 2020: новые контуры инновационной политики//Форсайт. Т. 5. № 4. С. 8-30.
Минэкономразвития (2010) Рекомендации по разработке программ инновационного развития акционерных обществ с государственным участием, государственных корпораций и федеральных государственных унитарных предприятий (утверждены решением Правительственной комиссии по высоким технологиям и инновациям от 3 августа 2010 г., протокол № 4). Режим доступа: http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/innovations/innovative/doc03082010_02 (дата обращения 18 декабря 2012 г.).
Минэкономразвития (2011) Методические материалы по разработке программ инновационного развития акционерных обществ с государственным участием, государственных корпораций и федеральных государственных унитарных предприятий (утверждены распоряжением Минэкономразвития России от 31 января 2011 г. № 3Р-ОФ). Режим доступа: http://www.economy.gov.ru/minec/activity/sections/innovations/innovative/doc20110201_02 (дата обращения 10 декабря 2012 г.).
НИУ ВШЭ (2012a) Индикаторы инновационной деятельности: 2012. Статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
НИУ ВШЭ (2012b) Индикаторы науки: 2012. Статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
НИУ ВШЭ (2013) Индикаторы инновационной деятельности: 2013. Статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
Рудник П.Б. (2011) Технологические платформы в практике российской инновационной политики//Форсайт. Т. 5. № 1. С. 16-25.
Такер Р. (2006) Инновации как формула роста. Новое будущее ведущих компаний. М.: Олимп-Бизнес.
Шпренгер К. (2010) Государственная собственность в российской экономике: масштаб и распределение по секторам//Журнал Новой экономической ассоциации. № 6. C. 120-142.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.