Keywords
open source software
proprietary software
virtual networks
co-invention
switching costs
network effects
How to Cite
Abstract
Today governments in a range of countries, including Russia, consider the promotion of open source software as an important policy tool for the development of information technologies. Since 2010 in Russia, an initiative has been undertaken to establish a National Software Platform (a set of applications based on Open Source) which, it is presumed, will be compulsorily embedded into the system of public administration. The paper assesses the efficiency of government policy in the field of Open Source and provides recommendations for its improvement.
Analyzing the specifics of the software market, that is, comparing the strengths and weaknesses of the two main types of software — proprietary («closed»), and open — as well as «extreme» types in regard to the latter (direct stimulation or complete disengagement of the government from regulating the users’ choice), the authors conclude that any extreme policy approach is hardly relevant to the considered field. One should take into account the development not only of the software, but also the whole complex of complementary assets that are factors in the economic impact of innovation. The joint work of suppliers and customers in introducing new technologies (co-invention) creates a synergy that is the key to the effective use of ICT in the economy and development of the sector as a whole. Therefore, protectionism (fostering manufacturers at the cost of limiting consumer choice) is fundamentally inconsistent with the specifics of the ICT industry, and the compulsory transition to the new type of software will lead to a significant loss in terms of «switching costs» and benefits of network effects. At the same time, the indirect measures, including information sharing and support for users of open standards, expands customer choice and reduces the costs of switching from one to another software type. It is these mechanisms that are not just compatible with the specifics of the market, but also allow maximum benefits, both for producers and consumers.
References
Akerlof G. (1970) The Market for ‘‘Lemons'': Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism//Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 84. № 3. Р. 488-500.
Bresnahan T. (2002) Prospects for the Information-Technology-Led Productivity Surge//Innovation Policy and the Economy/Eds. A.B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, S. Stern. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. P. 135-161. Режим доступа: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10787.pdf (дата обращения 23 декабря 2012 г.).
Bresnahan T., Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. (2002) Information Technology, Workplace Organisation and Demand for Skilled Labor: An Empirical Evidence//Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 117. № 1. P. 339-376.
Bresnahan T., Greenstein S., Brownstone D., Flamm K. (1996) Technical Progress and Co-Invention in Computing and in the Uses of Computers//Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics. Vol. 1996. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. P. 1-83.
Brynjofsson E., Hitt L., Yang S. (2002) Intangible Assets: Computers and Organisation Capital//Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. № 1. P. 137-198.
Brynjolfsson E., Hitt L. (2003) Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence//Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 85. № 4. P. 793-808.
Brynjolfsson E., Renshaw A.A., van Alstyne M. (1997) The Matrix of Change//Sloan Management Review. Vol. 38. № 2 (Winter). Р. 37-54.
Brynjolfsson E., Saunders A. (2010) Wired for Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Comino S., Manenti F. (2005) Government Policies Supporting Open Source Software for the Mass Market//Review of Industrial Organization. Vol. 26. P. 217-240.
David P. (1990) The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox//The American Economic Review. Vol. 80. № 2. Р. 355-361.
Economic Policy Group (2010) Sources of Singapore's Economic Growth, 1990-2009//Macroeconomic Review (April). Режим доступа: http://www.spp.nus.edu.sg/docs/publication/Sources_of_Singapore_Economic_Growth_1990-2009.pdf (дата обращения 4 сентября 2010 г.).
Ghosh R. (2003) License fees and GDP per capita: The case for open source in the developing countries//First Monday. Vol. 8. № 12. Режим доступа: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan015119.pdf (дата обращения 15 ноября 2012 г.).
Kim D. (2009) Korean Experience of Overcoming Economic Crisis through ICT Development. UNESCAP Technical Paper IDD/TP-09-01 (August). Режим доступа: http://www.unescap.org/idd/pubs/IDD_TP_09_01_of_WP_7_2_909_1.pdf (дата обращения 4 сентября 2012 г.).
Lerner J., Shankerman M. (2010) The Comingled Code. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lewis J. (2010) Government Open Source Policies. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Milgrom P., Roberts J. (1990) The Economics of Modern Manufacturing: Technology, Strategy and Organization//American Economic Review. Vol. 80. № 3. P. 511-528.
Nichols D., Twidale M. (2003) The Usability of Open Source Software//First Monday. Vol. 8. № 1 (6 January). Режим доступа: http://firstmonday.org/article/view/1018/939 (дата обращения 19 сентября 2012 г.).
OSOR.EU (2009) CIO of Extremadura: Open Source a key to development. Режим доступа: http://www.epractice.eu/en/news/299187 (дата обращения 5 сентября 2012 г.).
OpenOffice.org (2004a) Differences in Use between Calc and Excel. Режим доступа: http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/manuals/oooauthors/SpreadsheetDifferences.pdf (дата обращения 4 сентября 2012 г.).
OpenOffice.org (2004b) Porting Excel/VBA to Calc/Star Basic. Режим доступа: http://www.openoffice.org/documentation/HOW_TO/various_topics/VbaStarBasicXref.pdf (дата обращения 4 сентября 2012 г.).
Schmidt K., Schnitzer M. (2003) Public Subsidies for Open Source? Some Economic Policy Issues of the Software Market//Harvard Journal of Law and Technology. Vol. 16. № 2 (Spring). Р. 473-505.
Shapiro C., Varian H. (1999) Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
UNCTAD (2011) Information Economy Report: ICT as Enabler for Private Sector Development. Режим доступа: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/ier2011_en.pdf (дата обращения 6 сентября 2012 г.).
Varian H., Farrell J., Shapiro C. (2005) The Economics of Information Technology: An Introduction (Raffаele Mattioli Lectures). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Varian Н., Shapiro C. (2003) Linux Adoption in the Public Sector: An Economic Analysis. University of California at Berkeley Working Paper. Режим доступа: http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~hal/Papers/2004/linux-adoption-in-the-public-sector.pdf (дата обращения 26 декабря 2012 г.).
Wong K. (2004) Free/Open Source Software. Government Policy. International Open Source Network. Elsevier, UNDP-APDIP. Режим доступа: http://www.iosn.net/government/foss-government-primer/foss-govt-policy.pdf (дата обращения 28 декабря 2012 г.).
Балашова С.А., Лазанюк И.В. (2004) Государственное регулирование сектора информационных технологий: Индия и Россия//Электронный журнал «Исследовано в России». T. 7. № 199. С. 2119-2128. Режим доступа: http://zhurnal.ape.relarn.ru/articles/2004/199.pdf (дата обращения 10 января 2013 г.).
Дорошенко М.Е. (2011) Инновационный потенциал сектора интеллектуальных услуг в России//Форсайт. Т. 5. № 4. С. 50-65.
Макаров В.Л., Клейнер Г.Б. (2007) Микроэкономика знаний. М.: ЗАО «Издательство “Экономика”».
НИУ ВШЭ (2012) Информационное общество: тенденции развития. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
НИУ ВШЭ (2013) Индикаторы информационного общества: 2013. Статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ.
Перминов С.Б. (2007) Информационные технологии как фактор экономического роста. М.: Наука.
Перминов С.Б., Егорова Е.Н. (2009) Сектор информационных технологий в российской экономике: факторы и ограничения роста//Экономическая наука в современной России. № 1. C. 105-115.
РАСПО (2012) Письмо Президенту РФ В.В. Путину о выполнении Распоряжения Правительства РФ от 17 декабря 2010 г. № 2299-р, 14.09.2012. Режим доступа: http://www.raspo.ru/files/files/pismo_14_09_2012.pdf (дата обращения 21 сентября 2012 г.).
ЦГТ (2012) Исследование ООН: рейтинг стран мира по уровню электронного правительства 2012 г. Информационно-аналитическое агентство «Центр гуманитарных технологий». Режим доступа: http://gtmarket.ru/news/2012/03/09/4102 (дата обращения 8 сентября 2012 г.).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.